Town Square

Post a New Topic

Bill to curb texting behind the wheel moves ahead

Original post made on Aug 29, 2012

A proposal by state Sen. Joe Simitian to raise fines for drivers who text while behind the wheel passed through the state Senate Tuesday afternoon and now heads to Gov. Jerry Brown's desk.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, August 29, 2012, 9:56 AM

Comments (16)

Like this comment
Posted by Won't Work Joe
a resident of Barron Park
on Aug 29, 2012 at 10:08 am

This is nonsense. At any red light you can spot them, the people dropping their heads to play on their phones. You see people talking on handhelds while driving all the time as well. Every day, every time I'm in the car for more than about 10 minutes. We need a group like MADD to form in order to lobby against the phone companies lobbyists.
If its as dangerous as drunk driving, we should copy the punishments that have lead to the decline of drunk driving. Huge fines, jail/community service, license suspension, points on the driving record, weekly education classes, increased insurance rates. This is what's needed to curb this behavior.

Like this comment
Posted by tougher penalties
a resident of Stanford
on Aug 29, 2012 at 10:22 am

I know 2 people (pedestrians) who were killed by drivers using cell phones. One was texting while driving when he hit my friend. I agree with the previous comment that penalties and enforcement need to be much tougher. Adding points for cell phone offenses is a first step, but this needs to go much further. I hope that Sen. Simitian and Gov. Brown aren't taking "campaign contributions" from the cell phone industry to keep these penalties low.

Like this comment
Posted by robit noops
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Aug 29, 2012 at 11:16 am

I agree, this is crap. Why not move the fine for first offenders from $20 to $150? Add a 3 strikes clause that if you are caught 3 times your license is suspended for 3 months? I see people texting and driving every day so it is obvious that people who text don't take this serious. It is pretty pathetic.

I stopped texting people years ago, I got tired of being interrupted by "how r u?" and other stupid things. It is usually a waste of time.

Like this comment
Posted by KP
a resident of South of Midtown
on Aug 29, 2012 at 11:17 am

Jack up those ticket prices so people HAVE to stop. It should be the price of a carpool ticket on the first violation! LET"S GET THIS DONE!
I know someone who got a talking ticket one day, and a texting ticket the very next day, by the same cop in the same area! My daughter got a talking ticket and now just uses speaker phone.
I, just like >Won't Work Joe, see people EVERY DAY on their phones...all ages. I honk at people and shake my phone at them. They probably laugh and keep talking.
But if we can see it so much and so easily, why don't the cops??!!

Like this comment
Posted by Scholar
a resident of Menlo Park
on Aug 29, 2012 at 11:22 am

I suspect the CTIA, the big cell vendors, and others have lobbied hard to keep these fines low. It's interesting that they worked hard to put up cell towers along highways so drivers and others in vehicles get signals. It's like the U.S. booze industry.

Like this comment
Posted by Huh?
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 29, 2012 at 11:50 am

I see nothing wrong with texting at a red light, while stopped. However, I have noticed that so many drivers do this that when the light turns green, there is a pause before they begin driving, which has resulted in me missing a green light due to the lapse in time. I doubt any policeman would ticket anyone who is texting while stopped at a light. Keep those cell phones higher, so you can watch the light turn green at the same time!

To text while driving, there is no way a driver can watch the road simultaneously. Yes, driver's ought to be cited for texting while driving!

In the end, unfortunately, there aren't enough policemen to enforce the law.

Like this comment
Posted by Garden Gnome
a resident of Crescent Park
on Aug 29, 2012 at 12:33 pm

How about a bill that requires a fine of $15,000 for every bill introduced by Joe Simitian that adds nothing to society, and another $100,000 for every bill introduced by Sen. Simitian that just increases fines for some activity he's already tried to ban anyway.

Like this comment
Posted by KP
a resident of South of Midtown
on Aug 29, 2012 at 12:39 pm

@ Garden Gnome - ??? Not sure if you mean that the fine is so low that it means nothing or that the bill in general means nothing?
I think the bill is good, but the fines are WAY TOO LOW - the people caught should FEEL THE PAIN when paying that ticket!!
I JUST sat at a red light while this broad was yakking on the phone. I just shook my head and then blasted my music! HAHAHAHA!

Like this comment
Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on Aug 29, 2012 at 1:18 pm

I'm curious how a $30 fine becomes $199. What are these "other penalties and fees"? I thought the fine was supposed to be the penalty. If we are reimbursing the government an amount of $169 to collect a $30 check, I'd say something needs to be outsourced here.

Like this comment
Posted by Noel
a resident of Crescent Park
on Aug 30, 2012 at 8:43 am

Texting is the new DUI and may start killing as many people. The penalties for texting while driving should be the same as for DUI. Texting while stopped at a light should not be illegal though it can be a major discourtesy.

Like this comment
Posted by Simitian-Is-Clueless
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 30, 2012 at 8:45 am

The LAPD seems to have their own idea about how to deal with people who are using their cell phones when driving:

Web Link

Joe Simitian can take a bow, for he's a part of this injustice to this woman. Let's hope the cops involved end up losing their jobs, and spending some time behind bars. But somehow, I expect Simitian will not see his part in this.

He has failed to do adequate research using real data, to back up his claims about cellphones and driving.

Like this comment
Posted by Crescent Park Dad
a resident of Crescent Park
on Aug 30, 2012 at 12:21 pm

@ Clueless: Really? She was an idiot. The cops over-reacted to her being an idiot. The cell phone law had nothing to do with the f-bombing idiot and the over-reaction by the officers.

Nice try.

Like this comment
Posted by Simitian-Is-Clueless
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Aug 30, 2012 at 12:51 pm

> The cell phone law had nothing ..


No cell phone law .. no pull over. The cop's behavior was clearly an over-reaction to her language, but there is little in this situation that suggests she was endangering anyone.

This is another of Joe Simitian's nanny state mindset. This community, and state, is not well-served by this control freak.

Like this comment
Posted by robit noops
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Aug 30, 2012 at 4:30 pm

"Theres nothing wrong with texting while stopped at a light"- that is such a Palo Alto statement trying to push the envelope on every issue. If you are operating a vehicle, ie behind the steering wheel with the engine on, then you should be applying your full attention.

as for the lady who got stopped for talking on the cell, then smashed by the police, she shouldnt have mouthed off, and should have known you dont get out of the car during a traffic stop unless told by the officers. her actions probly made her appear to be a meth/crackhead. for the officers, they should have just tazered her a few times.

Like this comment
Posted by lazlo
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Aug 30, 2012 at 4:44 pm

Joe Simitian continues to regurgitate his same old bills. We got it Joe! Guess Joe was sitting around with nothing to do and came up this epiphany. What, if any, ideas does Joe have to increase employment in California, bring the California deficit down, fix the California education system, stop needless deficit spending, etc.,etc....
It would seem Joe is locked into his one track thinking that only serves Joe and getting himself on the 5 o'clock news. What a pity!

Like this comment
Posted by GoodLaw
a resident of Mountain View
on Sep 4, 2012 at 1:34 pm

When the fine is $20, don't forget all of the fees assessed on top of the $20 by the court that will bring it up to $140 or higher depending on where you were stopped.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Fu Lam Mum shutters temporarily in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 2,486 views


Best Of Palo Alto ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Best Of Palo Alto" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 21st issue of the Palo Alto Weekly.