Town Square
Palo Alto had $46M income "surplus" -- go towards $455M pension gap?
Original post made by Anon, Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Nov 19, 2019
Comments (2)
a resident of Palo Verde
on Nov 20, 2019 at 3:48 am
Could be a wash whether we bank the money with CalPERS or use it to pay off outstanding bonds or invest it on interest-bearing assets in the general market. Sort of like using your surprise Christmas bonus to pay down your mortgage or pay off your Visa card or keep it in your savings account for immediate access. Appears that we are forecasting a 2.40% yield on any positive balance while maintaining safety and liquidity. Don't know the effective return on the alternatives, but if we credited it all into future pension liability, we'd probably lose a bunch if we wanted it back out again. Delayed gratification is a hard sell when we see projects delayed past our life expectancy.
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 20, 2019 at 10:13 am
Posted by musical, a resident of Palo Verde
>> Could be a wash whether we bank the money with CalPERS or use it to pay off outstanding bonds or invest it on interest-bearing assets in the general market. Sort of like [... perfect example ...]
I understand your example perfectly, but, from a family or public financial-management point of view, psychologically, sometimes the best approach from a purely spreadsheet point of view isn't the best way for people to understand. From the public policy point of view, I think it is more understandable and credible if the "accounts" are kept separate. That is why I would like to get city salaries correctly forward-funded. It makes it easier to understand whether or not we can afford to buy that signature bicycle bridge, or, not.
e.g. Bond measures should be used for public infrastructure which has a provably long lifetime, e.g. school buildings. Using bonds for IT purchases and other classroom "equipment" is, IMHO, dumb, because that stuff is subject to constant change and updating and fads and fashions.
Salaries and benefits are the trickiest item, but, IMHO, finding a way (e.g. through CalPERS) to keep accounts current makes it easier to understand whether or not we can afford those new hires, or, a pay raise, or whatever. So, I think it is better to pay as you go, even if the spreadsheet says to pay off the bonds first (for example).
Don't miss out
on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Stay informed.
Get the day's top headlines from Palo Alto Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.
New Palo Alto sushi spot highlights late-night hours and affordable prices
By The Peninsula Foodist | 1 comment | 8,632 views
Farm Bill and the Organic Movement (part 5) Plus: Global Plant Forward Summit, April 18 – 20
By Laura Stec | 23 comments | 4,776 views
Sharing That Just Works
By Sherry Listgarten | 5 comments | 1,753 views