This means that only Bob has the clear legal right to evict Joe. Bob can start with a written 30-day notice of termination to Joe or a 3-Day Notice to Pay Rent or Quit. However, if Joe doesn't voluntarily leave or pay rent after receiving these notices, it is unlikely that Bob will undertake the cost of retaining an attorney to obtain a court-ordered eviction, known as an unlawful detainer.
Your legal standing as the true landlord, to proceed against Joe, is unclear since there was never a rental agreement between you and Joe. If Bob, the prime tenant, can't secure the removal of the sub-tenant, you will be forced to terminate the tenancy of everyone in the unit in order to include Joe. However, this means you may lose Bob as well as Joe.
The problems described here are the reason we advise landlords to guard against allowing sub-tenancies. To be safe, a landlord should use a rental agreement that requires any non-family member adult living in a rental unit to obtain the written permission of the landlord. All such adults should be required to become signatories to the rental agreement, so there is a direct landlord-tenant relationship between that adult and the landlord. This approach allows the landlord to screen an unrelated adult to make sure he or she is a suitable tenant.
This approach also gives the landlord the clear right to directly evict that specific tenant, if necessary.
Q With identify theft being such a hot topic, how can tenants protect themselves from landlords who may allow applications and credit reports to fall into the wrong hands? Is there a law that would apply to this situation?
A The Federal Trade Commission has issued rules that apply to this subject. The rule is known as the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act (or FACT Act) and applies to all businesses including one-person landlords. The FACT Act requires landlords to dispose of credit reports and any information taken from them once they are no longer needed.
Small property landlords should destroy old records using a common shredder. Multi-property landlords or management companies that have large amounts of documentation may want to use a shredding service. Landlords should take great care to minimize the chance that someone will use the information for illegal purposes. Access to this information should be controlled on a "need-to-know" basis.
Discuss this matter with your landlord or management company to determine how they handle personal and confidential information.
This story contains 566 words.
Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.
If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.