Town Square

Post a New Topic

Police have Walgreens fire video evidence

Original post made on Jul 12, 2007

Palo Alto Police Sgt. Sandra Brown confirmed Wednesday the department has video evidence related to the devastating Walgreens fire, but emphasized that does not mean the arson case is easily solvable. "We have all kinds of video," Brown said. "Everybody's making the assumption the videotape shows something.

Read the full story here Web Link

Comments (7)

Like this comment
Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jul 12, 2007 at 4:06 pm

So, cctv can help to solve crime, as pro my post on the kids, matches and the dish fire thread.

Like this comment
Posted by Big Brother
a resident of Downtown North
on Jul 13, 2007 at 1:22 pm

I *totally* agree. In fact, people should be required to carry RFID tags that allow law enforcement to track where they go. If Walgreens had a sensor, then we would know who it is. Come to think of it, if there were sensors at every store and street corner downtown, we would know exactly how the person got there. However, someone wanting to commit a crime would not carry their RFID card, so I suggest we surgically implant them in all babies at birth. Catch my drift?

Like this comment
Posted by asdf
a resident of Stanford
on Jul 14, 2007 at 1:49 am

Who wants to bet that it was one of the many homeless people who hassle passerby and urinate on the streets? There is a whole gang of them who hang out near Starbucks and Walgreens.

Like this comment
Posted by jkl;
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Jul 14, 2007 at 2:48 am

Not me. Your reasoning is horribly offensive. Now that you've agitated me, my money is on a "have" not a "have not".

Like this comment
Posted by asdf
a resident of Stanford
on Jul 17, 2007 at 11:39 am

"my money is on a "have" not a "have not".

I'm glad you're not on our police force. You've seen too many episodes of Law and Order, in which the criminal is always a doctor or businessman.

Reality is different. After all, if "poverty" causes crime -- something you would probably agree with -- one would expect the poor to commit crime at a higher rate, no? :)


Web Link

The criminality of 100 homeless and 100 domiciled jail inmates was compared. Homeless jail inmates were significantly more likely than domiciled jail inmates to be mentally ill, to be arrested for nuisance offenses, to have more extensive criminal histories, and to have prior arrests for use of weapons, drugs, and alcohol. Suggestions for processing homeless offenders are given.

Like this comment
Posted by jkl;
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Jul 17, 2007 at 1:05 pm

I've never watched any of those "Law and Order" type police shows. I'm more of a PBS viewer. Maybe you've been watching too much TV??

Reality is that you can't generalize, or rather you can, but you'll be wrong often enough that I'm glad YOU'RE not on the police force. People are individuals; crimes are specific. Jumping to erroneous and offensive conclusions because of some broad-brushed generalization doesn't solve crimes.

Like this comment
Posted by eric
a resident of Mountain View
on Jul 17, 2007 at 2:19 pm

asdf, did you actually READ the article you referenced? I do not believe it makes your case in the slightest

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 16 comments | 4,554 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 1,038 views

This time we're not lying. HONEST! No, really!
By Douglas Moran | 9 comments | 631 views

Couples: When Wrong Admit It; When Right; Shut Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 512 views

One-on-one time
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 439 views