Town Square

Post a New Topic

Should sexually violent convict, deemed 'no longer a threat' by the state, be housed in East Palo Alto?

Original post made on Dec 2, 2021

The release from prison of a man with a history as a "sexually violent predator" and his proposed placement by the state in an East Palo Alto neighborhood are stirring up opposition.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, November 30, 2021, 6:50 PM

Comments (4)

Posted by Resident
a resident of Midtown
on Dec 2, 2021 at 3:10 am

Resident is a registered user.

Echoes of Waukesha.
Who, specifically, from "the Department of State Hospitals" wants to release this person and why are they focusing on this now?
If it's part of a broad "equity" initiative then they have their priorities backwards and have no right to release this person into a neighborhood they don't live in.


Posted by Jennifer
a resident of another community
on Dec 2, 2021 at 8:11 am

Jennifer is a registered user.

Sexually violent predators will always be a threat to any community, regardless of age, etc. If you don't know a horse, look at its track record. They should never see the light of day again. Quit coddling criminals and care about law abiding citizens. EPA has a right to be concerned.


Posted by Palo Alto Res
a resident of Downtown North
on Dec 7, 2021 at 3:12 pm

Palo Alto Res is a registered user.

Jacee Lee Dugard's story of being kidnapped and raped for 18 years under Phillip Garrido when he was allowed out on parole as a violent sex offender should be a warning sign to all parents with kids near this person.

Why in the world is this violent sex offender not being deemed a threat? That is exactly how Phillip Garrido was let out on parole into the community, where he then kidnapped and raped Jacee Lee Dugard for almost 2 decades, keeping the girl in his backyard shed while parole officers repeatedly failed to rescue Jacee Lee Dugard.
Web Link


Posted by Palo Alto Res
a resident of Downtown North
on Dec 7, 2021 at 3:16 pm

Palo Alto Res is a registered user.

I wonder if this violent sexual offender was housed nextdoor to Judge Finigan's home or his children's home or his grand children's home, would Judge Finigan still stand by his decision then regarding this violent sexual offender no longer being deemed a threat?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Palo Alto Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

The Economics of Residential Rooftop Solar
By Sherry Listgarten | 60 comments | 6,763 views

Why Give Up Delicious Things?
By Laura Stec | 23 comments | 2,762 views

Business tax in Palo Alto
By Steve Levy | 5 comments | 2,322 views

Is Watching Porn Considered to be Cheating?
By Chandrama Anderson | 6 comments | 1,550 views

Sutter andPAMF --protect your patients from coronavirus -- not just your employees
By Diana Diamond | 5 comments | 1,447 views