Post a New Topic
Original post made
by Mike, College Terrace,
on Mar 31, 2008
Congestion pricing would be just one more reason for me to stay away. I see little reason, now, to mass workers in one location. If your product is information you can work anywhere.
Just thought I'd weigh in -- congestion pricing, or variable-priced toll lanes, is being seriously considered for the Bay Area. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission is the agency in charge. Councilwoman Yoriko Kishimoto is PA's rep on this.
a terrible idea, another socialist means of raising taxes. i am in favor of private toll roads or lanes in some areas, but keep the government out of that business
They don't charge you to rid elevators whose only function is to make that building tenable. Transit is to make high rise work, so let high rise pay for it.
I am a railfan from way back, but get real.
The only place I could see it work on the Peninsula, apart from freeways, would be places like University Ave, Castro Street or other downtown type streets, possibly El Camino. The reason, I would then easily avoid them and those that feel they must drive them to park outside their favorite store(?) could pay for the privilege and the rest of us would be safer while we walked there.
At some stage in the future all cars will be wearing "fast track" just to drive down the street - I see the future and it is here!!!
This is simply another way to fleece and torture people who must navigate jammed roads get to an 8:00 AM job.
Anything that will help to get business to move from Palo Alto and help us return to the nice pastoral ways of the past should be tried! and Retried until most of the people are out of our face.
Paying bridge tolls has been traditional in the Bay Area for over 70 years. Electronic toll collection, the FasTrak system, now makes it easy and efficient to include designated freeway lanes and city streets as toll roads during commute hours. When toll money goes directly to maintain the roads and bridges in the toll program, I am all for it.
Just a 3% change in vehicle count makes the difference between bumper-to-bumper traffic and free-flowing traffic.
During commute hours, freeway diamond lanes should be available for use by toll-paying single passenger vehicles and free for vehicles with 2 passengers or more.
In Palo Alto, the streets designated as traffic arteries seem the most logical to include in congestion pricing toll programs; same deal, free for vehicles with 2 passengers or more; otherwise, toll.
With wireless electronic sensors, fiber optics, and sophisticated data base software, a fair and flexible toll system should be easy and cost-effective to design, install, and maintain.
Let's do it.
This is not a matter of punishing those who must drive. It is a matter of making people pay for the costs they impose on society. We have subsidized car drivers for far too long and abosrbed their costs into general funds. When I buy a tire for my bicycle the sales tax is used to build freeways that prohibit bikes. When a car driver's pollution causes lung disease we all pay for higher medical insurance. When car drivers crash into each other we all pay for the police and paramedics who deal with the afermath. We need to stop subsidizing single occupant vehicles and make them pay their fair share. The funds raised can help mitigate the negative consequences of automobile use.
Coffeebar opens in Menlo Park
By Elena Kadvany | 2 comments | 5,067 views
Couples: So You Married Mom or Dad . . .
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 756 views
Spring College Fairs
By John Raftrey and Lori McCormick | 0 comments | 741 views
The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 0 comments | 111 views
Home & Real Estate
Send News Tips
Express / Weekend Express
Circulation & Delivery
Mountain View Voice
© 2018 Palo Alto Online
All rights reserved.