Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

A Palo Alto mother and father who paid $25,000 to facilitate cheating on their son’s SAT exams were each sentenced to prison on Thursday, April 14, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts said in a press release.

Palo Alto residents Dr. Gregory Colburn, 65, and Amy Colburn, 53, were each sentenced to two months in prison for their role in the college admissions scandal on April 14, 2022. Courtesy Getty Images.

U.S. District Court Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton sentenced Dr. Gregory Colburn, 65, and Amy Colburn, 53, each to eight weeks in prison, one year of supervised release, 100 hours of community service and ordered them each to pay a $12,500 fine. The Colburns pleaded guilty on Dec. 7, 2021, to one count each of conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud and honest services mail and wire fraud.

The couple, who initially pleaded not guilty to multiple charges, conspired with college admissions consultant William “Rick” Singer and others to cheat on their son’s SAT exam. As part of the scheme, the Colburns paid Singer $25,000 in the form of purported donations to Singer’s sham charity, the Key Worldwide Foundation. Singer bribed Igor Dvorskiy, a test administrator, to allow Mark Riddell, a test “proctor,” to secretly correct the Colburns’ son’s SAT exam answers and obtain a fraudulently inflated score.

The Colburns switched their pleas to guilty in December just weeks before they were to stand trial. They previously steadfastly denied the charges. They faced a sentence of up to 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000 or twice the gross gain or loss, whichever is greater, if convicted.

In a joint sentencing memorandum filed in federal court, lawyers for the Colburns said their clients are “deeply remorseful. The Colburns have accepted responsibility for their conduct and are prepared to accept their punishment and move on with their lives.”

And “while they had a comfortable life prior to this case, the Colburns do not remotely resemble the caricature of the typical ‘Varsity Blues’ defendant in the public view. Neither Greg nor Amy grew up with the trappings of wealth and privilege,” the sentencing memorandum said.

While they may have received just eight weeks in prison, their lives have been shattered ways that are much more permanent, according to those who know the couple.

In 27 letters of support submitted to the court on their behalf, family and colleagues described the couple as giving and loving people who were not likely to offend again and who have faced immense consequences as a result of their actions and the public notoriety. They have lost their jobs and been shunned by their friends and community, the letters said.

The couple’s eldest son said the charges call into question their parenting in the eyes of some, but they are “incredibly caring and supportive parents” and “continue to be people I look to for moral support.”

He described how his mother didn’t push him when he was disappointed and depressed by his math grades and that she tried to help him feel that such difficulties are just part of life.

Others described how Gregory Colburn, a radiation oncologist, left a more lucrative job in Seattle, Washington to serve at a nonprofit hospital, where he often cared for indigent patients.

Federal prosecutors, meanwhile, asked the court for a “meaningful” prison term for the Colburns in their sentencing memorandum. They quoted from a Jan. 26, 2015, email Amy Colburn wrote to the Palo Alto Unified School District regarding a purported cheating scandal by 10 students in an AP Calculus class at Palo Alto High School. Colburn wanted stiff academic consequences, including having all of the test scores of the 10 cheating students thrown out and for them to be given zeros.

“Since the tests are graded on a curve, this cheating scandal not only affects the cheating students, but everyone else’s grades in the class. … As a parent of a student taking this course, and for all (high-school) students and parents, it is important that the school be seen not only handing out appropriate consequences to those students who cheated but to be seen making grade reparations to all the honest students who have been adversely affected by this scandal.”

Just a few years later, the Colburns paid Singer a $25,000 fake donation to bribe two individuals to cheat on their younger son’s SAT exam, lied about the payment on their taxes and then agreed to lie to cover-up their crimes, prosecutors said.

“The audacity it took for the defendants to publicly accuse children of cheating when it disadvantaged their own son, and then privately engage in cheating, fraud and bribery to benefit their other son, encapsulates the causes of the college admissions scandal and Varsity Blues cases. For an array of reasons — self-aggrandizement, arrogance and a belief that the rules do not apply to those with wealth and privilege — the defendants knowingly chose to break the law and engage in conduct that they obviously knew was wrong,” the prosecutors wrote.

At the sentencing, Gorton addressed the Colburns: “You and many of your codefendants have already been punished for your selfish, brazen and frankly stupid conduct,” Gorton said, according to an Associated Press article. “You both have time to make it up to the ones you love, and to society in general.”

The Colburns are among a group of Bay Area residents who have or will be sentenced in the nationwide scam. Other residents who have taken plea deals and were sentenced to punishments ranging from fines with no jail time to a few months in prison with hefty fines include former Stanford University sailing coach John Vandemoer; Menlo Park residents Marjorie Klapper and Peter Jan Sartorio; Atherton residents Manuel Henriquez and Elizabeth Henriquez; Hillsborough resident Marci Palatella; former TPG Capital senior executive William McGlashan Jr., previously of Palo Alto; and Napa vintner Agustin Huneeus Jr.

Hillsborough residents Bruce and Davina Isackson have pleaded guilty but have not yet been sentenced.

Sue Dremann is a veteran journalist who joined the Palo Alto Weekly in 2001. She is an award-winning breaking news and general assignment reporter who also covers the regional environmental, health and...

Join the Conversation

11 Comments

  1. How can they deny it?! They were caught. My daughter knows the son and he’s a nice boy; this is so unfortunate but they’ll probably go to a white collar prison, perhaps the one the others went to nearby with sunbathing and activities. Another article said he was applying to U of AZ, not a low admission school.

    In psychology class in college, the professor asked us, “What would you do if you knew you couldn’t get caught?”

  2. This has been going on for decades. Some of Them finally got caught.
    Now go and catch the rest of Them. Adjust the System.
    I read that the Couple in question have this “remorse”. I think not.
    I figure they considered while practicing their Acts, that this was absolutely Normal. Simply because They could afford the privilege. And when Others could not. So it was Their “Right”.
    They consider it was One of those “Wrongs” that was actually a “Right”.
    If you still have doubt. Put yourself on the other End of what They would have done to you?
    I am sure that the 10 Children She caught “Cheating” felt “remorse” also!

    Top Minority Athletic Students were not allowed to take full advantage of Their Scholarships,
    mainly because parents of children that could not make the Teams were pitching a hissy
    fit about the Athletes Grades.
    The Children were hounded by the Parents, trying to keep them off the Team, so that maybe their Child would have a chance at the spot that would be left vacant. If & when the disadvantage minority child would fall off because of their Grades.
    Whether it be behind Sickness, Living disadvantages, Transportation etc.
    Paying a pretend donation, is just another Rich Persons privilege. A “Pay to Play” action
    throughout Life. Always meant for Them and NOT Others. “Adjust the System” to include Them.
    Have them to pay into a Scholarship for a Underprivileged Student or Students.

    They should have gotten 2yrs for Fraud and the Falsification of Records. They would have done 18 months at least. Not this Token 2 months and the rest in Shame and being Shun?
    (which also is a privilege).

  3. This is probably just scratching the surface of the problem and there are likely many, many more.

    My own kids were quite surprised at some of their cohorts who got into top colleges and yet were not the best students. They suspected cheating was going on but had no idea how it was done.

    The ones who suffer are the ones who do not get into these colleges as a result of this. They are missing out on what they have been trying to go and actually deserve to go.

    Sad

  4. Lori Loughlin was sentenced to two months in prison in August for her role in the college admissions scandal. She reported to a low-security federal facility in Dublin, California, on Friday.
    Felicity Huffman, meanwhile, was sentenced to just 14 days in prison in September for her role in the scheme.
    Huffman paid $15,000 to the scheme’s ringleader, Rick Singer, to have someone cheat on a college-entrance exam for her eldest daughter.
    Loughlin and her husband, Mossimo Giannulli, paid Singer $500,000 to guarantee her daughters’ admission to the University of Southern California.
    —-
    This Judge Gorton sounds to me to unfairly giving both of them 2 months in prison — with their $25k ‘donation’. Felicity Huffman paid $15k and received 14 days, Loughlin $500k for two of her daughters, plus SAT —

    Why are the Colburn’s here given 2 months vs Huffman 14 days?

    Felicity Huffman is not helping the community, as the Colburn’s, I agree none of this is acceptable nor admirable to do — and maybe the Colburn’s were simply fed up with seeing other children (as referenced in this article) of being unfairly treated at Paly.

    I agree this is all horrible, but, I think with the constant socially, (now acceptable), “anti-work”, and “eat the rich”, contributed to this larger sentence than Huffman and other defendants.

    I think they should pay a fine, but no prison time.

  5. They should definitely be sent to prison. Punishing the wealthy financially isn’t a real punishment when they can easily pay the fine. Sending normally law-abiding citizens to prison sends a strong message.

  6. Something is very odd with this. People who are stealing property get off because of who knows what? They don’t spend time in jail. People who are lifetime criminals seem to get no jail time at all when they’re caught because it is property crime worth less than $900. As soon as these criminals are back on the streets they start stealing again because there is no incentive for them to stop.

    I tend to think this couple have had their lives destroyed already by this and the jail time is not going to make their lives any worse than being discovered already has done. I doubt very much that they are going to commit more crime regardless of the jail sentence.

    Justice is a very strange animal.

  7. The comments here nearly excusing these two criminals are pathetic. The Colburns had other options to help their son but sadly chose a criminal path. I’m glad this article makes it clear the Colburns lost a lot. Too often the focus is on the length of the prison sentence when the reality is serious crimes like this negatively impact all aspects of the criminal’s life. It’s also unfortunate that a charity hospital lost an experienced physician. Clearly many innocent people are also affected by criminal acts like theirs.

    All of these criminal parents remind me that community college is a great option for a lot of kids. So is vocational training.

  8. To the above commenter, I am not supporting the lenient treatment of these parents. They were very much in the wrong and they have lost a lot as a result. The jail sentence although completely justified for their crime is not going to do any more than the life they have lost. Their punishment happened by them losing their status in life, rather than the time they spend in jail. The jail sentence will end, but their life will never be the same again. That is their true punishment.

    I just wish that the criminals who are stealing from us, often in our driveways, often brandishing guns, often repeat offenders, often with absolutely no morals or idea of right and wrong, were treated more harshly. The crime in Palo Alto that we read about as press releases from our PD are getting caught but not being adequately punished. That is the annoying part. Why can’t real, hardened criminals be put in jail and left there long enough for it to be a real deterrent?

  9. Bystander, comparing property crimes to federal crimes is apples and oranges. It’s unsurprising that you’re focused on outsiders committing crimes rather than your peers, hence your sympathy toward your peers.

  10. I doubt this practice is that common; this Rick Singer is the mastermind and what about him? (Sentencing soon, we’ll see) He “sang” on many others (far lesser players).
    I do think the college applicants 18+ (Therefore, adults) should have also been prosecuted; they skated.
    They signed their own college applications, after all, and knowingly posed on rowing machines, hand high scores listed in place of their own, made huge “donations” to universities like Stanford, etc., like the Loughlin daughter who claimed to be a rower (laugh!) – fully deceptive acts.
    -Now fully welcomed in Hollywood, nothing to see here, move along (social media “influencers” of great wealth)
    How about enforcing honesty on these apps.

Leave a comment