The second set of questions concerns the impacts of unconditional cash on health, childhood poverty, well-being, stigma, crime and other important aspects of people's lives. Researchers, for example, want to know if a guaranteed income would affect the number of burglaries and thefts criminals are committing or if it would change the recidivism rate among ex-felons. Existing welfare programs also carry with them the stigma of recipients being "scroungers," Bidadanure said. By being universal, basic income theoretically would help eliminate the stigma and perhaps reduce demonization of certain classes of people, but researchers would need to determine if those outcomes would actually come to pass.
The third group of questions revolves around whether universal basic income would be politically and economically feasible, an area of wide debate.
The Stanford Basic Income Lab, a clearinghouse for research on universal basic income, is working to answer these questions and to advise groups and municipalities that are considering policies for income programs. It has published "Basic Income In Cities: A guide to city experiments and pilot projects," a toolkit to help policymakers and cities.
The lab also offers a lecture series on basic income that is open to the public. More information is posted at basicincome.stanford.edu.
This story contains 309 words.
Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.
If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.