Town Square

Post a New Topic

Overtime costs necessary, but still too high

Original post made on Dec 6, 2007

By working extra hours in 2006, Palo Alto Police Agent Adrienne Moore earned nearly $210,000, $18,000 more than Police Chief Lynne Johnson.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, November 30, 2007, 12:00 AM

Comments (7)

Like this comment
Posted by JV
a resident of Meadow Park
on Dec 6, 2007 at 5:45 pm

Only in government do you get this nonsense.

Like this comment
Posted by Jenny
a resident of South of Midtown
on Dec 6, 2007 at 9:24 pm

Adrienne Moore should be commended; she is basically doing two jobs. She is a Police Officer and works in the Dispatch Center on her days off. Both of these jobs require a high degree of proficiency and many months of training. However, she receives only one set of benefits (pension, vacation time, sick leave etc), which actually saves the City money.

Like this comment
Posted by Citizen
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 6, 2007 at 9:29 pm

Is this some kind of scheme that will let her get a higher pension? Do the overtime hours count towards her maximum pension?

Like this comment
Posted by Tim
a resident of Crescent Park
on Dec 6, 2007 at 10:57 pm

Overtime hours do NOT count towards a higher pension. They use the highest year of your last three years at your regular rate. So if you worked 25 years and your salary is $100,000 per year, you would receive a pension base on 3% x the number of years on the job (30), your pension would be $75,000.

Like this comment
Posted by Tim
a resident of Crescent Park
on Dec 6, 2007 at 10:59 pm

That 30 should be 25 years.

Like this comment
Posted by Adam
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Dec 10, 2007 at 12:29 pm

This article is full of sound and no substance. The attention grabbing headline concerning Ms. Moore was not referred to again. After citing the costs and reasons for overtime, no recommendation was made by the editor to improve the situation. However, Mr. Marinaro, Ms. Johnson, and Ms. Erickson gave information on how they try to rein in overtime and what constraints they work under.

Please, Mr. Editor, reorder your article and put the important things first before adding so many extraneous details the message is lost.

Like this comment
Posted by Alex
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Dec 11, 2007 at 6:23 am

Overtime is financially beneficial to the City. The alternative would be to hire more firefighters and more police officers which add to the City's payroll. Overtime benefits the City because they only have to pay out one set of benefits, but this is not explained in the PAW article.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Why contentious local politics? More examples from ADU at Council
By Douglas Moran | 49 comments | 2,179 views

Food Party! 420
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 1,574 views

What Are Your Gifts that Must Be Shared?
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 663 views


Best Of Palo Alto ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Best Of Palo Alto" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 21st issue of the Palo Alto Weekly.