Letters to the editor | January 14, 2022 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

Spectrum - January 14, 2022

Letters to the editor

Clarification on Castilleja project

Editor,

In a Letter to the Editor on Dec. 17, Rita Vrhel claimed that according to a parking study prepared by Fehr & Peers for the Castilleja School, an underground parking garage of any size is unnecessary. First, I would like to thank Ms. Vrhel for finding a typographical error in the Fehr & Peers report. Alternative 4 should accurately be referred to as the Disbursed Circulation/Reduced Garage Alternative, not the no garage alternative. Alternative 4, with a reduced garage, would meet the City's requirement to provide 104 on-site parking spaces.

The analysis provided in Fehr & Peers' report was focused not on whether a garage was appropriate, but on whether a reduction in the number of parking spaces was appropriate. The word garage appears only three times in the report — twice in the title of Alternative 4 and once to explain the reason for the parking analysis: "To further protect trees and reduce the garage footprint of the project, the City Council asked staff and the Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC) to consider allowing a reduction of required parking based on the school's transportation demand management (TDM) program."

The Fehr & Peers report is an analysis of parking demand generated by different levels of student enrollment and whether Castilleja School's robust TDM program could, pursuant to a provision in the Municipal Code, reduce the required number of on-site parking below 104 spaces. The analysis considered a 9% and a 20% reduction in the on-site parking supply. Fehr & Peers made no representations about an underground garage, but instead provided an objective analysis of parking demand to respond to City decision makers' requests for information.

Robert Eckols, Principal, Fehr & Peers

Santa Clara Street, San Jose

Comments

There are no comments yet for this post

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Palo Alto Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.