Could Summer Streets continue through fall, winter? | August 7, 2020 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

News - August 7, 2020

Could Summer Streets continue through fall, winter?

To help businesses and satisfy patrons, City Council considers tweaking, prolonging popular program

by Gennady Sheyner

Buoyed by rave reviews of the city's new outdoor dining scene, Palo Alto leaders are considering keeping California and University avenues closed to traffic until the end of the year and adding a car-free zone on Ramona Street.

The City Council on Monday is expected to vote on a proposal to extend what is known as the Summer Streets program and to make numerous adjustments, including the addition of a new downtown block to the list of closed streets and continuation of the city's new parklet program until September 2021.

If the council approves the staff's recommendations, Summer Streets will effectively become the new normal in Palo Alto at a time when downtown offices and business parks remain deserted and local restaurants and retailers are starving for customers.

A new report from the Planning and Development Services Department underscored the business community's economic prospects, which it said "remain dim." The report notes that Stanford Research Park employees have traditionally made up a "significant portion of the customers for local retailers, restaurants and service providers." These days, only about 10% of the park's 29,000 employees are on-site, according to Jamie Jarvis, who manages the park's transportation-demand-management program.

"With global travel still limited and Stanford classes not in session, the customer base is further diminished," the report states.

Revenues are plunging. According to a city survey, local retailers and restaurants are currently bringing in 25% to 60% of their pre-pandemic revenues, with the median at 32%.

The Summer Streets program, which made its debut in June on California Avenue before being launched on University Avenue in July, has provided a rare glint of good news. City leaders reported this week that they are seeing more foot traffic in the two areas. Most restaurants, particularly on California Avenue, strongly support keeping the street closed.

Residents are also raving about the new dining scene. In response to the city's survey, 95% reported that their households felt "comfortable and safe" dining at the two commercial strips, while 5% said they did not. Furthermore, 94% said they will continue to dine on University or California avenues and 77% said they would like to see the program extended beyond this summer.

The staff recommendation would do exactly that. It also would tweak some of the boundaries of downtown's outdoor dining district. The plan calls for reopening the block of University between High and Emerson streets, on the west end of the commercial strip, to cars. While side streets currently remain open, the plan would close the vibrant portion of Ramona Street, between Hamilton Avenue and the restaurant Nola, to vehicles.

On Tuesday, the city hosted a virtual meeting to check in with residents on the program. Several residents lauded the evolving program for both livening up streets and assisting local businesses during the economic crisis. Just as significantly, not a single merchant or resident spoke out against the closures.

Downtown resident Sandra Slater encouraged the council to add public art to make the streets even more attractive to diners.

"I like to think of it as opening, not closing," Slater said of the recent changes on University Avenue.

Nicole Zoeller Boelens, who lives close to the California Avenue district, said the program has allowed her and her family to safely patronize establishments that they had grown to love. The dining district has become a stopping point on the family's bike rides, she said.

"We are there probably three or four times a week, enjoying a coffee and feeling like life is just a little bit more normal again," Boelens said.

Not everyone, however, is thrilled about the program. While California Avenue restaurants overwhelmingly favor the street closures, the reaction is more mixed among downtown establishments. Businesses on side streets have complained that the street closures are giving restaurants on University an unfair advantage.

Nancy Coupel, owner of Coupa Café, which has two downtown locations, wrote to the council that closing University to cars "will not bring benefit to the lateral streets downtown and may in fact become a deterrent for consumers due to the closure of the principal street, which joins (U.S. Highway) 101 to Stanford University."

The new report from the planning department suggests that other businesses on side streets share that view.

"They suggest opening the street (University Avenue) to traffic, while allowing restaurants to create parklets, is a fairer solution," the report states. "Not all restaurants on side streets feel this way. In fact, some are working together to propose a closure of an additional street to pilot the impact a closure of an additional block may have."

The partial closure of the Ramona block is just one example of the city's — and the restaurant community's — improvisational approach to Summer Streets. Since the program took effect, 27 restaurants (11 on California Avenue and 16 on University Avenue) have applied for permits to set up tables on the street. Two University Avenue restaurants, Rooh and Local Union 271, also installed parklets. Rose and Crown, an Emerson Street institution known for English soccer, pub fare and a generous draft menu, is using a portion of a public parking lot to facilitate dining, with the city's permission.

The parklet boom also is expected to continue in the coming weeks. Police Lt. Kara Apple, who has been coordinating the program for the City Manager's Office, said six parklets have already been constructed and are in use. The city has received 22 applications for parklets, she said.

Among the recommendations that the council will consider is extending the parklet program to Labor Day of 2021, thus giving participating restaurants more of a chance to get their money's worth on the roughly $10,000 investment that a parklet requires.

To date, there have been no signs that either the parklets or the use of public lots by private establishments are harming the availability of parking downtown. Transportation staff is reporting that the downtown garages have ample free parking for patrons. And in the city's survey, an overwhelming majority of responders described their parking experience as "great," a proportion that would have been unthinkable during pre-COVID-19 times.

Philip Kamhi, the city's chief transportation official, said the Summer Streets program took over 54 parking spaces on California Avenue and 126 in downtown. At the same time, the city is no longer enforcing time restrictions in garages, parking lots and Residential Preferential Parking districts. Kamhi said the city has opened up 879 garage and lot spaces in the California Avenue area and 3,085 in downtown.

"There should be ample parking," Kamhi said during the Tuesday update. "We still have not seen any of the garages or lots return to anywhere near full capacity."

TALK ABOUT IT

How should the city alter the Summer Streets program, if it continues? Share your ideas with fellow residents on Town Square, the community discussion forum, at PaloAltoOnline.com/square.

Staff Writer Gennady Sheyner can be emailed at [email protected]

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by sallyfwood
a resident of Midtown
on Aug 6, 2020 at 11:08 am

sallyfwood is a registered user.

Please consider helping Emerson also.


Like this comment
Posted by Mama
a resident of Crescent Park
on Aug 6, 2020 at 11:27 am

Mama is a registered user.

This makes it even more urgent to open Hamilton Avenue.


5 people like this
Posted by Please sign petition to extend program through end of year.
a resident of Downtown North
on Aug 6, 2020 at 11:45 am

Please sign petition to extend program through end of year. is a registered user.

Web Link


Like this comment
Posted by Jonathan Brown
a resident of Ventura
on Aug 10, 2020 at 9:31 pm

Jonathan Brown is a registered user.

How arrogant for Nancy Coupel to complain that the Summer Streets program won't bring benefits to the Coupa Cafe locations she chooses to operate downtown when for years she's illegally refused to serve residents of the Ventura Neighborhood at her 3457 El Camino Real location, pretending that it's a "restaurant supply" store when in fact it's flouting zoning by serving as a wharehouse for the downtown cafes. If Nancy is truly looking for something beneficial, she would comply with the law and open the cafe in our neighborhood. The abandoned Innospring parking lot next door would serve nicely as an outdoor seating area, as would the alley in back, and you've got near-constant foot traffic there during these days of working at home with people trying to move around while on or between calls. We might be more of a mixed crowd here than downtown, but we don't bite!


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.


Get the most important local news stories sent straight to your inbox daily.