Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

The Palo Alto Fire and Police departments respond to a fire on Ruthven Avenue on March 27, 2019. Photo by Veronica Weber.

With the local economy picking up steam, the Palo Alto City Council kicked off on Monday its review of a budget that would add dozens of positions, expand library hours, beef up staffing in the city’s Police and Fire departments and fund major upgrades to the city’s wastewater plant.

In presenting the budget to the council, City Manager Ed Shikada said the spending plan represents a recovery period as Palo Alto moves “from a pandemic state to an endemic state” while trying to make progress on the council’s key priorities. It reflects recent upticks in all major revenue sources, a trend that is expected to result in a surplus of $12 million in the current budget year, which ends on June 30, and growth next year.

But while the budget would restore many of the cuts that the council had made over the past two years, Shikada warned that the city will need to come up with additional funding sources to address the council’s priorities, most notably affordable housing and grade separation at the rail tracks.

Shikada’s proposal includes a $934.2 million operating budget, a 32.8% increase from the current year. The budget of the general fund, which pays for most city services other than utilities, would be about $237.8 million, an increase of 15.2% from the current fiscal year.

The other sizable increases would come in the $351 million capital improvement plan, which would be $173.6 million more than the capital budget of the current year. This includes an ambitious $186.6-million upgrade of the water quality control plant, which serves Palo Alto, Stanford University, East Palo Alto, Mountain View, Los Altos and Los Altos Hills. The cost of this major project, which includes $144.7 million for secondary treatment upgrades and $16.9 million for an advanced water purification facility, would be shared by all the agencies involved in the plant.

For the council, the Monday discussion marked a significant shift after two years of austerity and fiscal uncertainty. After cutting about $40 million from the budget in 2020 and restoring some services last year thanks in large part to federal grants, council members are now preparing to pass a budget that includes an increase of 58.85 positions over the current year.

Rather than debating service cuts and position reductions, council members found themselves wrestling with a different question on Monday: How fast can positions be restored?

Mayor Pat Burt said the question should play a central role in the council’s deliberations as it reviews the budget. He pointed to the recent challenges that the city has faced when it comes to hiring staff in a tight labor market. Given these conditions, Burt suggested delaying some of its staffing decisions until such time that council members have a better idea of both the city’s long-term funding sources and its ability to actually fill the budgeted positions.

A key factor is the result of the November election, when voters will likely have a chance to weigh in on two separate revenue measures, a business tax and a measure that would affirm Palo Alto’s historic practice of transferring funds from its gas utility to the general fund. The council agreed last week that if the business tax passes, the revenues would be used to pay for affordable housing, redesign of rail crossings, public safety and improvements to University and California avenues. The utility measure, meanwhile, would bolster the city’s general fund by another $7 million annually. The council would have broad discretion on how to spend these funds.

Even without the ballot measures, the city’s public safety departments are in for staffing increases. The police budget, which went from $40.8 million in 2021 to $43.1 million in 2022, is set to increase to $47.1 million in 2023 under Shikada’s proposal. This includes four additional patrol officers and two dispatchers. Chief Financial Officer Kiely Nose said Monday that the budget increase would allow the Police Department to bolster a special unit that responds to calls involving psychiatric emergencies and to add positions to its investigative unit, which dwindled to just two positions earlier this year.

In the Fire Department, the city would restore a deputy chief position that manages recruitment, hiring, promotions and succession planning, according to the budget. The city also plans to hire three firefighter trainees who could be used to swiftly fill department vacancies as they arise.

“The labor market is fierce and so (we’re) developing programs to help us reach individuals at different stages or levels of experience,” Nose said. “This is one that would allow us to establish some trainees that could ideally be candidates to move into full-fledged firefighter positions.”

The boost in staffing is enabled in part by a healthy growth in revenues. General fund revenues are projected to increase by $31.4 million next year, with every major category showing a healthy rebound. Hotel tax revenues, which dropped precipitously during the pandemic, are projected to increase by 115.9% in the next fiscal year, going from $8.5 million to $18.2 million. Sales tax revenues are expected to go up from $28.6 million to $32.6 million, a 15.6% increase.

While the details of Shikada’s budget will be reviewed in the coming month by the council’s Finance Committee, most council members indicated on Monday that they generally support his approach. Council member Eric Filseth observed that the headcount in the Police and Fire departments has declined by about 30% over the last 18 years. While some of that could be attributed to process and technology improvements, the trend also reflects the city’s recent efforts to balance its budget by cutting back on public safety, a practice that preceded the pandemic.

“And we’ve seen some of the results,” Filseth said. “People have noticed that traffic enforcement is reduced versus what it was several years ago. The first fire station brownout predated the pandemic.”

But even though the revenue figures signal a remarkable turnaround after two years of economic pain, council members cautioned that Palo Alto will continue to face budget challenges. Council member Tom DuBois observed that the budget still relies in part on one-time funding sources such as the remaining $5.5 million from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

“It really points to the importance of ballot measures,” DuBois said.

Council member Greg Tanaka pointed to broader economic challenges, including rising inflation. He urged staff to hire fewer full-time employees and to rely on contractors where possible.

“I do wonder if we could have such a large fixed cost that’s harder to change later on,” Tanaka said.

The one area of the budget that will almost certainly see a revision is funding for youth mental health. Last year, the council approved $50,000 for Youth Connect, a program by the nonprofit Youth Community Services that aims to forge collaboration between high school students and adults in the broader community. The funding was not, however, included in this year’s budget, much to the consternation of the organization.

Mora Oommen, executive director Youth Community Service, urged the council to fund the program, which recently received a grant from Santa Clara County.

“It is disheartening to see the city’s budget expanding in many areas while eliminating funding for youth mental health,” Oommen said. “Cutting this funding is out of alignment with both local and national cries for more support for mental health of youth.”

Most council members agreed that this funding should be restored, particularly in light of the toll that the COVID-19 pandemic has taken on youth mental health. Council member Greer Stone, a government teacher at Carlmont High School in Belmont, cited a recent study from the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention that found that 44% of high school students reported in 2021 that they “persistently felt sad or hopeless during the past year.”

“Both as a council member and as a teacher who’d had to witness the deteriorating mental health of my own students in the last two years, I really can’t imagine a more important issue to fund than youth mental health,” Stone said.

Other council members also signaled support for funding Youth Connect. And no one on the council had any objections to boosting the police budget, though resident Bob Moss suggested that the additional funding should focus on emergency response for people who have physical or mental issues.

“We should be expanding the city’s staff which has expertise in those areas for physical health, mental health, assisting people who have physical problems when there’s a police call for them,” Moss said. “Those are areas where we should be focusing any excess money or any excess resources.”

Gennady Sheyner covers local and regional politics, housing, transportation and other topics for the Palo Alto Weekly, Palo Alto Online and their sister publications. He has won awards for his coverage...

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1. Whereas restoring jobs in the field is a productive use of funds, I am wary about the creating of new desk jobs with fancy titles and vague job descriptions.

    Over the past two years we have suffered the loss of the shuttle and although the new foot bridge is open, some of the other projects appear to be painfully slow. I think also that there should be money spent on infrastructure improvements such as some of the intersections that cause so many problems around town. As far as parking, we have been promised electronic signage, meters and simple payment system, and as far as I know nothing has been started on these.

    We have too many chiefs and not enough worker bees (for want of a better way of saying it in PC times) and desk jobs should not take the entire budget surplus. Infrastructure is how the majority of residents see the City at work on a day to day basis. Ignoring infrastructure to place emphasis on backroom work may come back to haunt the City planners in the future. Mental health is indeed a necessary area to explore so that would be the one area I would be happy seeing money spent, but the pot is not bottomless and financial caution is wise.

  2. Many comments attached to this article and the one yesterday on the same topic note that the city staff is bloated and often ineffective—particularly in administrative (as opposed to service) units. As only one example, I’m struck by the staffing level of the City Manager’s Office: City Manager (1.0 FTE), Deputy City Manager (1.0 FTE), Assistant City Manager (1.0 FTE), Assistant to the City Manager (3.0 FTE, with 2.0 of the 3.0 new for next year), Executive Assistant to the City Manager (1.0 FTE), Administrative Assistant (2.0 FTE). Then there are a Senior Management Analyst (1.0), Chief Communications Officer (1.0), Manager of Communications (1.0) and Senior Management Analyst (1.0 new for 2023). That’s 12.0 FTE in the City Manager’s Office proposed in the budget for next year. I wish I could honestly say that it’s unbelievable, but it is too true.

  3. ” The utility measure, meanwhile, would bolster the city’s general fund by another $7 million annually. The council would have broad discretion on how to spend these funds.”

    “Another $7 million annually” is on top of the $20,000,000 annually the city has been “overcharging” us for many, many years. They still owe us $12,500,000 from the legal judgment the judge ordered PA to repay us.

    Just say no to that. Shame on the city for pulling this sneaky ploy where they’ve hired a consultant to tweak the ballot language AND a full-time SENIOR Utility staffer to lobby us!

    Shame on them. Restore ALL the library hours to what they were.

Leave a comment