Town Square

Post a New Topic

Open Space District launches massive 'vision plan'

Original post made on Mar 27, 2013

A vision plan to determine how the public wants open space to be used was launched by the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District on Tuesday, March 26.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, March 27, 2013, 9:54 AM

Comments (7)

Like this comment
Posted by access
a resident of Downtown North
on Mar 27, 2013 at 10:17 am

Open space is great, but the biggest improvement it needs right now is better accessibility without encouraging private car use. Almost all the open space is west of Hwy 280, while most of the population lives east of Hwy 280. Safe non-car routes across the highway are very limited and even if you do make it across, the roads to the open space are generally very narrow with no shoulders or sidewalks and too many speeding cars. Public transit is non-existent. I hope the open space district can work with local communities to improve access routes to our open space so that the general public can enjoy it more without the pollution of private cars.

Like this comment
Posted by Hilary
a resident of JLS Middle School
on Mar 27, 2013 at 10:46 am

I love, appreciate, and utilize the open space that we have on the Peninsula. I remain amazed at the vision the MPOSD founders had in preserving open space before it got gobbled up.

Thanks you MPOSD (and the other local land trusts).

My only suggestions are to make expand the preserve trails system and involve the community more. Looks like this process is under way!

Like this comment
Posted by resident
a resident of Barron Park
on Mar 27, 2013 at 11:32 am

While I appreciate the open spaces, I feel they are going too far. We need to encourage local holisic farms and maybe even some dense affordable housing. Also watch TED talk Web Link to learn more, though it applies more to grasslands.

Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 27, 2013 at 11:39 am

I would like to see better facilities at the Baylands. The interpretive center is closed and that is a big shame. I would also like to see better bathroom facilities there.

The other thing is bikes and hikers sharing the same trails. It is a problem in many areas. If you have families hiking together who keep having to get away from groups on bikes it is hard to enjoy nature. There are also problems when groups of bikers going in opposite directions meet each other, particularly when hikers are around. The trails are often not wide enough for two way traffic as well as hikers. Many trails have not been well thought out for the volume of users at popular times. I think there should be some trails that are bikes only and others that are hikers only.

Like this comment
Posted by Good job open space
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Mar 27, 2013 at 1:40 pm

Good job Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District.

The parks are accessible enough. Turning them into amusement parks with huge parking lots and what have you is not a good idea. The main purpose is to protect nature and wildlife and allowing the public to enjoy them in as natural a state as possible.

As to dense housing... in the hills? Do you want our area to become the next LA with hills built up and no nature left?

Let's be serious. Not here!

Like this comment
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on Mar 29, 2013 at 12:18 am

Maybe it's a misconception but I believe plenty of the open space along the coast is in the form of conservation easements, i.e. the development rights have been purchased by a conservation organization, but the land is still privately owned by farmers or ranchers who farm or ranch or may sell to others to farm or ranch. A win-win solution in my book, but no fun for land speculators, real estate agents, or tax assessors. Can anyone point me to a statistical summary? I'll note that the 60,000 MROSD acres are only 4 percent of the land area of the 3 counties. I'm hoping the other 96 percent won't be completely paved over.

Like this comment
a resident of Barron Park
on May 30, 2014 at 8:51 am

Land is already scarce enough around here and there is plenty of protected open space. Regular people want to live in the hills also. Stop buying up all the land so only the super rich can afford it!!!!!!

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Fu Lam Mum shutters temporarily in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 3,340 views

How Does Silicon Valley’s Culture Affect Your Marriage?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 756 views


Best Of Palo Alto ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Best Of Palo Alto" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 21st issue of the Palo Alto Weekly.