Town Square

Post a New Topic

Disadvantage of the branch system

Original post made by Resident, Another Palo Alto neighborhood, on Oct 29, 2008

As I am about to run some errands and want to borrow 2 books to read while I know I have to wait somewhere this evening, I checked to see which branch I should visit. Big problem, one is available at Mitchell Park and one is available at Main. To get both these books today, I must make 2 trips or wait until one is moved from one branch to another. I want these books today, so it looks like I need to run to 2 places, plus I have just spent 15 minutes on line rather than walking to the right shelves to see if they are there.

I love the fact that I can look at the catalog from home, I love the fact that I can put books on hold, I love the fact that the library will email me when they are available. But, the wait is just inconvenient. If I was about to go on vacation and wanted these books to read, I would have had to have made a trip to the library a week before to ensure that I got the books I wanted. This is just another inconvenience to me.

Comments (1)

Like this comment
Posted by Library Patron
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Oct 29, 2008 at 1:00 pm

Yeah, I hate the branch system too as it stands. I wouldn't mind one mega-library and a few small reading rooms, but two LARGE branches (despite one being called "Main") and a significant Children's Library is certainly inconvenient.

However, this is a consequence of the organic growth of our fair City and I don't know what can be done about it. I'd rather have two state of the art large branches than two crappy library facilities, which is what we have now. And I'd much rather have the Main library torn down and rebuilt with a huge single structure with underground parking, etc., (like the San Mateo library, for example), but for some reason the ugly facility is considered architecturally significant.

Is it a surprise? The same thing afflicts the Edgewood center and its godawful Eichler status.

So, yes, the branch system sucks, but we have to live with what's possible and practical. No one will want to pay an exorbitant sum to buy new land to build a new monolithic library, even though that's really what's best, IMO. So let's do the next best thing, which is renovate our existing facilities and make them more usable. Our existing libraries are a JOKE.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: * Not sure?

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Fu Lam Mum shutters temporarily in Mountain View
By Elena Kadvany | 5 comments | 3,458 views

How Does Silicon Valley’s Culture Affect Your Marriage?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 918 views


Best Of Palo Alto ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Best Of Palo Alto" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 29th. Stay tuned for the results in the July 21st issue of the Palo Alto Weekly.