Town Square

Post a New Topic

Fueling nuclear power

Original post made on Nov 11, 2011

The increasing demand for power by countries with robust economic growth -- such as India, China and Brazil -- also raises the specter of danger in William Perry's mind.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, November 10, 2011, 2:07 PM

Comments (5)

Like this comment
Posted by G.R.L. Cowan
a resident of another community
on Nov 11, 2011 at 7:46 am

Perry is like a government functionary in a realm that derives much of its government income from horses and stagecoaches worrying about the weapon proliferation potential of those new horseless carriages. The similarity between the pistons in their cylinders and bullets in guns is undeniable. He, his analogue, would take seriously a pseudoscholarly treatise titled "Transport/Crime: Breaking the Thermodynamic Link". Pseudo, because the idea is not so much to break the link as to persuade the innocent that it exists.

Heavy water-cooled and moderated nuclear power plants do not depend on uranium enrichment plants and have never been involved in proliferation. Light-water-cooled and moderated have a similar history of perfect innocence in proliferation, but do depend on uranium enrichment plants, so in their case, he might have a point about diseconomy of such enrichment plants on a national scale. The recent startup of the Bushehr plant in Iran was on uranium enriched, I believe, in Russia. Certainly supplied from there.

But there is no reason for any country that wants clean sustainable power not to have its own CANDU fuel fabrication plants.

Like this comment
Posted by Sharon
a resident of Midtown
on Nov 11, 2011 at 12:58 pm

Perry is not opposed to nuclear power-in fact he supports it.

He is opposed to nuclear weapons proliferation which can be achieved by re-purposing nuclear power plants.

He proposed a sane and simple solution to this problem.

"A way to address this problem is already on the international table for consideration:

a plan for a common "fuel bank" run and supervised by the International Atomic Energy Agency. From it, countries new to nuclear-power generation could buy their fuel and then return and exchange it once they have exhausted it producing electricity.

According to Perry, this idea "has been proposed by many people and particularly by the NTI,

the Nuclear Threat Initiative," a non-governmental agency chaired by Nunn.

Warren Buffet has given $50 million to the U.N. to establish the fuel bank."

With that in place Iran, for example, can safely build as many nuke power plants as it wants.

The sane thing is to declare the WHOLE MENA area a nuclear weapons free zone--and to aggressively force compliance by all MENA states.

Like this comment
Posted by nuke'em
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Nov 11, 2011 at 1:55 pm

Doesn't matter if Perry is for or against nukes. He is telling us the very real reasons why many countries are developing nuclear power plants. Are these countries going to voluntarily let (friendly or unfriendly) foreigners come in take over their nuclear assets? What do you think?

Like this comment
Posted by Anon.
a resident of Crescent Park
on Nov 11, 2011 at 9:26 pm

Do you mean Rick Perry?

Like this comment
Posted by Peter Grynch
a resident of Fairmeadow
on Nov 12, 2011 at 4:42 pm

Jimmy Carter forced Bill Clinton to sign a treaty with North Korea that enabled them to develop nuclear weapons. Barrack Obama's weak response to Iran's weapon program is encouraging Iran to go nuclear before Obama leaves office. Once Iran has nukes, the Saudi's will be forced to get nukes. Iraq and Egypt may be forced to follow.

I don't think that the fuel process is the problem.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Why contentious local politics? More examples from ADU at Council
By Douglas Moran | 49 comments | 2,033 views

Food Party! 420
By Laura Stec | 5 comments | 1,334 views

What Are Your Gifts that Must Be Shared?
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 497 views


Best Of Palo Alto ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Best Of Palo Alto" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 21st issue of the Palo Alto Weekly.