Town Square

Post a New Topic

Effective 7/67/12, DHS can take over all private communications in "emergency"; Is this ok?

Original post made by Perspective, Greater Miranda, on Jul 30, 2012

Web Link

If I read this right, Obama signed into law, through Executive Order, of course, Dept of Homeland Security ( the name still gives me the creeps, like our "Czars") taking over all private communications in an emergency. Wired and wireless, including the internet, on July 6, just a couple weeks ago. Where was the news?

I am getting seriously creeped out, folks. The power of DC is growing exponentially over us, and I am very nervous. I don't think it is at all ok for our Feds to be able to take over the internet "in an emergency". Define emergency. Define controlling our commmunications.

What about you?

Comments (3)

Like this comment
Posted by Goodone
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 30, 2012 at 7:36 am

I clicked through and read the article. The quality of the publication is reflected in the second comment on the thread, reposted here, pointing out that this is just the tip of the iceberg - smart electric meters are the real threat to our liberty...

Could this monitor, record, control, manipulate communication - all without a warrant - be to bring down all those rf electric power meters recently put on houses? Could this "national security" pretext to invade communication be linked to using rf electric meters to determine what electrical equipment is there, who's home, when, what do they have - you bet it is! Get rid of those rf electric meters - their window into your life. They violate your privacy and reveal much to a satellite. They are also being used to issue warrants based on what they "suspect" from those meters. Fact!

Like this comment
Posted by Guvmint are bad
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Jul 30, 2012 at 10:11 am

I hear a snug fitting cap made of tin foil will keep the guvmint controlled radio waves from beaming into your brain.

It's the PUBLIC spectrum. Who do you think should control it in an emergency? AT&T?

Like this comment
Posted by Perspective
a resident of Midtown
on Jul 30, 2012 at 12:14 pm

Perspective is a registered user.

Web Link

From the WhiteHouseGov site itself, a copy of the actual Executive Order signed July 6, 2012. Try reading the whole thing..then note...

Section 5.2 e:The Secretary of Homeland Security shall satisfy priority communications requirements through the use of commercial, Government, and privately owned communications resources, when appropriate;


Ok, now then, can the snark stop and the thinking begin?
Is anyone else concerned with the language of this EO?

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


To post your comment, please login or register at the top of the page. This topic is only for those who have signed up to participate by providing their email address and establishing a screen name.

Fu Lam Mum shutters temporarily in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 3,014 views

How Does Silicon Valley’s Culture Affect Your Marriage?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 565 views


Best Of Palo Alto ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Best Of Palo Alto" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 21st issue of the Palo Alto Weekly.