Town Square

Post a New Topic

Economic 'perfect storm' is brewing for local agencies

Original post made on Dec 7, 2008

For many years I have been directly involved in local government agencies or in federal programs designed to support local and state agencies.

Read the Guest Opinion here Web Link posted Friday, December 5, 2008, 12:00 AM

Comments (8)

Like this comment
Posted by Leighton Read
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Dec 7, 2008 at 7:17 pm

Good points. As steps are being taken to provide much greater transparency in private sector finance,it is good to keep in mind the importance of transparency for high impact decisions in the public sector. A public right to comment on negotiated labor agreements before they are signed is most appropriate.

Like this comment
Posted by Ralph
a resident of another community
on Dec 7, 2008 at 10:03 pm

Whenever things get tough, the first thing that comes up is taking it out on hard working city employees. The last thing we need is to turn our union contract negotiations into a political football. Anyone reading these forums knows that there are legions of the "public" who like nothing more than to bash the meager pay and benefits that our hard working employees get. Think what this would be like during sensitive negotions. Nothign would get done with the demogogary.

You should try living on the pay that most city workers get around here. Can't do it. That leads to long commutes.

And we do get pensions and health care, but that's nothing compared to the stock option plans that many around here loades up their 401k's in the fat years.

If you want the good things that city workers provide, you have to pay for it. Simple as that.

Like this comment
Posted by Common Sense
a resident of South of Midtown
on Dec 8, 2008 at 6:22 am

Let's put it this way...

more taxes and more regulation leads to less businesses and employees..

leads to less income into all levels of govt....

leads to having to cut expenses.

Simple ..just like businesses and just like families.

Like this comment
Posted by Peter Carpenter
a resident of Atherton
on Dec 8, 2008 at 8:18 am

If public employees are being paid less than market conditions, including their very generous and guaranteed retirement benefits,why not have the labor agreements which have been negotiated in secret made public before those agreements are voted on by elected officials?
Secrecy is usually used to hide something which would not stand the light of public disclosure.

Like this comment
Posted by R Wray
a resident of Palo Verde
on Dec 8, 2008 at 9:18 am

The politicians are not about to renegotiate labor contracts; it will cost them union votes.
The government cannot make "capital" improvements; it doesn't produce anything. It's all expenditures paid by taxes and these expenses should be delayed during a recession.

Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 8, 2008 at 11:30 am

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

If the total employee cost is restrained to withing 10% of equivalent wage in private employment few would object. Given my druthers I would give government employees a choice between a union contract and civil service - not both - and voluntary unionism.

Like this comment
Posted by sv
a resident of Barron Park
on Dec 8, 2008 at 7:43 pm

Enhanced employee benefits are only sustainable if the economy does well, not if there is a continued recession. While everybody is entitled to get paid fairly, Palo ALto city employees must realize that many other cities are on their way to bankruptcy because of the expensive labor contracts. Good article.

Like this comment
Posted by Right to Work
a resident of Palo Alto Orchards
on Dec 9, 2008 at 6:10 am

I actually disagree with the statement that "everyone is entitled to be paid fairly"..fair is in the eye of the market. If someone doesn't want to work for a certain wage, s/he doesn't take the job..if s/he does want the job, s/he takes it.

That is the definition of "fair", not what some bureucrat somewhere decides is "fair".

I believe in the freedom to work. I would rather be free to work for less than not work at all because someone has decided the wages offered aren't "fair".

BTW, I like the "Report Objectionable Content" section at the bottom of these, but what happens if there is a report?

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Fu Lam Mum shutters temporarily in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 1,794 views

What Are Your Gifts that Must Be Shared?
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,483 views


Best Of Palo Alto ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Best Of Palo Alto" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 21st issue of the Palo Alto Weekly.