Town Square

Post a New Topic

Palo Alto ponders design of new bike bridge

Original post made on Dec 12, 2012

Emboldened by a $4 million grant and a freshly completed master plan, Palo Alto is rolling ahead with design work on a new bike bridge that would span U.S. Highway 101 and give residents in the south end of the city a year-round connection to the Baylands.
==B Related story:==
• [Web Link Palo Alto, Stanford win $10 million for bike bridge, trails]

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, December 12, 2012, 10:32 PM

Comments (24)

Like this comment
Posted by Commuter
a resident of South of Midtown
on Dec 12, 2012 at 11:38 pm

The old Adobe Creek path has been closed all year and residents are using the dangerous San Antonio Road overpass instead. Build whatever can be finished soonest. Looks are a minor factor. A fancy bridge over an ugly highway is still going to be ugly, and noisy and smelly, because of the cars underneath.

Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 13, 2012 at 3:31 am

In support of a design contest but would like this completed asap. There should also be an extension to Alma. If we don't do it now, it will never happen.

Like this comment
Posted by Communter
a resident of another community
on Dec 13, 2012 at 5:51 am

The new bike bridge over 101 at Ralston in Belmont is very nice. Not too fancy, but not a concrete blank stare either. No point in rushing into an ugly design in order to get it built a few months sooner since we're all going to be looking at it for decades to come.

Like this comment
Posted by resident
a resident of South of Midtown
on Dec 13, 2012 at 7:19 am

If a prettier design only takes another month, then go ahead. Don't delay a full year or more for it, though. That new pedestrian bridge new Rengstorff in Mountain View supposedly cost cost well under $10 million and it doesn't look too bad.

Like this comment
Posted by fault
a resident of Community Center
on Dec 13, 2012 at 8:35 am

You got 4 million and you want the residence to pay for the rest! No wonder your budget is out of control. I bet your project will be over 10 millions by the time it's over. The city manager is in hiding these days???

Like this comment
Posted by Brian
a resident of Evergreen Park
on Dec 13, 2012 at 9:35 am

Here is a link to the staff report from last night's meeting. It shows some graphics of the designs. I hope the link works.

Web Link

Like this comment
Posted by Actual User
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 13, 2012 at 10:30 am

Can we just build the thing quickly and get it over with? I think there are more people that really need to use this bridge than people who are going to complain about its looks. If you build it, they will come.

Like this comment
Posted by Bridges are for transport
a resident of South of Midtown
on Dec 13, 2012 at 11:14 am

What makes a good bridge is how it safely and conveniently it connects people from one place to another. How safely and conveniently does it connect south PA bicyclists and pedestrians from the street and/or sidewalk to the bay trails they want to use? Our present connections are just awful. The San Antonio overpass is dirty, loud, windy, unsafe, downright scary for families with its fast-moving, trucks and cars barreling towardthe 101. The overpass provides no place for bikes. This is unacceptable.

Please get it done as quickly as possible, minimize cost and impact on baylands. We do not want an iconic structure. We NEED a functional bike/ped bridge. We have needed it for years. It would be helpful to see a rendering of what Commissioner Keller has proposed. I find it difficult to evaluate his proposal from what I have read here.

PTC members, this is about a critical TRANSPORTATION connection. I see little evidence in this discussion that you have ridden the Lefkowitz Tunnel and/or San Antonio overpass and related bay trails. from south PA. Please do so. It will inform your understanding of how bicyclists coming from Charleston, Bayshore, East Meadow, Fabian...and more broadly south and west quadrants of Palo Alto (where I live and commute from) will use it. We need this VERY badly.

Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Dec 13, 2012 at 11:37 am

What strikes me as noteworthy is that this bridge does not need to cost Palo Alto a lot more money than the $4m grant. We should try and see if Google or any of the other businesses are willing to contribute to the cost of this bridge as it is very likely their employees who will be using the bridge more than anyone else on a regular basis.

A pleasing design is one thing, but it will hardly be a gateway to Palo Alto as it is mainly Palo Altans who will be using it. The bridge should be practical more than anything else, and not an expensive piece of artwork. Look at the bottom line for once, Palo Alto.

Like this comment
Posted by Hmmm
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Dec 13, 2012 at 11:39 am

Given how much Google offshored into tax shelters, they can cough up the bucks for it. Or ask Marky Mark & his funky bunch at Facebook. Time for corporate welfare recipients to give back to the community!

Like this comment
Posted by John Galt
a resident of Fairmeadow
on Dec 13, 2012 at 11:53 am

"Dangerous San Antonio Road overpass" ????
Have YOU ever used it? There is a sidewalk all the way across! I have biked and walked it HUNDREDS of times over the last 40 years and seem to have survived the death dealing overpass. Gimme a break! We don't need to spend 2-6 million dollars for the Liz Kniss Commerative bridge!
Get a grip!

Like this comment
Posted by Lets be Real here
a resident of South of Midtown
on Dec 13, 2012 at 12:07 pm

If the City has already promised one million to go witht he four million that should be it. If we can't build a bike bridge for five million dollars what a joke. We dont have any money to spend so lets no spend any more than we have to in order to accomplish this.

It's a freakin bike birgde not art!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Like this comment
Posted by dave
a resident of Downtown North
on Dec 13, 2012 at 12:19 pm

Another project without a source for the over $6 million to complete it, but the City continues to spend taxpayers' money to build it. I guess all it takes is for 40 or 50 bicyclists to lean heavily on the Council and City Manager, and the sky's the limit. I wonder how many council members will contribute to its cost?

An estimate was made that >70,000 people would use it each year. For 365 days that is about 80 plus round trips per day. With 62,000 residents that is a very expensive bridge for a few users. (I do recognize that it might be used more heavily on a weekend, but the principle's the same.)

Was this in the Infrastructure Blue Ribbon Commission report? Not that I know of. So the back log grows, maintenance and upkeep of another structure adds to our budget, and no money identified to cover the additional cost. What a way to run a business.

Like this comment
Posted by Scott McMahon
a resident of Menlo Park
on Dec 13, 2012 at 12:47 pm

The new bridge at over 101 near Ralston Ave in Belmont is curvy and beautiful, but it's a rotten bike bridge. The pathway is narrow and the curves make it dangerous at more than 5 mph, which is deadly slow coming down from it's high arched peak.

A pretty bridge is OK by me, but please talk to some serious bike riders and take a ride over the Belmont bridge to see what's wrong with it before finalizing the design. Let's don't lose sight of what the bridge is for. As Wright's motto goes, "Form follows Function."

Like this comment
Posted by Nick Baldo
a resident of Menlo Park
on Dec 13, 2012 at 1:10 pm

Whatever you do, please don't choose something that adds a bunch of unnecessary curls and turns for aesthetic reasons. Those of us trying to get somewhere appreciate a relatively direct path. Kudos to the city for making this happen!

Like this comment
Posted by Horselady
a resident of Community Center
on Dec 13, 2012 at 2:32 pm

A safe crossing is needed, period, and it should be done ASAP for the safety of the pedestrian and bicycling public.

Like this comment
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on Dec 13, 2012 at 4:46 pm

Bicycles and pedestrians should have separate bridges, or we'll end up requiring cyclists to walk their bikes again like the Cal Ave underpass or Oregon/101 bridge. What is the proposed bike speed limit on this new bridge when pedestrians are present?

Like this comment
Posted by Nick
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 13, 2012 at 5:17 pm

Come on,PAOnline, esp when it's a visual design thing like this, put in the visuals, design , plans, drawings, whatever they're showing on these so far.

Like this comment
Posted by Midtown Biker
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 13, 2012 at 5:28 pm

I am all in favor of improving roads for bikers, but I wish there was some way to get office buildings to treat us better at the end of the commute! The building manager at Four Seasons office complex seems determined to make sure bicycles are treated as third class citizens next to cars.

How can we encourage more bicycle commuting if the road ends in a locked garage?

Like this comment
Posted by Horselady
a resident of Community Center
on Dec 13, 2012 at 6:43 pm

Do bicycles really need a speed limit? Unless they are foolishly coasting freely downhill, of course.

Like this comment
Posted by RogueTrader
a resident of Green Acres
on Dec 13, 2012 at 8:35 pm

Dave's post a few messages earlier estimates that, on average, less than 100 users would bike per day. With 62,000 residents, that means less than 1 in 600 Palo Alto residents would use this bridge.

We're going to be paying 6 million dollars for something that only a very few will use. Unbelievable.

Like this comment
Posted by Unbelievable
a resident of Community Center
on Dec 13, 2012 at 9:07 pm

When comes to projects big or small, this city is drooling all over the plate. It doesn't require a logic!

Like this comment
Posted by Ron
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Dec 13, 2012 at 9:49 pm

Is this Liz Kniss' legacy to herself?

Like this comment
Posted by Lance
a resident of Barron Park
on Dec 15, 2012 at 4:21 am

I know there's overhead and things are tight, and that PA wants to do the best, but I've been commuting for years from PA through the Baylands, waiting and waiting for improvement - only to see us (at least those of us in South PA) fall behind most other progressive cities.

They Baylands themselves, and the business reachable through the Baylands (especially with Moffet opening up it's trails), offers PA a nice opportunity to enrich the lifestyle of its residents.

It doesn't have to cost that much, doesn't even need to be grand, I don't even care if it's dirt - just a reasonably close pass. The underpass was fine most of the time (except after a heavy rain) - still doesn't make sense to me why we didn't just keep that open.

The San Antonio overpass is not fine - not suitable for kids, or anyone, without Frogger-like reflexes willing to play timing games with the cars exiting 101 at high speeds, or face battle with big-rig trucks drifting towards your narrow sidewalk pinched against the guardrail.

If PA insits on replacing the underpass with an overpass, do it like MV just did to the south - it is more than sufficient, constructed in a more challenging space, and it didn't take nearly that long.

And if it's really not going to be done until 2017, then let us just use the underpass again!

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 15 comments | 3,723 views

Eat, Surf, Love
By Laura Stec | 4 comments | 1,230 views

Couples: So You Married Mom or Dad . . .
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,175 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 852 views

One-on-one time
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 257 views