Town Square

Post a New Topic

County assessor's report captures past 10 years, points to return to 'normal market'

Original post made on Dec 2, 2019

Palo Alto's share of the assessment roll grew by 6.72% for 2019-2020 and makes up 7.62% of the total assessment roll.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, December 2, 2019, 1:54 PM

Comments (9)

16 people like this
Posted by ExuberSense
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Dec 2, 2019 at 6:22 pm

"We're seeing some office vacancies now. The office market is clearly showing signs of over building"

We desperately need to convert offices to housing and cap office building.

With the large companies owning now, they will make life impossible for the little guys, residents, small businesses, and startups. They are the giant industrial monoculture bulldozing everything and creating significant risks for the whole region if (when) something goes wrong. Just look at Tokyo.


6 people like this
Posted by ExuberSense
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Dec 2, 2019 at 6:23 pm

And the rust belt.


23 people like this
Posted by Don't do anything extra
a resident of Downtown North
on Dec 2, 2019 at 10:00 pm

Why should Pausd need an expensive parcel tax on top of the very generous property taxes it already receives from Palo Alto properties? Tax revenues keep going up and up and up. Pausd enrollment is going down and down and down.


Like this comment
Posted by Patrick
a resident of Menlo Park
on Dec 3, 2019 at 12:14 am

"half a trillion in property taxes" - that is the assessed value, the taxes on that are at most 2% of that? I'd imagine otherwise we'd be able to afford a teacher per student?


10 people like this
Posted by Don't do anything extra
a resident of Downtown North
on Dec 3, 2019 at 10:11 am

Property taxes have been going up at a clip greater than 5% for a number of years. 42% over the past 5 years cumulatively. Why isn't that sufficient for the schools, when inflation has been completely subdued, with 2.1% the highest rate over the last 5 years? Why do they need another $1000 on top of what we already pay? Just because they're used to getting it, and just because they want to keep their jobs, even when they're not needed, are not good reasons to tax us extra over and above the steadily rising property taxes, especially when enrollment is declining, and projected to continue to decline --- and when PAUSD already pays the highest salaries in the state for a unified school district of its size.


7 people like this
Posted by Art Liberman
a resident of Barron Park
on Dec 4, 2019 at 4:15 pm

Art Liberman is a registered user.

The new office building in the Assessor's report that says is 'owned' by Stanford is likely the four building campus in the Research Park built by Sand Hill Property.

Sand Hill is also constructing two office buildings at 3251 Hanover. The latter is the former site of a Lockheed technology complex. It had employed 300 persons; the new buildings, leased to a financial services company, are estimated to employ 1000 persons.

Sand Hill is responsible for bringing more workers to Palo Alto and worsening the job- housing imbalance. But it appears that Sand Hill is not satisfied, and determined to build even more office buildings! They own the lease on 3300 El Camino (near Hansen Way) and the frontage of the CPI site. Sand Hill's website suggests they are planning to build yet another office building there.

Palo Alto needs housing desperately and few sites are available and none are as attractive as 3300 El Camino, with its frontage on a road with public transit. Council needs to take action NOW to rezone the 3300 El Camino parcel from Research Park (RP) zoning to one on which housing can be built.

This site is exactly the type that has been the focus of SB50's proposal, which would give the State of California the authority to override local zoning codes. If Council doesn't take action, it will signal that Palo Alto is not serious about increasing housing and will give them good reason to pass legislation that will have the effect of overriding Palo Alto's zoning codes.


8 people like this
Posted by Anonymous
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Dec 4, 2019 at 5:12 pm

Additional: Sand Hill has created controversy at Palo Alto’s Edgewood Shopping Center and in Cupertino, see: Vallco Mall redevelopment plans.
I’m concerned about the power of the huge companies here: Google and facebook. The former is the largest, most powerful landowner in Silicon Valley, no? Influential in government at all levels.
Meanwhile, Stanford, with one of the very highest endowments in the world, pays virtually no property tax. WE little homeowners pay a LOT!! I don’t wan5 more assessments for the community colleges (enrollment is way down) OR the wealthy Palo Alto SchoolDistrict (PAUSD). Enough.


6 people like this
Posted by CrescentParkAnon.
a resident of Crescent Park
on Dec 5, 2019 at 11:46 am

>> Why should Pausd need an expensive parcel tax on top of the very generous property taxes it already receives from Palo Alto properties?

Great question.

What's the difference between the special assessment and property taxes? It is that the special assessment is the same for everyone if you own a little condo, or a tiny cottage and have zero students in school or ether you own a huge mansion in the hills. It is a rip-off of most Palo Altans.


Like this comment
Posted by atotic
a resident of Old Palo Alto
6 hours ago

atotic is a registered user.

> Why should Pausd need an expensive parcel tax on top of the very generous
> property taxes it already receives from Palo Alto properties?

Because "Palo Alto pays lowest effective property tax in state" thanks to
prop 13, 0.42%.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Legends Pizza Co. replaces Palo Alto Pizza Co.
By Elena Kadvany | 10 comments | 2,623 views

Premarital and Couples: 10 Tips for the Holidays
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 2,352 views

What is a "ton" of carbon dioxide anyway?
By Sherry Listgarten | 13 comments | 2,246 views

Do city officials ever consider giving taxpayers a break?
By Diana Diamond | 18 comments | 1,159 views

HIIT
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 975 views

 

Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund

For the last 26 years, the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund has given away more than $7 million to local nonprofits serving children and families. When you make a donation, every dollar is automatically doubled, and 100% of the funds go directly to local programs. It’s a great way to ensure your charitable donations are working at home.

DONATE HERE