Town Square

Post a New Topic

Man allegedly threatens to shoot police after causing disturbance, vandalism

Original post made on Nov 8, 2021

A man led Palo Alto police on a harrowing foot chase and standoff after they tried to arrest him for smashing car windows at Stanford Shopping Center on Friday. He also repeatedly threatened to shoot officers, police said.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, November 8, 2021, 5:09 PM

Comments (4)

Posted by Paly02
a resident of Crescent Park
on Nov 8, 2021 at 6:06 pm

Paly02 is a registered user.

Thank you for not releasing his name. I see you said "police said x" at least once during the article, which is helpful. However, can you make it more readily apparent to us readers that you are using the police press release as your sole source? Perhaps saying "police said x" more often or having some kind of disclaimer in the beginning?


Posted by TimR
a resident of Downtown North
on Nov 8, 2021 at 9:04 pm

TimR is a registered user.

What where they going to do if they were right, and he did try to use an Uber as a getaway car? Just let him get into the car, and possibly attack the driver? That part doesn't sound like it was handled properly.


Posted by Jim Lange
a resident of Los Altos Hills
on Nov 9, 2021 at 9:24 am

Jim Lange is a registered user.

Sounds like another mental-illness case...smashing car windows while supposedly waiting for a ride and during the interim, spitting at store windows & yelling at shoppers?

The suspect was fortunate that the PAPD didn't gun him down after he threatened them with an undisclosed firearm.


Posted by Bob M.
a resident of Greenmeadow
on Nov 9, 2021 at 11:03 am

Bob M. is a registered user.

You do a disservice to our community by not publishing names of those arrested unless the DA decides to prosecute them. An arrest is a fact. Report it—all of it, including the identity of the arrestee. The decision to prosecute is a separate incident which you should report accordingly. Just as an arrest doesn’t prove guilt, a lack of prosecution doesn’t confirm innocence, nor does it mean that a crime didn’t occur. It may mean only that the DA chooses to expend limited time, personnel, and resources on other cases. The Weekly seems to believe that its readers can’t understand such distinctions, so it has to help them by concealing certain facts. That’s not an attractive attitude in a news organization.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Palo Alto Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

The Economics of Residential Rooftop Solar
By Sherry Listgarten | 60 comments | 6,773 views

Why Give Up Delicious Things?
By Laura Stec | 23 comments | 2,778 views

Business tax in Palo Alto
By Steve Levy | 5 comments | 2,336 views

Is Watching Porn Considered to be Cheating?
By Chandrama Anderson | 6 comments | 1,575 views

Sutter andPAMF --protect your patients from coronavirus -- not just your employees
By Diana Diamond | 5 comments | 1,471 views