Actor and Palo Alto native James Franco has become the latest high-profile man to face sexual-misconduct allegations.

Five women, four of whom were Franco’s students and a fifth who said he was her mentor, spoke to the Los Angeles Times in a story published Thursday about “behavior they found to be inappropriate or sexually exploitative,” The Times reported.

The allegations started to emerge on social media after Franco won best actor in a comedy or musical for his role in “The Disaster Artist” at the Golden Globes on Sunday. Franco wore a “#TimesUp” pin on his lapel, a reference to a newly launched effort to combat sexual harassment, assault and abuse in the workplace.

Franco’s attorney denied the allegations to The Times. On “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert” earlier this week, Franco described allegations made on social media as “not accurate” but said he would take responsibility for any wrongful behavior.

“The things that I heard that were on Twitter are not accurate,” he said. “But I completely support people coming out and being able to have a voice because they didn’t have a voice for so long. So I don’t want to shut them down in any way.”

“If I have done something wrong,” Franco added, “I will fix it — I have to.”

On Wednesday, The New York Times canceled a discussion about “The Disaster Artist” with Franco, stating that “given the controversy surrounding recent allegations, we’re no longer comfortable proceeding in that vein.”

Franco grew up in Palo Alto and graduated from Palo Alto High School. He returned to his alma mater recently to launch and teach a monthslong film class with local high school students.

Join the Conversation

29 Comments

  1. Sue, what does that mean, “he’s one of us”? So he gets a pass? Have you read the LA Times article.

    Laws dont to have to be broken to qualify you as a scumbag

  2. I’ve always found his self importance and desperate publicity stunts off-putting.

    He says he doesn’t remember doing those things. I believe that. Very self centered people don’t pay that much attention to their effect on others, only when they are applauding.

  3. The idea that a high school known for rape culture, Title IX investigations, and sexual assault scandals celebrates its relationship with a credibly accused serial abuser is sad and, well, not surprising. Here’s an article from the Paly Voice on Franco teaching a class to high school students, mugging with the school’s celeb teacher Esther Wojcicki. https://palyvoice.com/2015/09/07/james-franco-to-teach-film-course-in-mac/ And here’s the article from last September – James Franco to Palo Alto journalism teacher: ‘You’re my hero’. http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/James-Franco-Palo-Alto-journalism-Esther-Wojcicki-12177587.php I wonder if the feeling is mutual?

  4. Why isn’t this front page news? When the same kind of thing came up last year in an alleged incident between two minors it was front page news. Last year the student was a black male and this time it’s a celebrity. Given the fact that there’s a history of soliciting 17 year olds and he was a teacher at Paly for an acting class it doesn’t seem like they really want to make it a big deal.

  5. Paly Parent,

    Now would be a great time for Paly to stand tall and issue a statement about the media stories this week. That would help turn around its anemic record on how it handles sexual harassment and assault.

    Recall a few years ago that Paly’s principal had an opportunity to address sexual harassment at the school but decided to stay silent on 20+ complaints she received, earning her a “you violated federal law” finding for her inaction. http://www.boarddocs.com/ca/pausd/Board.nsf/files/ARE25G831355/$file/PAUSD-OCRFindings-3-8-17.pdf

    Remember too Paly staff who met with a freshman girl last year who is claiming she was sexually assaulted on campus by one of the school’s star athletes.

    No one at Paly told the freshman or her mother that they could have the district launch a full investigation. Instead, Paly kept the investigation “in house” and decided not to discipline the athlete for his role in this despite the police issuing a restraining order to keep him away from her. Not feeling supported, the young woman’s mother moved her out of Paly in the middle of her freshman year.

    Paly staff kept paltry notes because they admitted they wanted to keep the details from the district, media and community. But outside investigators uncovered enough information to find that Paly should have done lots more here too. https://www.pausd.org/sites/default/files/pdf-faqs/attachments/pausdExternalReportResponseTitleIXreport20171018.pdf

  6. He was already convicted of soliciting minors when they invited him in to be with minors at the school.This is not new information. I think the parents that willingly placed their kids in his care should also be questioned. I am sure they all used it on their college applications happily.

  7. And with the increase in HPV throat cancers now being seen in young women, and the link between cervical cancers and HPV, I would definitely think twice before doing anything nowadays. Aids is also still out there.
    The schools might consider adding courses in rational thinking (and morality) to their curriculum.
    Girls are being tricked into doing stuff thinking that they won’t get pregnant or “infected” – WRONG!

  8. “Where’s that Bill Cosby pill I brought with me?” (Chris Matthews, joking, prior to interviewing Hillary Clinton). Apparently, he was thinking rape. Yet we pick on James Franco, who is one of us in Palo Alto. Too many young women trick men into thinking they are older than they are, if they want the man. Time to back off on Franco.

  9. Hollywood, showbiz itself, has never had a squeaky clean image. So I don’t see why any of this should ever surprise us.

    Of course, there are bound to be those who have used their celebrity status to gain personal satisfaction a lot more than others. But there are always been young starlets who are willing to do whatever it takes to get their big break to get into the big league.

    Now I am not saying that any of this is right and I am pleased to see that Hollywood now has to clean up its act. But whenever a young “nobody” has the chance of earning such astronomical amounts of dollars for doing in front of the camera things which the majority of us would only do in the privacy of our own bedrooms, I can’t be surprised when some demand liberties and others are willing to give.

    James Franco is, from the movies I have seen, a talented actor. I am sure that there are very many actors on the brink of stardom in Hollywood who have never made it big. Is it ever “luck” that gives them the big break or something else? For many standing in the wings of the “new” present day Hollywood, I feel sure their knees are knocking in case some of their past exploits are about to be outed. If we could go back to the days of the first silent movies, I am sure that similar things went on then that we will probably never know about.

    Showbiz, like professional sports, are about to tidy up their act and have to. That is a good thing. Unless another Harvey W surfaces, I think that for the rest, it has to come to a stage where we let bygones be bygones and just feel rest assured that the same will no longer be happening. Lessons to be learned for all.

  10. @Sue

    So you think it should be James Franco middle school? He is “one of us” ? What does that mean. Are people in Palo Alto somehow different than everyone else? what? I agree that he is a great talent but should not be exempt just because he is your neighbor.

  11. There are lots of schools named ‘Kennedy”. JFK bedded hundreds of different women, apparently…many of them threw themselves at him. Should we remove his name from these schools? Mrs. Stanford was no saint (even was accused of murder)…should we get rid of JLS? James Franco should not be a victim of a witch hunt!

  12. If they are going to rename Jordan why don’t they name it after a TRUE ROLE MODEL. There are plenty of people in this community who haven’t been accused of soliciting 17 year olds or pressuring girls to comply in uncomfortable situations. Just because you have had a successful career in show business doesn’t give you a pass. Just because you are “one of us “ doesn’t give you a pass. You can’t ignore the fact that he’s been in multiple situations that have made people uncomfortable enough to have the courage to come out publicly. It’s easy to blame the girls but the one thing all these accusations have in common is him.

  13. The chances of a school being named after Franco are zero. I don’t think he should be welcomed on to the Paly campus any more, at least until these accusations are run to ground. Why they have a mural he painted is beyond me – they painted over one, now is a good time to replace the other with a student mural.

  14. The Problem(?) of any one who makes a lot of money and is very good looking if either a male or female is that there are a lot of people who want to be a part of that Show and benefit from hanging around with the person. You can watch a Justin Beaver show and the girls are going crazy and say things like they want to have a baby with him. You can see that in the sports world with famous people like Tiger Woods who has people throwing themselves at him – used to. And the Kardashians have multiple people trying to get on the gravy train with them. It comes with show business / sports popularity / other famous people where the person has money and throws a lot of money around. There is nothing unusual about the situation we are just sensitized to it now. I think anyone at this point all are well aware that any thing they do or say will pop-up on social media. I guess that is the trade-off they take for pursuing careers in which they are selling a face, talent and skill. I feel sorry for Hollywood now as they have overstated their importance to the world. No one is buying it anymore. And all of the ladies who protested on the award shows had dresses on which were provocative – purposely so. Hypocrisy in full force.

  15. Wojicki is almost as annoying as Franco. I remember being assaulted by a male student at Paly. I punched him in the face, and he never bothered me again. Even back then the school admin was a bunch of incompetents who couldn’t adequately deal with boys of poor character. How sad that that hasn’t changed.

  16. I am glad we live in a time when people can be fired, shunned, or ruined because they are accused of violating social code, ethics, or laws. We can go straight to the punishment phase without the time, effort, and expense of proving their guilt in a formal venue or court.

  17. @Hmmm
    “I remember being assaulted by a male student at Paly. I punched him in the face, and he never bothered me again.”

    I would agree. Punching people in the face solves assault problems. Thank you for pointing out the simple and obvious solution to these James Franco assault charges.

  18. Margaret Mead, the famous (back in the day, at least) anthropologist and proponent of greater sexual freedom for women came up with a proposal regarding sexual harassment that is somewhat similar to what we now have as sexual harassment laws, but, in some ways, stricter:

    “What we need, in fact, are new taboos that are appropriate to the new society we are struggling to create—taboos that will operate within the work setting as once they operated within the household. Neither men nor women should expect that sex can be used either to victimize women who need to keep their jobs or to keep women from advancement or to help men advance their own careers. A taboo enjoins. We need one that saves clearly and unequivocally, “You don’t make passes at or sleep with the people you work with.””

    http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_vault/2017/11/22/article_by_margaret_mead_arguing_workplace_sex_should_be_made_into_a_taboo.html

    There is a significant difference between what Mead proposed and current laws, which are more in line with this:

    “In 2008, legal scholar Mary Anne Case explored the idea in the Vermont Law Review, refining it somewhat: “What I would want to focus on discouraging in the workplace is not any and all eroticism or search for sexual partners, but sex initiated between people hierarchically arranged in a direct reporting relationship with one another.””

    I think the Slate article makes interesting reading.

  19. I do not know Mr. Franco and am not writing this in defense of him per se. But I am concerned that we are immediately conflating accusations and allegations with guilt. It is important that we not inadvertently erode the principle of innocent until proven guilty.

    Also, the school’s decision is wishy-washy. Per this morning’s news they are removing the outdoor mural that can be seen by the general public but not other art that he did that is inside. Huh? Either there’s a solid reason to remove the art (all of it) or there isn’t.

  20. It’s all about appearances. Kim Diorio even stated the mural was removed because it was the most visible to the outside community. That’s what they always do. They’ll say they’re making changes, but nothing will really change. Does anyone really think that this RISE committee that the district put together will actually accomplish anything other than post updates on their meetings and they say they’ve started training, or workshops, etc… but no real change will occur

    It’s all about putting on a good face and delaying until everything blows over. Hopefully the community will not let any of these past transgressions blow over. School board and Paly administrators still have a lot of things to answer to.

Leave a comment