Town Square

Post a New Topic

TCE in Groundwater Has Toxicity Established by USEPA

Original post made by Bob Wenzlau, Crescent Park, on Sep 30, 2011

Palo Alto has a long-term burden that its shallow groundwater being impacted by Trichoroethene (TCE) and its degradation products. The source was in the 60s, 70s and 80s when it seeped from local industries into shallow groundwater, and then started migrating. One of the larger plumes is shown in this link below.

Web Link

What is the impact? The contaminants seep into creeks where it contacts people and critters, poses a vapor intrusion risk to occupied basements, and poses a risk to contractors digging. Basement dewatering similar to the Oregon Expressway underpass can cause movement of these plumes over time, thereby exacerbating the problem.

An important development last week occurred in the scientific and environmental community where the toxicity of TCE has been clarified by USEPA. The news is not good, but should inform the seriousness we take the issue as we manage this over the future decades. "The USEPA is classifying TCE as carcinogenic to humans by all routes of exposure, based mainly on its high risk of causing kidney cancers, but also on Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and liver cancer."

Here are some links where the coverage was originally flagged to me, with the USEPA statement as the third link:

Web Link

Blog Post: Web Link

USEPA Health Assessment: Web Link

My experience, is that the City could improve the attention to the issue and its long-term impact. The City has old maps of plume extent - and they should be current. The Fire Department did not seem to respond well when releases from a broken recovery well were called in. Public Works employees who dig and work in these zones are not informed of hazards. I tried to stimulate engagement, but broadly, this does not gather the attention it might, and would encourage the City to engage deeper, and create a stronger dialogue with the potentially responsible parties. (This is a dialogue I am not part of, but experience dictates that the discussion maybe too cozy, and as such too much comfort is accidentally enjoyed - and folks aren't protected.)

Once again, Palo Alto can actually be a the forefront. Thousands of communities are impacted, and it has been difficult for local government to find its role when this is not a problem they caused or controlled its cleanup. It is not a spend issue, but rather a value that needs more strongly to be lifted up inside the city. The sky is not falling, but we can do more to improve the longterm safe guards.

Comments (2)

Like this comment
Posted by tea party
a resident of Adobe-Meadow
on Sep 30, 2011 at 10:04 am

Too much big government. Close the EPA we don't have to worry about seeing these images.

The invisible hand of the free market will fix this. After everyone dies off or grows an extra arm, property prices go down, only poor people live here and the wealthy move to a healthier place. Problem solved.

Nature's perfect circle of life, tea party style.

Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Oct 1, 2011 at 3:10 pm

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

How many people have suffered actual harm from this TCE plume?
My aunt had a ranch in North Highlands, downstream from the famous McClellan AFB contamination. While she enjoyed city water brought in by McClellan, she continued, as did most of the residents, to irrigate with well water with no ill effects. If and when we decide to tap this shallow subsurface water is soon enough to worry about it. Treatment would be pennies a thousand gallons.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Nobu Palo Alto eyes next-door expansion
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 3,729 views

The Comp Plan EIR--Pluses and Minuses
By Steve Levy | 15 comments | 844 views

Couples: Cultivate Love, Gottman Style
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 745 views

It's contagious
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 400 views