Town Square

Post a New Topic

War for oil promoters read this.

Original post made by funny stuff, College Terrace, on Apr 6, 2007

In an article written by a left wing media station (CNN) they say America will not get big contracts. This say the oil will go to other nations. I am wonder how you "war for oil" mongers will respong to this.

Web Link

Comments (9)

Like this comment
Posted by Former Oil Worker
a resident of another community
on Apr 6, 2007 at 10:14 pm

Your interpretation of the article isn't correct. These first contracts have some special risk. The Asian Oil companies are willing to assume more risk, have some special expertise, and carry less baggage. But contracts for 60-70,000 barrels from a country capable of producing 3,000,000 barrels per days doesn't mean very much.

The article ends:
"Giving out a few crumbs to the Chinese and Indians is one thing," said Kretzmann, who noted the draft law was seen by both the Bush administration and the International Monetary Fund before it was given to Iraq's parliament. "But the real prize are the contracts that award long-term rights. I think the [Western oil companies] are biding their time."

Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Apr 7, 2007 at 6:37 am

I have a hard time understanding the argument against a prefered position for the US in the oil market. Are we required to abstain from buying oil that we have saved for the free world?
Since the direct costs of production of oil is just a small part of the price, and since we are not coercing a decision, the complaints seem to be that the US is acting in the interest of the US. For shame!

Like this comment
Posted by Former Oil Worker
a resident of another community
on Apr 7, 2007 at 8:41 am


I wasn't part of the original discussion so I'm not sure what you are talking about. Oil is fungible. If Iraq ever produces substantial oil, whatever entity is willing to pay the most will buy their oil. Transportation costs are real so Iraqi oil may not end up in the U.S. but some other oil will.

There are only a few multinational oil companies who can successful exploit the reservoirs in Iraq. In the end, those companies will get the contracts (or some subset of those companies). I don't think that's the objection to the law. It is the distribution of profits from the oil which is the perceived problem.

While a company may wish to extract the maximum profit from their investments and this may indeed be possible while our troops are protecting these fields, the trend has been toward nationalization of assets. If the majors are perceived by the Iraqis as unfairly exploiting these oil fields, anti-western sentiment and nationalization will result. It's in the U.S.and the rest of the world to have a stable, long-term supply of oil. For this, the details of this law are important.

Like this comment
Posted by Phil Lanthrop
a resident of Community Center
on Apr 7, 2007 at 12:22 pm

Wally, i knew i'd find ya here...this is your cup of tea...
big business get you goin....i can tell....start to think that you
got an agendam, old sport.....sounds like your workin' for uncle sammy...
or his daddy's any's the deal
(watch the pigs squeal)...they get 1/4 of their oil.....and
george and co......take the rest.....class dissmissed....
now....i'm sure that seems perfectly fair to you....and if it
don' god you will make it sound like it know
how to rationalize like the best of em....

Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Apr 7, 2007 at 1:12 pm

My holdings have already been discussed.
We have had ample demonstration of the alternative to big business investment, government investment. Guess which one delivers more goodies to the population?
Take? as in take without paying for it?
I do want the United States to get the better of any deal it is involved with because, unlike most of you, I live in this world, not the abstract academic world where all cultures are equally relevant.

Like this comment
Posted by Former Oil Worker
a resident of another community
on Apr 7, 2007 at 1:13 pm

I've worked with major oil companies and they are true multinational companies. They aren't really "American" companies. Oil companies churn their employees at a fast rate, much faster than HP or any local company. It's either "Up or Out" and hire the lowest cost worker. That's one of the problems because the majors lack long-term perspective. They should be looking for the maximum total return rather than the maximum immediate return on their investments. But given the current political environment, it's hard for the majors or anyone else to plan for the long-term.

Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Apr 8, 2007 at 6:26 pm

We have empowered OPEC by our absolute refusal to make use of our own petroleum reserves. I would not be surprised to learn that a great deal of the anti-oil hype from greenies is either knowingly or unknowingly helped by OPEC money. You don't think anyone really cares about elk, do you?

Like this comment
Posted by Albert
a resident of Duveneck/St. Francis
on Apr 8, 2007 at 6:42 pm

10 more US troops were killed today so we can take 75 percent of the oil that doesn't belong to us. There isn't even one Iraqi who believes that the current Iraqi government is anything but a puppet government that does whatever its American masters tell it to do, and that includes giving away the majority of Iraq's oil. While we have already conceded everything outside of Baghdad, and don't have the troops or money to do anything about it, we are losing Baghdad as well, since outside of one area of the capital, we are getting our behinds kicked. At some point, once the Sh'ite miitias spring back in action, we'lll probably end up getting evicted from the green zone as well, with our dreams of cheap iraqi oil.

Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Apr 8, 2007 at 9:57 pm

Albert, your use of the term take is so egregiously wrong as to raise question as to your real meaning.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Burger chain Shake Shack to open in Palo Alto
By Elena Kadvany | 16 comments | 4,159 views

The Cost of Service
By Aldis Petriceks | 1 comment | 954 views

Couples: When Wrong Admit It; When Right; Shut Up
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 383 views

One-on-one time
By Cheryl Bac | 0 comments | 375 views

This time we're not lying. HONEST! No, really!
By Douglas Moran | 3 comments | 359 views