Letters to the editor | May 21, 2021 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

Spectrum - May 21, 2021

Letters to the editor

Overpriced museum tickets

Editor,

A first impression is hard to change, and the new Palo Alto Junior Museum and Zoo will be misbranded if the proposed ticket price becomes the real one. Is the museum unfriendly to families like a private, for-profit museum? Exclusive? Well-designed but overpriced? A price of $18 per person will define it in these ways, however, the museum strives to make a different impression.

Why not follow the advice of the people who raised the money for the new museum? They

recommend a much lower ticket price.

Why not remember that the museum is a civic amenity, like the park in which it is located?

The city council should set the price low, reinstall the donation box from the old free-admission days and have faith that gratitude will do the rest.

JoAn Chace

Cowper Street, Palo Alto

American dream somewhere else

Editor,

Last month, the city council avoided one of its worst nightmares: accidentally doing something to facilitate affordable housing development. Following an effort by a developer to build apartments in an area with some single-family houses, the city council swooped in to make clear that affordable housing should be illegal in single-family neighborhoods across the city.

Here's the good news: Palo Alto has a plan for affordable housing. It doesn't require the city to spend a dime incentivizing construction for the teachers, service workers and lower-income families who'd benefit from affordable housing. No bureaucracy or long planning meetings are required to jumpstart this program, which long has been in use in Palo Alto. It's tried and true.

Here's the plan: if you can't afford a home here, live somewhere else! It's easy. You may work here, have family here, want to send your kids to school here or enjoy all that Palo Alto has to offer -- and the city council hears you. They really do. They know that Palo Alto is a bastion of opportunity and natural beauty. And here's their advice: Scram!

That may seem unfair to you. But here's what you have to remember: finders keepers, losers weepers. They were here first! You can't seriously expect them to want a low-income person to be able to work hard, send their kids to a good school here, watch them go off and get an education and build wealth for their family. Of course, they believe in the American Dream -- just not here.

Kudos to the city council for finding this creative affordable housing solution. I'm sure state housing law will have nothing to say about our failure to build affordable housing here. And if it does, we'll just pursue our time-honored tradition of ignoring that too!

Josh Kirmsse

Leland Avenue, Palo Alto

Comments

There are no comments yet for this post

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Palo Alto Online sent to your inbox.

 

Meet the Winners

To show appreciation for the local business community, readers voted for their favorite places to eat, shop, work out or spend time with family and friends. The Palo Alto Weekly is proud to unveil this year's Best Of recipients and Hall of Fame honorees.

View Winners