Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

An ambitious proposal to replace Palo Alto Bowl with a four-story hotel and 26 new houses received tentative support from area residents and planning commissioners Wednesday night, though both parties agreed some kinks still need to be worked out.

The development, which drew mostly rave reviews from the Architectural Review Board a year ago, would be located at on El Camino Real, next to Mountain View and Los Altos city limits. It would feature 26 three-story and duplex-style condominium units, a 167-room hotel and a bike path winding along the northern edge of the site.

The Planning and Transportation Commission, much like the neighbors who spoke at Wednesday night’s meeting, agreed that the project skillfully and reasonably accommodates multiple land uses on the 3.6-acre site. The commission voted 5-1 (with Susan Fineberg absent) to approve the project, though members asked the developers to consider ways to reduce traffic around the site.

Karen Holman was the only commissioner who voted against the development, arguing that it will not fit in with the surrounding neighborhood. The project is too inward looking doesn’t do enough to interact with the public, she said.

The commission’s vote came after several neighborhood residents called for traffic measures to make the busy intersections around the site safer.

Linnea Wickstrom, president of the Monroe Park Neighborhood Association, said the 26 new houses would have a “fairly large impact” on the neighborhood. But she praised the developers for meeting with residents and revising the application to meet neighbors’ concerns.

The neighborhood’s main concern is traffic from the new hotel and houses, she said.

“I ask the Planning and Transportation Commission and staff to immediately plan for traffic-calming measures and commit to putting these measures in place in the next few months,” Wickstrom said.

The commission generally agreed with her assessment.

Vice Chairman Samir Tuma, who made the motion to approve the project, acknowledged that some traffic-mitigation measures will need to be adopted. But he said the project otherwise provides exactly what the city needs: a revenue-generating hotel that would provide a benefit to the neighborhood.

The applicant projects that the hotel would bring the city about $850,000 annually in transient-occupancy taxes.

“In my mind, this is one of those projects that is in part a byproduct of a lot of work that many people of this city have done over time,” Tuma said. “We encourage certain things through policy and planning and, lo and behold, we got what we wanted.”

The proposal represents a major reduction from the developer’s initial plans, which proposed 80 new houses. The project was scaled down to 28 homes last year.

The latest proposal eliminates two more houses and trims 11 units off the proposed hotel.

Architect Rob Zirkle of Steinberg Architects said the development team adopted a code of ethics that called for an open, collaborative process.

The project is scheduled to undergo another review by the Architectural Review Board in August. The City Council will then consider approving it in September or October.

“This is a great project being proposed,” commission Chair Daniel Garber said just before the final vote. “It’s a highly collaborative effort, which is great to see in the community and which is rarely celebrated or exercised.”

“When it does happen, thank you.”

Join the Conversation

15 Comments

  1. It is very unfortunate that Palo Alto will be losing the Palo Alto Bowl in favor of yet another hotel. Generating revenues for the city is great, except when it comes at the expense of kids having a safe place to go and have fun. What other activities still exist in the area for kids? It’s a shame that the City isn’t doing more to preserve long-time institutions like this that provide entertainment for the families that live in Palo Alto.

  2. Palo Alto is approving this project but where will the kids who live in these homes go to school? If it’s in Los Altos, the developer should have to pay into the school district. LASD is having to make huge budget cuts (unlike Palo Alto). I also will miss the Palo Alto Bowl. This is a great community asset used for birthday parties, school events, and bowling leagues. Sure it’s not pretty from the outside, but no one minds when they’re inside having a great time.

  3. Here we go again: Tear down Rickey’s, then build another hotel down the road, not to mention more houses on top of the building at Rickeys old site plus the Elks site. Tear down schools, then put up trailers, wall to wall, and cry about not enough room. Is this the Palo Alto process? I, for one, believe our quality of life has decreased, considerably. Is there any way to Save the Bowl. I was there Sunday and had to wait for a lane; it is so popular!!! This is a great resource for kids. Can we delay this in the manner of the Alma site?

  4. SHAME

    Our kids deserve to have a place to have fun. With the PA bowl gone, we are now down to Winter Lodge which closes during the summer.

    Whoever OKd this needs to have their heads examined.

  5. Apparently this has been in the works for a long time, yet we are hearing of it when it’s a done deal. One by one, the things that made Palo Alto livable for families are going by the wayside. Priced out of existance, it seems.

    More housing when our schools are bulging at the seams with the developers laughing all the way to the bank. We are well on the way to becoming a bedroom community for Silicon Valley who have to travel someplace else to gas up, do our shopping, get our vehicles serviced, entertain ourselves, eat out and visit somebody else’s auto mall.
    Pretty soon they’ll close the dump and it will be one more out of town trek added to the list of things to do elsewhere.

    I agree with the comment that the livability of our city is on the way down.

  6. “Save the Bowl” makes a great point. Palo Alto needs to reset priorities and direct our “hotel energy” back into our schools. I spent many hours at PA Bowl in its “Fiesta Lanes” era, but am not sure that losing an alley is a problem. The issue is how money and projects are prioritized in Palo Alto.

  7. Palo Alto Bowl announced they were going out of business about a year ago. It was in the papers…no one should be surprised by the closing.

  8. JerryL – this has been a public process for well over a year. Don’t cry fowl now. You had your chance to organize and be heard. Also, home builders laughing all the way to the bank? Development is very risky – the somber faces (and empty wallets) on home developers these days is a testament to that fact.

  9. It can join the white elephant at the corner of El Camino and Charleston………….mostly vacant.
    If the planners and the council try hard enough they can easily make it all look like LA or even NY.

  10. This has been publicized and in the works for MANY years. The very first meeting was at Ventura school some four years ago. Some Palo Alto residents were there stressing to the city planners that this area goes to Los Altos Schools and that impact needed to be considered. Every step of this process is publicized and public attendance and comment are welcome and encouraged. Public voice is the only way the city feels what we are thinking.
    I think a Bowl/Roller Rink should come up at the old Volvo site, Arastradero and El Camino. The property just sits there.

    The entertainment group that runs the Palo Alto Bowl are said to be looking for a new site.

    In my experience, property owners who purchase in Palo Alto and attend Los Altos schools do pay Los Altos school taxes and if one makes an expansion in this area, monies are payed by square foot via cashiers check directly to the school district.

  11. Sad indeed… We lost the movies, bookstore, bowling alleys, lodges, small mom and pop’s. And anyone want to wager that a 1br condo will start 500k for people who can’t afford it .

Leave a comment