Palo Alto looks to renew, change Cubberley lease | May 17, 2013 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

News - May 17, 2013

Palo Alto looks to renew, change Cubberley lease

City Council set to begin negotiations with school district on new agreement for 35-acre campus

by Gennady Sheyner

The future of Cubberley Community Center may still be in flux, but Palo Alto officials sent a strong signal on Monday night that they would like to maintain the city's investment in the eclectic but dilapidated complex on the south side of the city.

This story contains 654 words.

Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.

If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.

Log in     Subscribe

Staff Writer Gennady Sheyner can be emailed at


Like this comment
Posted by Wayne Martin
a resident of Fairmeadow
on May 14, 2013 at 9:33 am

One change I would like to see is the City’s managing the finances of the Cubberley Center in a completely transparent fashion, and on a P&L (Profit & Loss) basis.

Currently, the finances of the Center are buried in the budget, or have to be requested via Public Information Requests. The City should change course and provide the residents, and the PAU ratepayers, a fully disclosed picture of the Center’s finances.

Like this comment
Posted by Dean
a resident of Midtown
on May 14, 2013 at 11:35 am

With all the personalities on CC, I wonder if any actually attended Cubberley as many of us did. Some us us, Palo Alto ex-pats, wonder how deep are the roots of the current crop of city officials.

Can anyone inform me if any have bee around long enough (pre 1978) to have attended Cubberley?

Like this comment
Posted by just rename us Casas Altas
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on May 14, 2013 at 12:54 pm

I know, let's rezone Cubberly to make it a high density development! We could put baby seals or low-income seniors there, no one could argue with that! And as we know from other projects, seniors don't eat, go anywhere, or need any services! Four, five stories high! HUNDREDS of units!! Congestion to eliminate congestion! Who cares about quality of life? We'd never have to worry about satisfying ABAG again!

And as we all know, satisfying ABAG is the City's only priority.

(Note: I was joking in the first paragraph above.)

Like this comment
Posted by Ree
a resident of Barron Park
on May 14, 2013 at 1:55 pm

For those of us who go there to use the Gyms (Cardiac Therapy Foundation or Foothill's Rehab Center, or other classes, I am wondering who is responsible for maintaining the safety of the property? The bathrooms are a mess, the water fountains are in such terrible disrepair that the "Health Department" should be taking a look at them. Is the problem, one of "it's not my part of the ownership that takes care of maintaining the buildings, etc.?

Like this comment
Posted by Crescent Park Dad
a resident of Crescent Park
on May 15, 2013 at 11:39 am

If joint use of the property is pursued, it will be interesting to know how that will work. Many of those who use Cubberly right now may not recognize that all PAUSD schools place a premium on security during the school day. In other words, school property (including fields, gyms, pools, etc.) is off-limits to non-students/staff.

Unless they set up a compartmentalized campus/comm-center, it seems doubtful that PAUSD will want to share the property during the school day.

Like this comment
Posted by Progressive?
a resident of another community
on May 18, 2013 at 2:02 pm

The innovative City of Palo Alto now has more union employee grievances than any other city in the Bay area! To be proud!

Many Managers have taken to harassing employees, "encouraging retirement", and blatant nepotism of hiring their children as "volunteers" and then training them on the job site for the next opening.

Managers are also not hiring for professional expertise, they are promoting their peers, for themselves for their pay and retirement advances from within in fear of "hiring people who know more than we do".

Several managers have taken to harassment and manufacturing lies about employees, so they can contract out positions. It is easier to show position cuts - than it is explaining millions on projects gone wrong.

Double dippers (retirees) are legally returning to 960 hour work if they retired before January 1, 2013. Palo Alto lists 50+ of these employees.

In the City of Palo Alto the "News Media" has taken advantage of the national war on civic employees by publishing news releases from management.

Employee working conditions, and pay cuts are NOT portrayed or investigated in the news media. Four years now of bashing employees wage and benefits...? There is no "furlough" just pay cuts so you work same hours, for far less pay AND continue to be bashed in the media

The next time there is a major weather crisis - wait to see what electric lineman status and SCADA employee staffing looks like.