I found it really odd how the article on Palo Alto Daily News was written. A news story about Sgt. Michael Yore's actions 13-years-ago was heavily linked to the children theather investigation that is happening right now. And the l link was in the real first sentence of the article. How strange was that?

A link to the article: Web Link

There is a lesson for one and all in this story. The lesson in one word integrity.
How many times do we have to see and hear about this and that lie and how regular every day unconnected people are harmed by these liars.

Here is what I mean and I will offer a solution that will stop it dead in its tracks.

PROBLEM:
We citizens employe people to do our bidding in government. These people must have the highest integrity or we all lose. We lose because our neighbors and friends suffer from these employees failure. Witness this story where a man was accused of something through mistake and dishonesty.

Here is the punch line for this story:
The county's former medical examiner, the late Angelo Ozoa, sparked the colossal flub when he performed a flawed autopsy and later covered up his mistakes, according to court documents.

SOLUTION:
1) Terminate the government employee with sanction that they are never employed in the public sector in any capacity or as a consultant, expert witness to a public agency nothing.

2) The complete loss of pension, medical and retirement benefits again nothing not one penny from a public agency.

Now you may think this is harsh; and the responses is, yes it is and it needs to be to keep the liars out of government.

Voice of a Citizen

Voice of a Citizen: I would think that the Government Employee's Union would have something to say about your so called solutions. Won't ever happen.

To voice of a citizen- you have never lied? No one in your family has ever lied? How about you start the termination process with your friends and family.

Palo Alto has a long history of breeding corrupt cops:

Web Link

Unless we do indeed have someone with the same name contributing to this Forum, I would like to point out that the Albert Hopkins we know in Palo Alto died from a heart attack while playing basketball and could not possibly be getting involved in this.

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]

This article went almost all around this fair City..from the Police Dept., landing and bouncing around to the Fire Dept.

Would just like to add that my father was a firefighter in Palo Alto and was one of the most honest persons that I had ever met in my life. He had values. Lots. Straight and narrow. No faultering. I did hear him verbalize ~ only a few times on petty things upper officers would do, but nothing that would have ever endanger citizens or cause undo disgrace to the dept. That was the late 40's, 1950's.
What has happened to the kids who were raised with values from this generation? Where did they all go???????????????????? Not all "tuned in, turned on and dropped out" for awhile..only to return with demented outlooks and values.................

By the way, I heard that it was because of the winds in So. Cal that the airplanes were not dispersed out...........old news now.

I also have heard the phrase, "too many Chiefs and not enough Indians."

I also agree that better screening should be done for those in the Police and Fire Public Service sector. Not just the "who knows who" one~ who gets the job with the fat pocket book because he knows "joe smoe" or whomever. Do the background checking a little better. The City has enough money for a simple investment curriculum to cover a small probe. Even if we have to have M. Yore do it.

Lynn should be apologizing to the Galbraith family and the community, not scolding the media who are simply doing their jobs. Shoddy work by her detective and the former medical examiner lead to an innocent man in his 80s being arrested and jailed in the death of his wife. That's not an opinion, that's what two courts have ruled. Mr. Galbraith died with this cloud over his head, never knowing that one day after his death he would be exonerated. The county, after dragging its feet for years, has written a letter apologizing to his family and they've paid them $400,000, which probably won't cover his legal fees. Lynn and the Palo Alto City Council needs to apologize too. It's called taking responsibility. Blaming the Daily is a diversionary tactic. She should be ashamed!

P.S. -- This isn't the first case the PAPD has blown while Lynn has been chief. I remember a well-liked preschool teacher who was wrongfully accused of molestation by Lynn and her officers. His life was turned upside down and his reputation was destroyed. He spent three weeks in jail until the D.A. ran some tests and determined he was innocent. I support law enforcement in general, but when serious mistakes are made, the chief should be held to account.

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]

When comments are exerpted from a document, the comments may cast a different light on the subject from that of the entire document. This happens quite often in newspaper articles that must fit into a given space.

Whether to write a well-balanced news article or one that leans heavily on partial truths and implications is an easy choice. A newspaper must have readers; so report in a way that is more sensational or inflammatory and stir up controversy.

Before rushing to judgment on Chief Johnson's response, I would hope that you read the trial testimony. Having done so you could have a more reasoned background from which to comment.

Becky Trout wrote:
> Palo Alto Police Chief Lynne Johnson issued a rare formal response to a newspaper article

There's a good reason that a formal response from a police chief to a newspaper article is rare in our society: it looks too much like an intimidating threat to press freedom. This instance is particularly disturbing because the response did not counter with any concrete examples to back up the allegations against the article. The message is simply: "This article appears to be out to get the Palo Alto Police Department". And we all know how dangerous police can be when they feel threatened, or "fear for their life"...

When PAPD falsely arrested a teacher for sexual assault of a preschooler, it confidently asserted: "The problem with pedophiles is that they don't stop at just one". The same can be said for PAPD false arrests. Along with the teacher, there was the Gunn graduate coerced into "confessing" a crime he didn't commit. And now this case of a husband falsely arrested for murdering his wife when she committed suicide. PAPD - and the city - continue to refuse to take responsibility for any of these injustices. Yet there's even more to this legacy of denial - check out "Policing Press Freedom in Palo Alto" at Web Link

If a citizen handcuffed young females and then molested them under color of law, clubbed a citizen for merely sitting in his car or threatened to call a gang member to shoot you in order to force a confession can you imagine the consequences?

I guess in Palo Alto if you are innocent it is just that much more of a challenge!