Town Square

Post a New Topic

Voters back bond measure for community college district while parcel tax falls short

Original post made on Mar 4, 2020

Unofficial election results show a Foothill-De Anza Community College District bond measure with sufficient votes for approval, while the campaign has acknowledged it appears unlikely a separate parcel tax will pass.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, March 3, 2020, 9:14 PM

Comments (3)

Posted by Citizen
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 4, 2020 at 2:05 pm

I hope the fact that Measure H did not pass will spur our local philanthropic community to fill in the gaps for our most vulnerable students.

All I can do is shake my head about the idiots who let that developer giveaway poison pill into state Prop 13, which would have provided much needed funding for health and safety projects in California schools and colleges. This is a democracy. People don't want California cities to be mini Hong Kongs (or mini San Francisco's -- too late for SF). Government should not be resorting to poison pills in propositions to keep enabling unhealthy overdevelopment.

February was the driest February on record.

Posted by Resident 1-Adobe Meadows
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Mar 5, 2020 at 6:54 am

You are all correct to say that this is a democracy. We need to understand how the current CA budget is being allocated to different state functions. Many actions are taking place which the population has not voted on. Personal issues between the governor and the current president appear to provoke many actions which are not representative of the total population of this state. And the current AG is busy suing other states because they have different laws from CA. We are paying more for non-citizens then citizens. We did not vote on this. If this is a democracy then we are going to act like one and require a vote on these major issues which are driving us out of federal funding due to non-compliance with federal laws.

Posted by Nvrijn
a resident of Los Altos
on Mar 6, 2020 at 1:15 pm

Prop G was supposed to be for structural repair of school facilities. Prop H was to be for (in part) helping with housing costs for faculty and homeless students.

"The bond will cover about 60% of the estimated $1.5 billion in infrastructure and capital needs at the community colleges in Los Altos Hills and Cupertino, from student and staff housing to technology and security upgrades."

When did student and staff housing become part of Prop G??

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Palo Alto Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Worried about the cost of climate change? Here is some hope.
By Sherry Listgarten | 23 comments | 3,389 views

Two Hours - 75,000 Meals – Wanna Help?
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 1,873 views


Sign-up now for 5K Run/Walk, 10k Run, Half Marathon

The 39th annual Moonlight Run and Walk is Friday evening, September 29. Join us under the light of the full Harvest Moon on a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon. Complete your race in person or virtually. Proceeds from the race go to the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund, benefiting local nonprofits that serve families and children in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties.