If approved by the council, the development in the Ventura neighborhood would become only the second significant multifamily residential project to win approval this year and the only one to consist exclusively of below-market-rate housing.
The project also is seeking a waiver from the city's requirement for ground-floor retail, as permitted under the overlay ordinance. The ground floor would include a management office, a mailroom, bike storage and a computer lab. There also would be a floor with a community room, a gym and laundry facilities, according to the application.
Though planning commissioners were somewhat skeptical about the new overlay zone earlier this year (the council created it despite the commission's objections), on Wednesday they were overwhelmingly in support of the first project to apply for it.
Commission Chair Ed Lauing characterized the Palo Alto Housing proposal as exactly the type of development the city should encourage. Commissioner Przemek Gardias lauded the nonprofit for making the economics work for a project that could accommodate individuals well below the area median income and said he hopes the project "becomes a model for further development."
Vice Chair Susan Monk noted that the project would give teachers, restaurant workers and landscapers a rare chance to live close to where they work. She also said she was heartened by the support the project has received from the wider community, as evidenced by the letters the commissioners received and the roughly dozen speakers who addressed the commission Wednesday to advocate for the project.
"I don't think we should be treating housing as a luxury, and we're far behind on our housing production as a state," Monk said. "We are seeing people living on the streets in numbers that just keep growing. We do need to do our part to address that problem."
For Palo Alto Housing, which develops affordable-housing projects and manages Palo Alto's below-market-rate program, the project would be its first built in the city since the 45-unit Treehouse development on West Charleston Road in 2011. It attempted to build 60 apartments for low-income seniors and 12 single-family homes on Maybell Avenue in 2013, but city voters by referendum overturned the council-approved zone change that would have allowed it.
Though most speakers on Wednesday supported the project, residents of the Ventura neighborhood have expressed mixed feelings and have called on the council to make sure the new project doesn't create traffic and parking congestion on their roads. Todd Lewis, who owns two buildings across the street from the property, suggested that the proposed four-story building is too massive and that its 41 parking spots would be insufficient.
The building, he said, is going to be "very imposing for everyone in that area" and cause a lot of problems for the local community, he said.
Ventura resident Ken Joye was more sanguine about the proposal.
"I know fellow neighbors of mine are concerned about the impacts of parking," Joye said. "I'm confident Palo Alto Housing will work with us and make sure it's not a huge problem."
The new overlay district would apply to a site that was previously zoned "service commercial" and that historically has accommodated retail and auto services. Resident Bob Moss took issue with the zone change, which he argued would violate the city's Comprehensive Plan and El Camino Real design guidelines.
Kelsey Baines, a psychologist at Veteran Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System's Palo Alto campus, was one of more than a dozen people who urged the commission to support the zone change Wednesday night.
"We want to build more units and be creative about the ways we do that in order to get people into housing because there's a lot of people who are really suffering and struggling," Baines said.
Commissioners saw the project as one that both fulfills an urgent community need and a key council goal. With their approval at hand, the project now heads to the Architectural Review Board, which will consider the design of the building on Oct. 4. The proposal is then scheduled to go to the council for final approval later in the year.
This story contains 788 words.
Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.
If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.