Town Square

Post a New Topic

#1 priority for our city council

Original post made by Not an issue, Community Center, on Jan 8, 2013

The top priority for our council should be to pass a mandatory occupancy law. A concerned citizen, on another thread, has expressesed concern that "foreigners" are buying homes in PA using, in his opinion without any proof, illicit funds. He is also concerned that these houses remain empty, thus denying him neighbors.
The city must act. To curb this scourge, the city must act by passing a law mandating that all homes be occupied a certain number of days each year.
Our city has never been worried about free market issues or private property rights, so it is natural that they step in and force people to live In homes x days a year. No more excess vacation or long trips for our residents. Better find a renter for that property soon or else you willbe in violation!!
I am sure all the "civic minded" citiZens will line up behind this measure

Comments (6)

Like this comment
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on Jan 9, 2013 at 5:41 am

@Not an issue, what other monikers have you used on PA Online? Reading your posts on other subjects might help me understand your viewpoint here. (Though "anonymous", I have always stuck with just this one member name through the years.)

Tangential to this foreign ownership issue, I will note that other state governments do indeed regulate who can own land, particularly farmland in the midwest. Governments can and will act when they perceive a threat to the economy.

If some multinational corporation began buying up block after block of Palo Alto homes, the Realtors and sellers and tax collectors might think it's great, but the rest of us would keep a concerned eye on it. It's ridiculous to say that it's none of our business who our neighbors are.

Like this comment
Posted by really
a resident of Community Center
on Jan 9, 2013 at 7:57 am

There are houses that empty for years in Palo Alto for many reasons. Do you need an address to check them out one by one?

Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jan 9, 2013 at 8:01 am

It may not matter to the City Council as long as all taxes and utilities are being paid. It may however be of more interest to PAUSD as students may be registered as living there.

Like this comment
Posted by Crescent Park Dad
a resident of Crescent Park
on Jan 10, 2013 at 5:31 pm

Don't be ridiculous. Or perhaps that was your point?

Like this comment
Posted by Not an issue
a resident of Community Center
on Jan 10, 2013 at 5:42 pm

CPD--check out this thread:

Web Link

Read Chris' comments. I was suggesting a solution to this scourge that is plaguing our city.
Don't you think it is a top priority issue? Are you not civic minded?

Like this comment
Posted by can't you tell this is sarcasm?
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Jan 11, 2013 at 1:55 pm

This was meant to be sarcastic (at least I assume and hope so...)

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 2,678 views

Eat, Surf, Love
By Laura Stec | 3 comments | 998 views

Couples: So You Married Mom or Dad . . .
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 974 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 2 comments | 619 views