Town Square

Post a New Topic

Where the Palo Alto City Council candidates stand on housing

Original post made on Sep 26, 2022

The candidates propose how Palo Alto should plan for meeting a state mandate of 6,000 more housing units while keeping single-family neighborhoods' character and incentivizing affordable housing.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, September 15, 2022, 8:57 AM

Comments (1)

Posted by PaloAltoVoter
a resident of Crescent Park
on Sep 26, 2022 at 3:07 pm

PaloAltoVoter is a registered user.

Julie is quoted above as saying “I prefer market ( BMR included at 15% or higher) over 100% affordable, because it pencils out and because we need to undo the vestiges of a discriminatory past …”

Julie has talked about not wanting to focus on affordable housing but to focus on inclusionary market rate housing. She talks at length about a mix of housing types in our neighborhoods. This should be a huge alarm for everyone.

Palo Alto requires 15% of the units of a market rate project to be below market rate units. Using inclusionary housing, in order to get to our state mandated ~3000 BMR units, Palo Alto would need to build 20,000 units of housing. 20,000!

This is so far beyond the bounds of reasonableness I can not support any candidate who thinks this is the way to meet these mandates. 20,000 new housing units would create a highly urbanized Palo Alto, unrecognizable to the voters living here. It would have to raze and rebuild current neighborhoods or completely remove Palo Alto business districts. We would no longer be a nice family town with good schools. Our urban forest would be a distant memory in the shade of a major cities tall buildings.

Not the Palo Alto I want to see. I’ll be voting for other candidates.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Palo Alto Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

'Working from home’ — a new work world creates societal problems.
By Diana Diamond | 50 comments | 3,658 views

Silicon Valley’s next meat substitute is being grown at a Morgan Hill mushroom lab
By The Peninsula Foodist | 2 comments | 2,854 views

Our First Anniversary in my Husband’s Retirement
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,369 views


Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund

For the last 29 years, the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund has given away more than $9 million to local nonprofits serving children and families. 100% of the funds go directly to local programs. It’s a great way to ensure your charitable donations are working at home.