Town Square

Post a New Topic

Palo Alto police use Taser, dogs to subdue man

Original post made on Jun 3, 2010

Palo Alto police officers used a Taser and police dogs to subdue a man that tried to evade arrest Wednesday morning after an alleged auto burglary, a police sergeant said.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, June 3, 2010, 8:45 AM

Comments (20)

Posted by Randy S
a resident of Midtown
on Jun 3, 2010 at 10:37 am

Crazy. It would be pretty scary to have to catch a guy like that. This is one of those times that reminds us how lucky we are to have such great cops in Palo Alto. That dog deserves a nice big steak.


Posted by catndogluvr
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 3, 2010 at 10:55 am

Steak for the dog would be nice, but for a well trained police dog, the reward is getting the perp!
Retrievers love the retrieve, terriers love to dig--police dogs love the chase. They are herding dogs. Finding the drug stash is a reward for them as well if they have been trained that way.


Posted by Ventura Ave. Resident
a resident of Ventura
on Jun 3, 2010 at 12:55 pm

The story did not mention that numerous cars with their locks punched or drilled out were found on Ventura Ave and on Park Blvd. My car was one of those as were two of my neighbors. My thanks to the Palo Alto Police Dept. and most especially to the neighbor who called 911 at 3 am.


Posted by Wow
a resident of Palo Alto High School
on Jun 3, 2010 at 1:23 pm

Thanks, PAPD. [Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]

Meth is scary. I have an acquaintance who had to fight someone on meth once and even a frying pan to the head wouldn't stop him.


Posted by kin
a resident of Esther Clark Park
on Jun 3, 2010 at 3:06 pm

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Posted by Mike
a resident of Old Palo Alto
on Jun 3, 2010 at 8:12 pm

Good job PA PAPD.


Posted by bill
a resident of Barron Park
on Jun 3, 2010 at 9:53 pm

This is a good example of why police prefer to use a taser rather than a gun. A gun would probably have stopped him with less harm to the police officers, but it is messy. It can either kill or badly cripple a suspect. I admire the officers' restraint and give a warm pat on the head to the dogs.


Posted by annoyed
a resident of another community
on Jun 4, 2010 at 9:40 am

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]


Posted by Oh really
a resident of Barron Park
on Jun 4, 2010 at 10:48 am

"Bullerjahn said the charge of assaulting a police dog stemmed from Costa allegedly choking and hitting a dog on the nose as it had taken hold of his arm."

Very carefully put: "taken hold of his arm." Was that to support him as he hobbled to the police car? Be more honest: The police must have commanded the dog to bite the man, and he defended himself against being bitten, so they are charging him for assault.


Posted by Arem
a resident of College Terrace
on Jun 4, 2010 at 1:30 pm

Somebody needs to Tase oh really


Posted by Marty
a resident of Fairmeadow
on Jun 4, 2010 at 5:38 pm

Well done to the dog, and good use of a taser instead of a gun.
Well done PAPD.

I wish police would use dogs more often. They are very effective. Actually, why don't police use trained dogs more often?

If you don't want to be tasered, comply with police orders. I suppose, however, that that is too complicated an idea for criminals to grasp.


Posted by Good Job to the crook catcher!
a resident of Barron Park
on Jun 4, 2010 at 8:53 pm

I think it is utterly appalling that someone is sticking up for a man that clearly was a danger to not only himself, but numerous others. The article was written to inform the region about an outstanding member of society who called the police on a CRIMINAL who deserves jail time for all of his burglary tools, stolen license plates, running from the police, assault, etc.

My extreme gratitude goes out to the person who called the police... who essentially got this CROOK off the streets!!!


Posted by pares
a resident of Barron Park
on Jun 5, 2010 at 9:15 am

Thank you Palo Alto police! This is a reminder of the dangerous work you do, and we really appreciate it. Your dog deserves a reward too. Kudos to the person who called this in.


Posted by To oh really
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Jun 6, 2010 at 11:04 am

Police dogs often grasp the arm of the subject and hold them in place that way until officers place the subject under arrest. Depending on the dog, the subject's resistance, the subject's clothing, the subject may or may not have injuries sustained from this hold.

Cops don't command dogs to "bite" subjects. The role of the dog is to help capture and hold in place the subject, not attack the subject.


Posted by Oh Really
a resident of Barron Park
on Jun 6, 2010 at 1:50 pm

To,

"Police dogs often grasp the arm of the subject" Grasp, eh? Probably a lot like "taking hold." Be honest: The dog bit the guy at the command of the police.

" the subject may or may not have injuries sustained from this hold." In plain language: The guy is wounded because the police commanded the dog to bite him.


Posted by To oh really
a resident of East Palo Alto
on Jun 6, 2010 at 2:05 pm

You don't get it. The police may have commanded the dog to grab the guy, not bite him. The point is to hold the subject in place so that they can be arrested. I suggest you do some research on how police dogs are worked, they training they receive and what their range of duties are.


Posted by Oh Really
a resident of Barron Park
on Jun 6, 2010 at 3:42 pm

To,

What I get is the difference between propaganda and reality.

The police told the dog to grab the guy but not bite him. Hmm, that's a linguistically savvy dog.

But seriously, let me put it this way. Dogs do not have hands. If a dog "grabs you," it has to "grab" you with its mouth. This is also called biting. Let's have a little truth not spin.


Posted by Concerned Retiree
a resident of Midtown
on Jun 7, 2010 at 11:23 am

Personally, I am sorry that the police and the dog were injured. Too bad they had to use the lesser force of the taser. I applaud their restraint, but we now we will have one more criminal and meth addict whom we will have to use taxpayers' funds to try and possibly house in prison. Perhaps a ramped up use of capital punishment would help discourage such addicts/burglars and we could use funds now allocatd to "house" these individuals for education.


Posted by Oh Really
a resident of Barron Park
on Jun 7, 2010 at 12:48 pm

Concerned,

Good idea.

On top of that, I believe that the body metabolizes meth, so you could render the executed guy's flesh into dog meat for the police dogs without any fear of doing harm to the animal. They could probably also grind the bones for you to use as fertilizer when you plant new bushes at your house.


Posted by chris vega
a resident of Palo Alto Hills
on Oct 19, 2010 at 5:09 pm

i was in jail with him, as unbelievable as it might be he was one of the coolest guys in there.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Palo Alto Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Worried about the cost of climate change? Here is some hope.
By Sherry Listgarten | 19 comments | 2,981 views

Make Palo Alto prettier than just its parklets, please
By Diana Diamond | 7 comments | 1,701 views

Two Hours - 75,000 Meals – Wanna Help?
By Laura Stec | 0 comments | 1,486 views

 

Sign-up now for 5K Run/Walk, 10k Run, Half Marathon

The 39th annual Moonlight Run and Walk is Friday evening, September 29. Join us under the light of the full Harvest Moon on a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon. Complete your race in person or virtually. Proceeds from the race go to the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund, benefiting local nonprofits that serve families and children in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties.

REGISTER