Town Square

Post a New Topic

Seat-belt enforcement crackdown in Palo Alto

Original post made on Aug 9, 2010

Palo Alto police are on the lookout for motorists and passengers driving without a seatbelt.
Scofflaws face extra scrutiny throughout August and September as part of a statewide "Click It or Ticket" campaign that has been ongoing during 2010.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, August 9, 2010, 9:44 AM

Comments (9)

Posted by cell phones
a resident of College Terrace
on Aug 9, 2010 at 12:52 pm

They've already got 95% compliance on seatbelts. The cops should focus on something more important, like people talking on their cell phones and driving erratically. Cell phones kill innocent people. The only person killed by seatbelts is the idiot who didn't wear it.

Posted by Paul
a resident of University South
on Aug 9, 2010 at 2:41 pm

I agree. People talking on cell phones endanger not themselves, or their passengers, but everyone else on the road. The culture has pretty much changed regarding seat belt use, virtually everyone now uses seat belts. We have a long way to go before we see similar compliance with cell phone laws: enforcement could really help this along.

Posted by Art
a resident of Crescent Park
on Aug 9, 2010 at 4:12 pm

How about spending more time on giving tickets to bicycle riders who continue to ignore red lights and stop signs particularly on University and Hamilton.

Posted by cell phones
a resident of College Terrace
on Aug 9, 2010 at 4:31 pm

Focus on the real crime. I have never heard of a bicyclist killing an innocent car driver. The reverse happens regularly (including several recent cases in Palo Alto).

Posted by Mark
a resident of University South
on Aug 10, 2010 at 12:43 am

"The only person killed by seatbelts is the idiot who didn't wear it."

Surprisingly, this isn't necessarily true. An unrestrained person in the vehicle can seriously injure or kill other people in that same car who may be restrained. (All it takes is one unrestrained person!) A 2004 Seattle study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association indicated that an unrestrained body beside, behind or in front of a restrained person increases the risk of death of the restrained person. It's therefore important that everyone in the car buckles up.

Web Link

Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Aug 10, 2010 at 5:54 am

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

Is an officer peeking into other cars paying less attention to traffic?

Posted by Donald
a resident of South of Midtown
on Aug 10, 2010 at 6:15 am

The cost to society from people who don't wear seat belts is high. If they are killed the roads are closed for hours and the police spend a long time doing investigations and reconstruction. If they are ejected but not killed they are usually injured very seriously and we all pay in increased insurance costs for the expensive emergency transport and extensive medical treatment they use. We are all in this together and those who act irresponsibly cost the rest of us money. It IS our business, not just those whose lives are directly affected.

Seat belt use in some states is only 60% - 70%, which is pathetic compared to California. Those are states where seat belt enforcement can not be done as a "primary" offense; the officer can only write up a seat belt ticket if the driver is stopped for some other primary violation.

Posted by TripleB
a resident of Barron Park
on Aug 10, 2010 at 10:22 am

Seat belts, really? How about going after the drivers that run the traffic lights after they turn red, something I witness every single day.

Posted by Donald
a resident of South of Midtown
on Aug 10, 2010 at 12:04 pm

I agree that running red lights is more serious than not wearing a seat belt, but wanted to express my disagreement with those who seem to think that seat belt use is solely a personal decision with no impact on the rest of us. I also feel that while red light running and cell phone use are more serious than not wearing a seat belt, that does not mean we should stop enforcing the law. How would you like it if your doctor decided not to give you any information on how to avoid skin cancer because he thought you were more likely to die of heart disease? We need to be concerned about all of the above, and we can't fixate on one thing exclusively.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Palo Alto Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Burning just one "old style" light bulb can cost $150 or more per year
By Sherry Listgarten | 12 comments | 3,284 views

Banning the public from PA City Hall
By Diana Diamond | 28 comments | 2,390 views

Pacifica’s first brewery closes its doors
By The Peninsula Foodist | 0 comments | 2,104 views

Holiday Fun in San Francisco- Take the Walking Tour for An Evening of Sparkle!
By Laura Stec | 8 comments | 1,946 views

Premiere! “I Do I Don’t: How to build a better marriage” – Here, a page/weekday
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,554 views


Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund

For the last 30 years, the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund has given away almost $10 million to local nonprofits serving children and families. 100% of the funds go directly to local programs. It’s a great way to ensure your charitable donations are working at home.