Post a New Topic
Original post made
by Bye bye LaDoris, Charleston Gardens,
on Sep 10, 2007
As I consider the actions of the Council I am reminded of the story "The Ugly Americans" where building edifices was considered a better use of aid money than something ugly like improving the breed of chickens.
Of course our City Council doesn't want to deal with the "real issues" like infrastructure; it is an election year and four of them will be out of office by the end of the year. This is a lame duck City Council
Is that lame duck, or just "lame"? What a disappointment. Why can't we get pot-hole-fillers instead of these pipedreamers? Don't we have anybody who wants to do the work?
I wish that the standard for removing criticism of city hall from this forum was the same as the standard for removing criticism of the president.
Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 16 comments | 4,189 views
The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 958 views
This time we're not lying. HONEST! No, really!
By Douglas Moran | 4 comments | 425 views
Couples: When Wrong Admit It; When Right; Shut Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 406 views
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 381 views
Home & Real Estate
Send News Tips
Express / Weekend Express
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2018 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.