Town Square

Post a New Topic

Off Deadline: Stanford's expansion/land-use wars taking a cease-fire timeout?

Original post made on Nov 16, 2019

The surprise pullback on Nov. 1 of plans for major growth by Stanford University is almost certainly temporary, according to longtime observers of the university's land-use battles over the decades.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Saturday, November 16, 2019, 7:49 AM

Comments (4)

9 people like this
Posted by PA observer
a resident of Community Center
on Nov 16, 2019 at 8:46 am

Actually Stanford's decision is completely fathomable. Joe was overmatched by a task this big, and couldn't figure out how to climb down from his refusal to negotiate with Stanford.

Do we really want a supervisor who claims to have no idea what happened on the biggest job he had on his watch?


9 people like this
Posted by Anon
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Nov 16, 2019 at 10:19 am

Article:

>> The first approach is simple lobbying, which Stanford has shown its skill at repeatedly over many years, both locally and at the state level.

>> But the second approach appears to be something Stanford hasn't put a lot of effort into over the years: building community support for the university as a whole,

Unfortunately, what this says is that Stanford is not taking the time to do the real planning effort seriously: figuring out where its employees will live, and, how they will commute to Stanford, even as Facebook, Menlo Park, EPA, Google, Mountain View, etc, block out existing commuting on US-101 and the CA-84 Dumbarton Bridge. Figure out how more Stanford employees can live closer to, or on, Stanford.

The main problem that needs to be addressed is -traffic-. Stanford needs to think much harder than it has about -transportation-. Stanford will have a worsening transportation problem for decades to come, but, it thinks it has a PR problem. I would like to think Stanford management is smarter than that.


Posted by PA observer, a resident of Community Center

>> Actually Stanford's decision is completely fathomable. Joe was overmatched by a task this big, and couldn't figure out how to climb down from his refusal to negotiate with Stanford.

Joe Simitian has done a great job over the years. Did he tell you your dog was ugly or something? Skip the ad hominem and address the issue-- traffic.


15 people like this
Posted by JR
a resident of Palo Verde
on Nov 16, 2019 at 12:49 pm

"Some at Stanford tried to reduce the impact on the university by first getting the peak hour defined as just one hour. At least one department head, it was discovered, put out a memo encouraging employees to arrive and depart before or after the designated hour so their trips wouldn't count."

This is outright fraud in an attempt to rig a traffic study. Why isn't that department head in jail? Who ordered them to rig the study?

Shame on Stanford.


6 people like this
Posted by lili li
a resident of Barron Park
on Nov 17, 2019 at 7:01 am

A lot of that traffic comes from outsiders driving to the Dish so they can exercise for free on Stanford land. Maybe Stanford should close the Dish to outsiders? Would alleviate a big part of the traffic problem.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Su Hong 2.0? Former waiter reopens Chinese standby under new name in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 7 comments | 4,250 views

Living as Roommates? Not Having Much Sex?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,770 views

What gives you hope?
By Sherry Listgarten | 4 comments | 1,587 views

Do city officials ever consider giving taxpayers a break?
By Diana Diamond | 18 comments | 1,495 views

Expert witnesses are more than experts. Plus my 7 fundamental impeachment questions
By Douglas Moran | 17 comments | 1,482 views

 

Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund

For the last 26 years, the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund has given away more than $7 million to local nonprofits serving children and families. When you make a donation, every dollar is automatically doubled, and 100% of the funds go directly to local programs. It’s a great way to ensure your charitable donations are working at home.

DONATE HERE