Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Aug 20, 2010
Well,looks like we have a disgruntled member of the city's ARB weighing in on the new Stanford housing. everyone has an opinion. Of course given the track record of our ARB, I would not talk but...
Anyway, was this design up for review by the ARB? What was Mr Solnick's opinion then? Maybe Stanford knew that if they proposed anything "radical" the usual suspects would be out in force complaining. Also, considering the way the ARB nitpicks apart projects and makes ridiculous suggestions, maybe Stanford decided to avoid that headache also.
Seems to me that the when an architect cannot produce anything worthwhile himself, he sits on a review board and gets his "revenge" by tearing apart other's work.
Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 17 comments | 4,773 views
The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 1,151 views
This time we're not lying. HONEST! No, really!
By Douglas Moran | 9 comments | 750 views
Couples: When Wrong Admit It; When Right; Shut Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 612 views
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 505 views
Home & Real Estate
Send News Tips
Express / Weekend Express
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2018 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.