Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Printers Cafe, shown here on March 12, 2024, is set to close in early April, when its lease expires. Photo by Gennady Sheyner

Printers Cafe, a California Avenue mainstay that opened as a bookstore more than 40 years ago before transitioning into a restaurant, is preparing to shutter in early April to accommodate a new gym.

The city is currently reviewing plans from the owners of Palo Alto Fit, whose gym is currently located at Portage Avenue but who want to move the business to California Avenue. Nina Nguyen, owner of Palo Alto Fit, wants the gym to occupy the two buildings on California Avenue, near Birch Street: 310 California Ave., which currently houses another gym, Performance Gaines; and 320 California Ave., which includes Printers Cafe and its two subtenants, Gallery House Fine Art and Moods Wine Bar.

In her October 2023 application, Nguyen described Palo Alto Fit as a “boutique specializing in personal training and nutrition consultation.” The mission, she wrote, is to “assist clients with health-related concerns, serving a diverse clientele from all age, primarily in Palo Alto.”

The gym project is not, however, a done deal. To open a gym at the Printers Cafe building, Nguyen has to obtain a conditional use permit from the city, which will entail reviews by the Planning and Transportation Commission and the City Council, according to the Department of Planning and Development Services.

Nguyen told this publication in an email that after 10 years of using different sites, including the current one at 425 Portage Ave., her team has been looking for a permanent location. The search has spanned several years, she said, as they looked for a space that “remains convenient for our clients and accommodates our needs.”

“After an extensive search, the California Avenue building was the best option,” she wrote. “California Avenue is also the great location for our clients, as it is within walking and biking distance from their homes. We also have more public transportation and parking options available than we do today.”

Nguyen and Mirco Horst purchased the properties at 310 and 320 California Ave. in June 2023 for $2.9 million, according to records from Santa Clara County Assessor’s Office.

Nguyen said her team also plans to open a new cafe at 320 California Ave. as part of its proposal for the building. The specialty cafe, she said, will “offer a refined selection of great coffees (and) healthy food items.”

“Designed as a healthy retreat, it will provide the community with a space to convene for relaxation and enjoyment in an inviting ambiance,” she wrote in an email. “A place where you can sit down and enjoy high-quality coffee and some healthy snacks.”

But the proposed cafe also means a very likely — and very imminent — departure of Printers Cafe, a neighborhood institution that began as a book store, Printers Inc. The book store opened in 1978 and shuttered in 2001.

Al Ghaufari, owner of Printer’s Cafe, said his current lease is expiring on April 6. Ghaufari, who bought the cafe more than 15 years ago, said he was disappointed to learn earlier this year that he will likely be forced to leave California Avenue. While he had initially hoped to negotiate an extension to stay for three to five more years, the building’s owners have recently indicated that the lease would not be extended.

The cafe, he said, has a long history in Palo Alto and many of his customers have been patronizing the business for more than 30 years. Some of his employees have worked at the cafe for more than 18 years and he was hoping to keep the business open for a few more years to help support them.

“While I’m disappointed, I’m still hopeful we can meet and find an amicable solution,” Ghaufari said.

If forced to leave, as seems likely, he said does not plan to reopen elsewhere.

His two subtenants, meanwhile, are already preparing for new locations. Moods Wine Bar is moving to Sunnyvale, where it will add Afghani cuisine to its menu, said Mahmoud Saljooqi, owner of Moods.

A former hairstylist, Saljooqi worked at salons on University Avenue and on Birch Street before taking the leap into the wine business. His relationship with Printers Cafe began like it does for most customers: He stopped by in the afternoon for a cup of coffee. He opened Moods in 2017, seeing the new business as a way to both fulfill his dream and help the cafe with rent.

Saljooqi said in an interview he was grateful for his time at Printers Cafe and his partnership with Ghafouri.

“It was an amazing experience and journey for me, honestly,” Saljooqi said.

He began looking for a new location earlier this year, when he learned that the Printers Cafe lease is unlikely to be renewed. His new location, he said, will be at 111 Evelyn Ave. in Sunnyvale. While he’s looking forward to the new venture, Saljooqi said he is sad to depart Palo Alto.

“I’d rather have stuck around here on Cal Ave.,” Saljooqi said.

The Gallery House is also leaving, though it’s probably not going far. The contemporary art gallery has found a potential location along Santa Cruz Avenue in Menlo Park, according to Peter Koltai, board chair at the Gallery House. While the location is now being renovated, the deal has not yet been finalized, he said.

Koltai said in an interview that it became clear in recent months that the gallery, which has been in Palo Alto for 65 years, would not be able to afford the rent that would have been required under the new building owners. While Gallery House looked for suitable spaces around both University and California avenues, everything was out of its price range, he said.

“Palo Alto is a fine community and we loved being here,” Koltai said. “It’s gotten to the point now where we cannot afford to be in Palo Alto any longer.”

While Moods and Gallery House are preparing to leave by the end of the month, it’s far from clear when the new gym would open at 310 and 320 California Ave. While the Planning Director Jonathan Lait has the authority to approve conditional use permits, he also has the power to defer this approval to the Planning and Transportation Commission and the City Council.

In this case, he chose to float the project to the planning commission and the council, according to Project Manager Nishita Kandikuppa. The Planning and Transportation Commission is tentatively scheduled to review the conditional use permit request at 6 p.m. on April 10, she said.

While such a process helps ensure that the project is properly vetted and that all major community concerns are addressed, it also creates the potential for a protracted review period. The council’s 2022 vote to approve a conditional use permit for Castilleja School’s campus reconstruction followed six years of public hearings and project modifications.

Nguyen said in an email she plans to eventually close the Portage Avenue location of Palo Alto Fit, though not until the California Avenue location is ready for the move. This, she said, is to ensure a seamless transition for the gym’s clients. The exact timing of the move, however, depends on the length of time it will take to get the conditional use permit and the necessary building permits, as well as the interior remodeling that will need to take place.

In her letter to the city, she made the case that the project will benefit both her business and the Palo Alto community.

“We believe this expansion, combined with our building ownership, will positively impact Palo Alto’s health and well-being,” Nguyen wrote.

Gennady Sheyner covers local and regional politics, housing, transportation and other topics for the Palo Alto Weekly, Palo Alto Online and their sister publications. He has won awards for his coverage...

Join the Conversation

23 Comments

    1. Another gym? This “new” gym is replacing the gym that’s already there. And quite frankly this new gym owner is kicking out an existing gym that’s doing well and has members in the community going. It’s one of the few (if only) black businesses on that street and this lady wants to kick them out along with a longstanding cafe so she can have her little gym. Why not go find an empty space. Kicking out an existing gym does not speak highly of her integrity and character.

  1. I am so sad to hear this. I love and have loved Printer’s Inc. over the years, and cannot believe that Palo Alto is losing another “old school” gathering spot that brings locals together in such a unique setting. Replacing it with ANOTHER gym and elite gourmet coffee shop – likely indoors – is a tragic outcome if CPA Planning allows for this conditional use permit to go forward. How is either of those a community benefit? How can our local government help save some of these more casual establishments? More gyms are not what Cal Ave needs…

  2. This is a real loss to California Avenue and the surrounding neighborhoods. Printer’s Ink has been a gathering place for young and old for many generations. The City of Palo Alto needs to wake up and smell the coffee. There are lots of other shuttered storefronts on California Ave. Why don’t these people take over where the Palo Alto Bakery used to be? We don’t need to have more empty storefronts. Save Printer’s Ink. Bmartin

  3. Another gym for Cal Ave?? Well, maybe now the city can save the taxpayers money by not making us pay for a city-owned and city-operated gym to compete with private taxpaying businesses.

  4. Seems like an obvious progression from permanently blocking the street to the establishment of businesses less dependent on foot traffic.

  5. We need retail to remain on California Avenue. Losing the cafe, gallery and wine bar is a BLOW to the community. Gyms are dead spaces. They serve a specific demographic and can be elsewhere such as Equinox near the ECR. The city needs to understand that this use is incompatible with the business distict on California Avenue.

  6. 1st: Is there some easy way to be alerted when these “historical” properties are being put on the market? It would be a great service if some part of our city planning web page could show a map of older retails and possible changes so we could support these. Other buyers who want a diverse business presence might emerge.
    2nd: *Ditto* on the gym comments. Portage is a more appropriate location, especially at the expense of losing 2 different/valued businesses plus an existing gym.
    3rd: Sometimes it is worth turning back the clock. We could use the return of an office/computer/art supply store at Printers (or next door), and certainly–if Moods is already enjoying the idea of an expanded venture in Sunnyvale–a good brew pub.

    This is another saturated niche (doomed?) that will result in losing more history on Cal ave. Ugh.

  7. Just a little reminder that over the decades we’ve spent many millions of dollars on “retail” consultants with little or no local knowledge and that even some of them have warned REPEATEDLY that gyms and nail salons DO NOT encourage retail sales because their patrons are inside their establishments for the duration of their workouts and/personal services.

    They even counted the number of beauty / nail salons on Cal Ave a few years back even though they counted wrong,

    Maybe the city could stop their consultant gravy train and start asking US, the taxpaying residents what WE want and need, which we’d be glad to do and won’t even cap the contractual numbers of those surveyed at 7 — (3 retailers, 3 landlords and the Chamber of Commerce president) — like the City Manager’s office did when awardng for the $1,800,000 contract to the 2 latest consulting firms that had to be told — AGAIN — that clean streets and emptied garbage cans might encourage more foot traffic.

    You know, I’ll bet we the residents would tell the city want we want for a mere $750,00K — a bargain given the amount of money we’ve wasted — to give the city they predetermined answers they want to destroy resident-serving businesses.

  8. I am sorry for the loss of Printers Cafe, and given the comments I am not alone.

    As for a gym, what is proposed looks to be another training space where you pay a fee for a trainer each time you visit. From the article: “In her October 2023 application, Nguyen described Palo Alto Fit as a boutique specializing in personal training and nutrition consultation.”

    The last general purpose gym in Palo Alto, where you walk in and use the equipment on your schedule (with just a monthly charge) was Form Fitness on Bryant that closed in 2022. Reach gym on High Street closed six years ago and and The Training Space on Alma folded during the pandemic.

    Oh well, it is back to the “Y” which requires a drive from our home.

    1. The gym that is already there has trainers but you can go and work out without a trainer. There are different fee structures depending on your needs. I go there and love it. There is a nice community of trainers who actually know what they are doing. She’s kicking out a perfectly nice and friendly black owned business. I heard this was a private sale. Never on the market and was approached by the new gym owner. I don’t think this building was actually for sale. But I could be wrong.

  9. Yuck – more gym space on Cal Ave. And if the City buckles under, we lose more good ground floor retail space.
    The worst of the worst combination.

  10. To take away one of the last ‘legacy’ businesses from California Avenue, and one that has such a wonderful community-boosting sidewalk presence, in an area in which the Palo Alto City Council has decided to encourage the sidewalk/street vitality, is unfathomable to me. What are they thinking?

  11. Here is info I received from the city if you want to provide input:

    I am reaching out with updates regarding the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application for 310 California Avenue (Palo Alto Fit, formerly known as Performance Gaines).

    The CUP application has been scheduled for a Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) hearing. The hearing date is tentatively scheduled for April 10, 2024, at 6 PM. The goal of this meeting is for the PTC to hear from residents and provide initial comments and recommendations to City Council.

    During this time, you will have the opportunity to present your

    comments (up to 3 minutes per speaker). This could be reduced to a lesser time if there are a significant number of commentors, subject to a decision by the Chair of the PTC. Please know that all comment letters/emails received prior to the hearing date will be attached to the staff report for the PTC’s review.

    The agenda and staff report will be published approximately one week prior to the meeting, here: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/Departments/Planning-Development-Services/Planning-and-Transportation-Commission-PTC/Current-PTC-Agendas-Minutes [cityofpaloalto.org].

  12. I personally was never a huge fan of Printer’s Cafe, but I am still sad to see a loss of history on the street, and even though I am probably Palo Alto Fit’s target demographic, I agree that Cal Ave does not need yet another gym. We need more spaces that encourage community, and for all kinds of people. I agree with someone above who said to bring back an art supply store–like the one there was decades ago! And, I am still reeling from the loss of the Nut House.

  13. Absolutely! We need more people like Nina Nguyen in this town. Palo Alto Fit’s impending move to California Avenue is not just about relocating a gym; it’s about nurturing a community of wellness and empowerment. As someone who has been a client for nearly 7 years, I can attest to Nina Nguyen’s incredible dedication to her clients and team. Here are a few more points to consider:

    1. Empowerment: Personal training empowers individuals by providing them with the knowledge, skills, and confidence to take control of their fitness journey, leading to a more active and empowered community.

    2. Long-term Sustainability: By promoting personalized fitness plans and lifestyle changes, Palo Alto Fit’s personal training services encourage long-term sustainability in health and fitness practices, benefitting the community’s overall wellness.

    3. Social Connection: Participating in personal training sessions fosters social connections and support networks among community members, creating a sense of camaraderie and belonging.

    4. Positive Influence: The presence of Palo Alto Fit’s personal training services can serve as a positive influence on community members, inspiring them to prioritize health and wellness in their lives and setting a precedent for a healthier community culture.

    5. Collaboration Opportunities: Personal training services at Palo Alto Fit offer opportunities for collaboration with local healthcare providers, schools, and community organizations to promote health education and wellness initiatives, further enhancing the city’s overall health landscape.

    With Palo Alto Fit’s holistic approach to fitness and well-being, the future looks brighter and healthier for Palo Alto residents. 100% support Palo Alto Fit to be on Cal Ave. Not a fan of Printer Cafe, but excited for this positive change in our community. Here’s to embracing this transformation and building a stronger, healthier community together!

    1. There’s a gym that’s already in that location that does just that. It’s called Performance Gaines and is one of the best gyms around. Nina can go look for another empty space somewhere else and put her gym there. Personally she’s doing a disservice to the community by displacing 6 businesses occupying that building. Now PG has to spend money and resources to relocate so she can have her little space. Already not a fan of Palo Alto Fit.

  14. Any additional indoor gyms and outdoor dining options should be banned in California Ave (Palo Alto’s 2nd Downtown is fast becoming it’s last resort to first eat and then sweat the extra calaries off !? Bazar and strange downtown business model — where is the chamber of commerce or a biz association . No cohesion, just more loss of community bonds. A commerced, distillery of money and greed — When a single iPhone screen protector is $20 in a store and $1.99 online. This is a problem !

  15. Understand your perspective. Nina, as a business owner, is making decisions to secure a location for her business, which is a common practice in entrepreneurship. It’s important to consider the broader context of property development in the area. If Nina hadn’t acquired the building, it’s possible that other developers would have, potentially leading to similar displacements.

Leave a comment