Town Square

Post a New Topic

As police encrypt their radios, Palo Alto eyes new measures to boost transparency

Original post made on Apr 1, 2021

Facing a fresh claim of excessive force by a police officer and ongoing concerns about transparency within Palo Alto police, the City Council will consider on Monday new measures to improve oversight in the department.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, April 1, 2021, 9:15 AM

Comments (14)

Posted by Barron Parker Too
a resident of Barron Park
on Apr 1, 2021 at 1:16 pm

Barron Parker Too is a registered user.

The "racial justice" demands pretend that racial injustice is a significant issue in Palo Alto.

It is not. These demands are simply a way to attempt to hobble the police in their basic function to protect the community from criminals. To protect the community, it is necessary to encrypt these communications to prevent criminals from using internal police information. Full stop.

This is not a question of "transparency," unless by "transparency" the activists mean letting the criminals know what the police are doing IN REAL TIME. The PAPD is entirely correct that these communications need to be encrypted, for both the efficiency of their work and the safety of all of us. As the police departments throughout the county are doing.


Posted by pearl
a resident of another community
on Apr 1, 2021 at 1:55 pm

pearl is a registered user.

Thank you Barron Parker Too, that's exactly where it's at. Your comments are spot on. Much appreciated.


Posted by Dustin Taylor
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 1, 2021 at 2:00 pm

Dustin Taylor is a registered user.

Encrypted PD frequencies should not be a public outcry issue.

The only ones that listen to PD dispatches are most likely crooks and boring old
people with scanners who have nothing better to do with their time.


Posted by No heat
a resident of Fairmeadow
on Apr 1, 2021 at 2:18 pm

No heat is a registered user.

Encrypted PD frequencies mean that we lose the one piece of transparency we had. I don't listen, but reporters do, and that's part of how we know what happens around here. Given the serious problems the PAPD has with racism and excessive use of force, I'd prefer as much transparency as possible.


Posted by Consider Your Options.
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 1, 2021 at 2:21 pm

Consider Your Options. is a registered user.

Actually, the news media also watches police radio, so I think there is legitimate concern about transparency. They need to make real progress on how they are going to make ALL radio communication available to the public in a timely way, especially when complaints are made against the department.

We arm officer and give them a lot of authority in our community. While the vast majority of officers conduct themselves with professionalism and good intent, there are bad eggs in any field. We have a responsibility to monitor how authority and power is used by the officers to whom we, the people, have given it.


Posted by Mondoman
a resident of Green Acres
on Apr 1, 2021 at 11:27 pm

Mondoman is a registered user.

Streaming communications online (perhaps with a modest delay such as 30 minutes or an hour to minimize usefulness to crooks) sounds like a good workaround.


Posted by felix
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Apr 2, 2021 at 8:11 am

felix is a registered user.

Not only are there critical access to information and transparency issues at stake here, but also First Amendment concerns.

Council must reverse Jonsen’s unilateral overreach and adopt a less onerous solution - there is too much to lose.

Chief Jonsen needs to be clear that no one elected him to make policy for the city. In a democracy, police don’t do that.


Posted by James Miranda
a resident of Leland Manor/Garland Drive
on Apr 2, 2021 at 8:16 am

James Miranda is a registered user.

#"Chief Jonsen needs to be clear that no one elected him to make policy for the city. In a democracy, police don’t do that."

Concurring...only in a police state or despotic dictatorship.

The PAPD answers to the public, not the other way around.


Posted by Alonzo Bettencourt
a resident of another community
on Apr 2, 2021 at 9:38 am

Alonzo Bettencourt is a registered user.

"IN REAL TIME. The PAPD is entirely correct that these communications need to be encrypted, for both the efficiency of their work and the safety of all of us."


Along with providing a convenient blanket for cover-ups and the avoidance of full accountability for unwarranted police actions.


Posted by melvin peebles
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Apr 2, 2021 at 10:52 am

melvin peebles is a registered user.

Never trust the police.


Posted by Barron Parker Too
a resident of Barron Park
on Apr 2, 2021 at 11:08 am

Barron Parker Too is a registered user.

This is so much nonsense. Each actor here is playing a game.

The "social justice" activists live to convince people that racism
is the foundation of our society, that we are all racists, and the
police are the villains at the center of the rot. Anything that
interferes with the police is "anti-racist" and therefore necessary.

The PA Online editor and ambulance-chasing lawyers want immediate
access to accidents, where they can report on injuries or recruit
the injured.

This should not be an issue. The police understand what is necessary
to do their job, which is to protect the community from criminals.
And to protect the community, it is necessary to encrypt these
communications to prevent criminals from using internal police information.

This is not a question of "transparency," unless by "transparency"
is meant letting the criminals know what the police are doing IN REAL TIME.
The Palo Alto Police Department is entirely correct that these communications
need to be encrypted, for both the efficiency of their work and the safety of all of us.
Just as the police departments throughout the county fortunately, are doing.


Posted by pearl
a resident of another community
on Apr 2, 2021 at 12:07 pm

pearl is a registered user.

Once again, Barron Parker Too, thank you.


Posted by Steve McGarett
a resident of another community
on Apr 2, 2021 at 12:16 pm

Steve McGarett is a registered user.

*Once again, Barron Parker Too, thank you.

Yes. Thank you for your vigilence and continued support!

Aloha and Kojak sends his regards.


Posted by Robert St. John
a resident of Crescent Park
on Apr 2, 2021 at 2:21 pm

Robert St. John is a registered user.

<> The police understand what is necessary to do their job,

To presume ALL suspects guilty until proven innocent, shoot first and ask questions later and/or let their K-9s attack innocent people at random.

Very reassuring to the public.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Palo Alto Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Burning just one "old style" light bulb can cost $150 or more per year
By Sherry Listgarten | 12 comments | 3,081 views

Banning the public from PA City Hall
By Diana Diamond | 27 comments | 2,231 views

Pacifica’s first brewery closes its doors
By The Peninsula Foodist | 0 comments | 1,974 views

Holiday Fun in San Francisco- Take the Walking Tour for An Evening of Sparkle!
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 1,662 views

Premiere! “I Do I Don’t: How to build a better marriage” – Here, a page/weekday
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,485 views

 

Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund

For the last 30 years, the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund has given away almost $10 million to local nonprofits serving children and families. 100% of the funds go directly to local programs. It’s a great way to ensure your charitable donations are working at home.

DONATE TODAY