Town Square

Post a New Topic

Hopes rekindled for new police building in Palo Alto

Original post made on May 7, 2013

Palo Alto's plan to build a new police headquarters at 3045 Park Blvd. roared back to life Tuesday afternoon when city officials and their consulting architect announced a breakthrough in designing the proposed facility, which just three weeks ago was seen as highly unlikely to meet the needs of the Police Department.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, May 7, 2013, 6:55 PM

Comments (9)

Like this comment
Posted by Lee
a resident of College Terrace
on May 7, 2013 at 10:46 pm

The current Police station is often cited as being seismically unsafe, and therefore, a new building needs to be built. This article is no exception. The current Police station occupies the ground floor of City Hall, if it is unsafe, how can the rest of the building above, be any safer? Why aren't all the other departments clamoring for seismically safe office space?

This development sounds almost too good to be true. That, combined with the fact that the police station is a so-called public benefit, leaves me wondering exactly what the city will get. Other public benefit concessions granted by city hall have amounted to; malformed car sculptures stuck around a doorway on Lytton, a bench on a corner by the hardware store, a wide sidewalk, uh, I mean 'public space' taken over by St Michaels Alley, another 'public space' taken over by another restaurant near California Avenue, and probably other similar examples. Considering all of these public benefit things have in my view been gag jokes handed over to the city in exchange for over sized developments, lets just say I'm dubious that the city will get the police station they think they might get.

Like this comment
Posted by Glass?
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on May 8, 2013 at 12:59 pm

By looking at the photos it looks like they want to build a police station with a mostly glass interior. I guess they would prefer it look pretty than actually be "defensible", a term they used three weeks ago as a mandatory parameter. Any nut can drive by and shoot into it, a bomb could explode and rain down shards of glass, etc. How about building something that protects the officers inside from the crazy people of this world?

Like this comment
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on May 8, 2013 at 11:44 pm

Has anyone looked into the feasibility of a "rear entrance" connecting to Alma Street? Hollywood stunt drivers could probably get a police car across the tracks and through the chain link fence, but I'm thinking about something a little more civilized. Not for routine use, but in those scenarios when the department may want to serve us on the east side of the tracks while Oregon Expressway is under water or otherwise impassible.

Like this comment
Posted by Gus L.
a resident of Barron Park
on May 9, 2013 at 7:43 am

Keep the Tall buildings and Congestion Downtown where it belongs.
We don't need Massive buildings in an area that cant handle it.

Like this comment
Posted by resident
a resident of Fairmeadow
on May 9, 2013 at 11:11 pm

That on-ramp from Park to Oregon eastbound is going to get even more crowded...

Like this comment
Posted by jan
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on May 10, 2013 at 10:29 am

Lee, the pd bldg is not on the ground floor of city hall. They are two separate buildings attached by council chambers. Seriously? Why do people insist on commenting on things they know nothing about.

Like this comment
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on May 10, 2013 at 10:46 am

Hi jan, this is where us lazy people come to get educated. (And get our grammar corrected.)

Like this comment
Posted by Lee
a resident of College Terrace
on May 13, 2013 at 8:47 pm

wow! I goofed on what's on top of the police station, I goofed big time.

I still stand by my comments related to the 'free' police station though. The city has been duped, willingly or otherwise, repeatedly, into some really egregious over sized buildings in exchange for some really questionable, and mostly worthless 'public benefits'. Is there any chance it won't happen again?

Maybe the current police station was a free public benefit? How else could the city either buy or build a building that is apparently a seismic disaster waiting to happen, and right under/next their noses?

Jan, I really don't know why the city keeps making massive costly blunders, that's why I commented here. Do you know why the city keeps blundering with our tax dollars?

Like this comment
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on May 13, 2013 at 10:13 pm

Do I want to hear opinions on the new Bay Bridge? Wait for HSR.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Why contentious local politics? More examples from ADU at Council
By Douglas Moran | 49 comments | 2,002 views

Food Party! 420
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 1,306 views

What Are Your Gifts that Must Be Shared?
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 474 views


Best Of Palo Alto ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Best Of Palo Alto" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 21st issue of the Palo Alto Weekly.