Town Square

Post a New Topic

New school business official advises 'judicious' spending approach

Original post made on Mar 5, 2019

At a budget study session last week, Palo Alto Unified's new Chief Business Official Jim Novak provided a clear breakdown of inefficiencies that are costing the district unnecessarily and growing financial pressures that the board must prepare for.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, March 4, 2019, 2:33 PM

Comments (12)

11 people like this
Posted by Citizen
a resident of Community Center
on Mar 5, 2019 at 8:46 am

So according to this article and to PAUSD's own staffing ratios, PAUSD is overstaffed in a number of areas where it may not be needed and understaffed in others, like perhaps special education, even though more dollars have been devoted there, but academic results still seriously lag. And PAUSD refuses to cut staff and sort things out, adhering to some “policy” of only 'adding' staff after the 14th day enrollment check.

Sounds like a great employment program for PAUSD teachers! Job security! And on our dime....

Also according to the article, staff salaries and benefits represent 86% of PAUSD's budget, giving little room to grow, at the district with the highest per student spending in the state --- $20k/student/year. And with crippling state required pension costs to boot. What's the teacher's union to do...

How about try to extract money from Stanford over the Stanford GUP process? How else to find a new and reliable spigot of money going forward?


Like this comment
Posted by Mark Weiss
a resident of Downtown North
on Mar 6, 2019 at 9:21 am

Mark Weiss is a registered user.

[Post removed.]


2 people like this
Posted by Mark Weiss
a resident of Downtown North
on Mar 6, 2019 at 11:38 am

Mark Weiss is a registered user.

I wish to amend or addend to state that I have not actually met Dr. Novak and have heard some positive responses about his performance so far. But as a student of Borgsteadt, Froli, Hawkinson, Hinders, Struthers, Farrell, Mayberry, Grippo et al I am a snob about education.


1 person likes this
Posted by Wayne Martin
a resident of Professorville
on Mar 6, 2019 at 3:39 pm

> Also according to the article, staff salaries and benefits represent 86% of
> PAUSD's > budget, giving little room to grow,

Schools across the country often spend about 85% of their revenues on labor.

> the district with the highest per student spending in the state

While PAUSD is towards the top of the ladder (at about $20K per student) where CA school costs are concerned, it is not the highest.

What's scary is that simple projectionss of revenue growth at the PAUSD will see the cost-to-educate students at/about $40K in just ten years or so. This, of course, assumes that the price of real estate will double in that time frame. It's anyone's guess just how much real estate prices will grow--but with roughly half of every property tax dollar claimed by the PAUSD--there is a lot of money in the District's future which will likely result in doubling of staff salaries.




1 person likes this
Posted by Mark Weiss
a resident of Downtown North
on Mar 7, 2019 at 3:51 pm

Mark Weiss is a registered user.

Novak has a PhD from Walden, according to the PAUSD press release, from July, and reported here.


3 people like this
Posted by Mark Weiss
a resident of Downtown North
on Mar 7, 2019 at 5:32 pm

Mark Weiss is a registered user.

We should try to see how many Palo Altans we can get to, like “Dr. Novak” get a “PhD” from “Walden University”.

Here’s the link.
Web Link
I think you need a major credit card. If you are under 18, you should probably get your parents’ permission. That would be funny if, as a prank, all the kids from Terman did this. We can start a rumor that 8th graders with diploma mill PhDs do not have to do homework.


1 person likes this
Posted by Not Again
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Mar 10, 2019 at 7:27 pm

At about 1:07 of the 2/28/2019 Special Budge Study Session Web Link

The new Board member said bringing Special Education in house would save money on Non Public (NPS) schools - he is wrong.

It is an easy, but misleading, conclusion.

First, PAUSD already did it. For the past 10 years PAUSD has said it had brought services in house. It created new classes, such as Asperger social skills classes in middle school and high school. It created mental health programs. It spent more each year.

It failed.

Kids still needed NPS schools and not PAUSD. Why? Because PAUSD is the wrong environment. Disabled kids need to be in schools of 100 kids or less, not thousands. All PAUSD schools are too big to make this work.

Children are moved to NPS schools after suicide attempts, self injury, sexual abuse by teachers, extensive bullying by typical students, angry teachers who blame disabled for their disability - then they need to be moved to NPS schools. It is not because PAUSD does not have enough procedures to place them there. They are already there, and their purpose is to delay and prevent kids from getting to the right school.

All the new Board Member is saying is he wants to force kids back to the wrong schools because it will save money. It just looks that way. It ignores the fact that an NPS tuition costs less PAUSD pays for a full time aide and services for a child in the District, for example. This is not transparent because PAUSD costs are spread over many different departments and areas, while NPS schools show up as a single lump sum tuition amount.

NPS schools, and by extension the disabled children who attend them, are vulnerable children, and are an easy target.

We've been through this before. Please, don't start this cycle again.


1 person likes this
Posted by Not Again
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Mar 10, 2019 at 7:41 pm

Regarding the discussion about Palo Alto Community Childcare (PACCC) at the 2/28/2019 Special Budge Study Session Web Link :

We support PACCC, we donate to pack, we volunteer for PACCC, but the discussion was not entirely accurate. PAUSD does give PACC a subsidy is for programs and students on its PAUSD campuses, not just for a special sub category of preschool kids. PAUSD does not have a real preschool program, except for some early start and Pre-K due to early birth dates.

PAACC is a wonderful day care program. But PAUSD is a school district, not a day care, and I question if it should be subsiding a private entity, even a helpful non profit one. Day care is not the reason PAUSD exists. Day care is not something PAUSD is good at. There are many other area programs in the area that are high quality, and much cheaper than PACCC.

The PAUSD subsidy is unfair because it benefits only the few students who obtain the limited spaces in a PACCC on-campus program. My family was lucky enough to gain these spaces, but I never thought it was fair to all the other children who didn't. It is a fundamental violation of what a public school is for: open to all.

Since PAUSD can never fit all day care needed on PAUSD campuses, we need to think about putting our resources where they are more fairly distributed. If there are educational programs that are not funded, money needs to go there first, not day care subsidies benefiting a single organization.


1 person likes this
Posted by PA Parent
a resident of Barron Park
on Mar 14, 2019 at 4:29 pm

@Not Again

You are my hero!!!

This is very true all the way down to the suicide attempts! Being disabled in PAUSD is like being committed to a sanitorium and no one to help you escape. Pure torture! Crimes are being committed. The School Board said they would help but then they attacked with lawyers. I guess the list of violations was too long and they couldn't handle it face on!

Children are moved to NPS schools after suicide attempts, self injury, sexual abuse by teachers, extensive bullying by typical students, angry teachers who blame disabled for their disability - then they need to be moved to NPS schools. It is not because PAUSD does not have enough procedures to place them there. They are already there, and their purpose is to delay and prevent kids from getting to the right school.

All the new Board Member is saying is he wants to force kids back to the wrong schools because it will save money. It just looks that way. It ignores the fact that an NPS tuition costs less PAUSD pays for a full time aide and services for a child in the District, for example. This is not transparent because PAUSD costs are spread over many different departments and areas, while NPS schools show up as a single lump sum tuition amount.


5 people like this
Posted by PA Parent
a resident of Barron Park
on Mar 14, 2019 at 4:37 pm

I forgot to add, the $150,000 per case plus witness preparation, and overhead from dozens of people in IEP meetings to intimidate and waste time with words that lack action then to write a fable. At least $200,000 and growing... NPS is a bargain.

PAUSD's actions hurt children and take away what voice they have because they are humiliated when they try to speak up for themselves and ignored and forced into situations that are not safe for them. The FBI described the Florida shooter's profile as a bullied, twice exeptional student who was not provided the appropriate support for years...sound familiar....


Like this comment
Posted by Anon
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 15, 2019 at 8:09 pm

Posted by Mark Weiss, a resident of Downtown North

>> We should try to see how many Palo Altans we can get to, like “Dr. Novak” get a “PhD” from “Walden University”.

>> I think you need a major credit card.

Hey, "Dr. Novak" must be a persistent person; he certainly beat the odds. According to the Dept of Ed "College Scorecard", the for-profit Walden has a 6% graduation rate.

>> We can start a rumor that 8th graders with diploma mill PhDs do not have to do homework.

LOL. More useful than his "PhD" though is that Jim has a BA in Business Administration (accounting) and is a registered CPA. He can do arithmetic, which should be a breath of fresh air at PAUSD. Hopefully we won't have another $5.9M mistake any time soon.


Like this comment
Posted by Anon
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 15, 2019 at 8:14 pm

Apologies for following up my own post; I intended to include this "scorecard" link for Walden: Web Link


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Be the first to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

Downtown Palo Alto gets new Vietnamese eatery
By Elena Kadvany | 4 comments | 5,027 views

More Stupid Plastic Food Things
By Laura Stec | 14 comments | 2,561 views

Operation Varsity Blues
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 8 comments | 1,771 views

State Legislature on Housing: Getting the Demos out of Democracy & with it, Accountability
By Douglas Moran | 6 comments | 1,571 views

Environmentalists will soon be fighting housing advocates over what to do with the SF Bay locally
By Diana Diamond | 19 comments | 912 views

 

Short story writers wanted!

The 33rd Annual Palo Alto Weekly Short Story Contest is now accepting entries for Adult, Young Adult (15-17) and Teen (12-14) categories. Send us your short story (2,500 words or less) and entry form by March 29. First, Second and Third Place prizes awarded in each category.

Contest Details