Town Square

Post a New Topic

Plan for condominium development near Greer Park wins support

Original post made on May 26, 2022

A proposal to build a condominium community next to Greer Park appears to be on the fast track toward approval thanks to new housing laws and a vote of support on Wednesday from the planning commission.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, May 26, 2022, 9:09 AM

Comments (7)

Posted by Bystander
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on May 26, 2022 at 11:10 am

Bystander is a registered user.

I have no comments on this but it is very noisy there and parking will be a must. It is already hard to park at Greer Park for sports activities and if the residents park their cars in the park it will make for difficulties for park users.

Bayshore is not easy to drive at present as many are avoiding the Express Lane mess on 101 by diverting to Bayshore and there is much more traffic than before. This might be something not expected when the plans were drawn.


Posted by Observer
a resident of Menlo Park
on May 26, 2022 at 3:47 pm

Observer is a registered user.

I take it each condo has three floors. Will they each have an elevator so the elderly and handicapped are not prevented from buying a condo. Curious as to how ADA regs might impact the housing. If the city is making any concessions to the developer to get the so called low market units I would think there would be even more of a case for accessibility. If no elevators I wonder what the potential is for ADA law suits and delay of or stopping this needed housing.


Posted by Anne
a resident of Midtown
on May 27, 2022 at 11:26 am

Anne is a registered user.

I guess if buyers are OK with living next to the freeway, with all the noise and pollution they will be exposed to, more power to them.

Folks who live along Colorado and Amarillo are going to have to get used to a lot more noise and traffic than they are currently used to, because this is a terrible location if you want access to mass transit. I live on Loma Verde and the Sterling Park development at the end of the street doubled the density of Loma Verde Ave. housing in one fell swoop with it's ~100 units.

I would support propositions designed to rein in these unconstitutional new housing laws that take away local control.


Posted by mjh
a resident of College Terrace
on May 27, 2022 at 4:39 pm

mjh is a registered user.

Those who advocate for Palo Alto to add the 6000 new housing units as mandated by the state want housing built irrespective of available neighborhood amenities, city infrastructure, freeway and train noise, or elevators. Sacramento has now mandated that if a proposed housing development meets minimal standards the city must issue building permits. Just because they are not appealing or up to some people's standards, that's no reason to deny someone else the opportunity of being able to live in them.


Posted by Online Name
a resident of Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on May 27, 2022 at 5:57 pm

Online Name is a registered user.

Thank you, mjh, for speaking some much-needed common sense.


Posted by Citizen
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on May 28, 2022 at 1:16 am

Citizen is a registered user.

This is a perfect place for such a development.

Observer,
I wonder if developers build these tall skinny homes to avoid elevators etc and thus maximizing their return.

Palo Alto has long acted as if disability isn’t part if it’s inclusionary housing aspirations or urban planning. The powers that be think if a few things here or there are minimally accessible, that’s enough, universal design unischmersal design.

Given the jobs available here and the difficulties those with disabilities face to get employment, I’m still shocked at how housing development around here is perennially so unsuitable for people with mobility limitations.

Good catch. I didn’t see that. Not sure what one can do. It’s good news about office to housing conversion.


Posted by William Hitchens
a resident of Mountain View
on May 31, 2022 at 5:47 pm

William Hitchens is a registered user.

Appropriate for medium density "infill" housing. It'll be "nice and quiet" due to the proximity to Hwy 101. That's where PA should be building all of its "infill" housing --- where no one sensible wants to live. South El Camino Real also is an ideal candidate up to Page Mill.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Palo Alto Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Pescadero’s farmworkers can’t afford the food they’re growing for the Peninsula
By The Peninsula Foodist | 4 comments | 2,728 views

“To get the full value of joy . . .
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,830 views

We need an audit of city spending
By Diana Diamond | 7 comments | 1,819 views

 

Register today to support local nonprofits

The 38th annual Moonlight Run and Walk is Friday evening, September 9. Proceeds go to the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund, benefiting local nonprofits that serve families and children in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties. Join us under the light of the full Harvest Moon on a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon. Complete your race in person or virtually to support local nonprofits.

Register Now!