Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Stanford University issued a directive on Feb. 8 for students to remove their belongings from White Plaza and end the longest running consecutive sit-in protest in the university’s history. Photo by Emily Margaretten.

Update, Feb. 14: Students representing the “Sit In to Stop Genocide” have agreed to end overnight camping at White Plaza on Friday, Feb. 16, according to a statement posted by Stanford University. The university said it would not initiate law enforcement action or disciplinary procedures until after that time. The university also has agreed to two meetings with students representing the group to hear their demands. Both meetings were scheduled to occur before the Friday deadline. Students are expected to comply with the ban on overnight camping, irrespective of the meetings’ outcomes, according to a letter that the sit-in representatives accepted on Feb. 12 and was posted on their Instagram account.

Update, Feb. 10: In a letter to the Stanford University community posted on the Stanford Report website and dated Feb. 8, administrators stated that a recent incident in which space reserved by a group known as the Blue and White Tent was taken over by another group “escalated risk of conflict in White Plaza and increased the threat to the safety of members of our community.” University staff have told the students of the second group that they need to vacate the space, the letter states. 

In addition, the university wrote, to enforce its overnight ban, “any tents, tables, chairs, or other similar items will need to be removed from White Plaza between the hours of 8 p.m. and 8 a.m. Any overnight displays and/or camping items left unoccupied are subject to removal for health and safety reasons.”

In a hand-delivered letter, Stanford University gave 12-hours notice to student protestors on Thursday morning, Feb. 8, that they needed to pack up their belongings and end the longest continuous sit-in protest in the university’s history.

Since Oct. 20, students have been camping out in Stanford’s White Plaza, protesting the war in Gaza and Israel’s actions against Palestinians. The students have said that they will not end their “Sit In to Stop Genocide” until the university supports a cease-fire in Gaza and commits to a broader movement that calls for the boycott, disinvestment and sanction of Israel, among other things.

The university has responded to a few of the demands, stating that it would do more to combat Islamophobia and ensure the safety of its Palestinian, Arab and Muslim students. But it did not accede to the students’ other demands and, in response, they have not left their sit-in on the plaza.

During this same period, additional protest groups have taken up residence at White Plaza as well, including a pro-Israel one known as the Blue and White Tent. 

Hundreds of students congregated at White Plaza on Thursday, Feb. 8 to demonstrate their solidarity with the pro-Palestinian sit-in that has been in place at White Plaza since Oct. 20. Photo by Emily Margaretten.

“Rain or shine, day and night, over the breaks and holidays, we’ve been here,” said Hana Spahia, a Stanford student.

Now it looks like the 112-day stalemate could come to an end. On Feb. 8, a Stanford administrator walked up to the protestors and delivered a letter from Student Affairs stating that the university would no longer allow “overnight displays and camping” in White Plaza.

The letter, which has been posted to the demonstration’s Instagram account, cites the university’s existing policy prohibiting overnight camping unless specifically permitted by the university and said it would be enforced as of 8 p.m. Thursday evening.

“The university has allowed overnight camping in White Plaza since the events of October 7, out of a desire to support the peaceful expression of free speech in the ways that students choose to exercise that expression,” the letter states. But then it asserts that the continuing camp out is causing safety issues.

“Extended camping in an open area accessible to the public, accessible to rodents and other animals, and vulnerable to extreme weather inherently poses safety concerns,” it said.

The letter goes on to cite an incident of a display that was left unoccupied overnight by the Blue and White Tent group that collapsed during last weekend’s storm, posing a safety hazard on campus.

But for students who have been participating in the Palestinian sit-in, the safety concerns are overblown and a pretext for getting rid of them, they said. With less than 12 hours to mobilize, the demonstrators asked supporters to join them at White Plaza and resist the university’s plan to break down their site.

Hundreds of supporters, mostly Stanford students, showed up to demonstrate their solidarity with the sit-in movement. At 6:30 p.m. they congregated in front of the tents, their numbers steadily growing over the next hour.

Students linked arms and encircled the protest camp-site at White Plaza on Thursday evening, after receiving a letter from Stanford University that said the sit-in could no longer continue overnight. Photo by Emily Margaretten.

Safety volunteer marshals, affiliated with the demonstration, kept the crowd in order and out of public throughways while organizers called out protest chants and made speeches in support of Palestine.

“Stanford has yet to take action, has yet to condemn the genocide,” said an organizer with a megaphone. “We intend to be here until our demands are met,” she added, to a roar of cheers.

The university in its letter stated that students who didn’t leave would receive a disciplinary referral to the Office of Community Standards and “may also be cited for trespass.” But the threat of disciplinary action did not seem to dampen the crowd’s mood; many students expressed an intent to defy the university’s directive and camp out overnight.

“This is part of something larger,” said Annabelle Davis, a Stanford student who has been closely involved in the sit-in. “We want the university to behave ethically,” she said, adding that this was one of the few spaces on campus where she has found an accepting and welcoming community for all people, including herself, as she is Jewish.

As 8 p.m. approached, the crowd linked arms, forming a circle around the tents in anticipation that they might be forced to leave. But as the hour passed, nobody from the university came to dismantle the sit-in. Students then sat down for the night, still closely pressed to each other.

Students hunkered down for the night with laptops, books and blankets in defiance of Stanford University’s mandate to end the overnight sit-in by 8 p.m. on Thursday, Feb. 8. Photo by Emily Margaretten.

“It’s wrong to make them leave in such an underhanded way,” said one Stanford student, who asked not to be identified by name. The student was watching from outside the circle. When asked why he was attending the demonstration, he explained that he was working on a class project with a Palestinian student who can’t return home.

“I don’t have a connection to the conflict. But I do have a connection to the people here,” he said, noting that he was from South Korea and his parents had been refugees from North Korea.

“I want to support students like him. This is a big turnout from the community and it’s important that it exists,” he added.

By 12:45 a.m., students had settled down for the night with blankets and books, Davis said. She estimated that more than 100 students stayed overnight. Officers from the Santa Clara County Sherifff’s Office, which staffs Stanford’s Department of Public Safety, showed up at 7:30 a.m. but left around 8 a.m., Davis said.

Dee Mostofi, Stanford University’s assistant vice president of external communication, provided the following emailed statement on Feb. 9 when asked how the university would enforce the overnight sit-in ban at White Plaza.

“As we said in our statement yesterday, Stanford’s commitment to supporting the free expression of views on White Plaza remains firmly in place. However, we also believe that overnight camping compromises the safety and wellbeing of members of our community and remains prohibited. We are in continued discussion with our students on White Plaza on this matter and are committed to exploring peaceful ways to allow them to express their free speech rights while ensuring the safety of our entire community.”

Editor’s note: This story has been updated to include information about the Blue and White Tent group and the university’s specific directive regarding the removal of tables and other displays from White Plaza overnight.

Emily Margaretten joined the Mountain View Voice in 2023 as a reporter covering City Hall. She was previously a staff writer at The Guardsman and a freelance writer for several local publications, including...

Join the Conversation

12 Comments

  1. With the absurd claims of “genocide”, this is actually a pro-HAMAS demonstration. As repulsive as it is, I favor Stanford letting it continue, because it may encourage some parents to inquire what kind of education their $300/day is actually buying at Stanford, and to what extent their kid supports terrorists — something they almost certainly would not encourage.

    1. “Absurd claims of genocide”? As a resident of Palo Alto who was there on Thursday evening, I find your reaction to be rediculous and also absurd. I have visisted the site on 2 occasions and I did not hear or see anyone who expressed support for HAMAS. Is the claim of genocide really absurd? The Israeli military has murdered around 30,000 Palestinians, including thousands of women and children. Most of these people did not threaten Israelis. Indiscriminate murder of thousands of people is genocide.

    2. I have been a lawyer for approx. 15 years and watched and read the ICJ (the world’s highest court) and federal district court hearings on this. They both found Israel is plausibly committing genocide, is likely to cause irreparable harm to the Palestinian people and must be stopped immediately. Here is from Judge White in federal district court on 1/31/24 (Case 4:23-cv-05829-JSW):

      “the undisputed evidence before this Court comports with the finding of the ICJ and indicates that the current treatment of the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip by the Israeli military may plausibly constitute a genocide in violation of international law. Both the uncontroverted testimony of the [Palestinian witnesses] and the expert opinion proffered at the hearing on these motions as well as statements made by various officers of the Israeli government indicate that the ongoing military siege in Gaza is intended to eradicate a whole people and therefore plausibly falls within the international prohibition against genocide…It is every individual’s obligation to confront the current siege in Gaza”

  2. This is a poorly reported story. It ignores that the Student Affairs was sent to everyone on campus and reported in the Stanford Daily. It also fails to mention that the other two groups protesting (one pro-Israel and one anti-Islamaphobia) both complied with the new rules. The Pro-Hamas group is teh only one that failed to comply. This reads like her information came from the Pro-Hamas group.

    1. From what I read, the Israeli camp was unmanned and knocked down in the storm. I visited the Stanford tent the other day (kudos to people following the US district court judge’s recent order (case 4:23-cv-05829-JSW which found plausible genocide in Gaza and noted that “it is every individual’s obligation to confront the current siege in Gaza”) and watched “Israelism” which I would recommend to everyone. The Israeli camp was UNATTENDED. Having an unattended camp is dangerous because everything can blow away and hurt people. So to say they followed the new rules doesn’t make any sense because their tent was BLOWN AWAY.

  3. There is a major error in the article. The so-called Pro-Palestinian tent is not pro-Palestinian at all – it is just Anti-Israeli. In fact, they couldn’t care less about Palestinians’ lives. They do not support peaceful co-existence. Instead, they focus on the destruction of the state of Israel. They promote Hamas and the same radical ideas that brought the current tragedy.

  4. So inspiing to see close to 500 people show up last night to support the sit-in. Incredibly shameful that Stanford is trying to close down a protest against the first ever genocide being broadcast globally in almost real time despite Israel’s targeting and murdering more than 100 journalists in Gaza (to say nothing of slaughtering 10,000+ children). The courageous Stanford students give me hope that this generation has both the awareness and the courage to stand up to the McCarthyesque forces of Zionism in America and end American funding for Israeli Apartheid, land theft, home demolitions, illegal settlements, subjecting Palestinians to military courts with a 99% conviction rate and other crimes against humanity. America screams bloody murder when Russia goes into Ukraine or China cracksdown in Hong Kong but when Israel unleashes a murderous assault on Gaza, our President and Secretary of State repeat Israeli lies about beheaded babies and tortured families, expedites the shipment of instruments of death and then Congress writes Israel yet anther check for $17 BILLION? Has our nation lost its very soul?

  5. It used to be illegal to protest with a mask but the pandemic has thrown a wrinkle into that law and college campuses have no idea how to address this issue. There is no way to tell how many of these protestors and campers are students vs professional protesters. Perhaps it is time to order masks removed for protests that are outside- there is plenty of space for them to spread out when they aren’t huddling under tents during the rain.

    1. Have you come to the tent? Have you participated in the protests against what both the ICJ (the world’s highest court) and the federal district court found was plausible genocide? I have visited the tent to watch a screening of “Israelism” which I found very informative and didn’t see anyone trying to obscure their identity. Given they are on the right side of history why would they try to obscure their identities? The US district court (case 4:23-cv-05829-JSW) recently noted that “it is every individual’s obligation to confront the current siege in Gaza”. What are you doing to stop the killing of children in Gaza?

  6. The truly horrifying thing to see is how pro-palestenian groups are justifying atrocities committed against Israelis on October 7 – either by saying it was a form of “resistance” or refusing to acknowledge that they really happen or spreading lies about them never happening at all. We are seriously entering a Holocaust denial territory. Actually, we are well into the Holocaust denial territory. Noel might be right. Our nation is loosing its soul if we find antisemitism acceptable and even justified.

    1. Have you visited their tent? If not, what experience are you speaking from? I did visit and saw nothing of the sort you are speaking about. The facts are there were horrible atrocities committed by Hamas in Israel on Oct. 7 where approx. 1200 people were killed and there are horrible atrocities committed by Israel since then that have caused approx. 30K deaths so far and rising. This was all heard before the world’s highest court, the ICJ, which rejected Israel’s argument that Oct. 7 justifies genocide. You cannot commit genocide no matter how horrible the crime committed against you was.

  7. There is a major error in the article. The so-called Pro-Palestinian tent is not pro-Palestinian at all – it is just Anti-Israeli. In fact, they couldn’t care less about Palestinians’ lives. They do not support peaceful co-existence. Instead, they focus on the destruction of the state of Israel. They promote Hamas and the same radical ideas that brought the current tragedy.

Leave a comment