Gunn High to get revised bell schedule this fall | March 31, 2017 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

News - March 31, 2017

Gunn High to get revised bell schedule this fall

Students critical of process, urge administration to address 'trust gap'

by Elena Kadvany

To provide time for new social-emotional learning curriculum and to bring Gunn High School into compliance with a requirement to provide students a minimum number of instructional minutes, the school will have a new bell schedule starting this fall, Principal Denise Herrmann announced in a message sent to staff and students Monday night.

This story contains 994 words.

Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.

If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.

Log in     Subscribe

Staff Writer Elena Kadvany can be emailed at [email protected]


Posted by retired guy who follows the schools
a resident of Barron Park
on Mar 28, 2017 at 11:16 pm

I’m really, really, really with the kids on this one.

In June 2013, when Dr. Herrmann was principal at Middleton High School in Wisconsin, she was smack in the middle of the same kind of thing.

A headline in the local paper read: “Hundreds of Students Voice Opposition to MHS Schedule Change.”

Web Link

“It’s not fair or practical for the administration to make last-minute changes that will negatively impact our academic future,” wrote the Middleton junior whose petition against the schedule change got 600 signatures.

Sometimes ya gotta wonder who needs these “social-emotional” lessons more. The kids? Or the grownups in charge?

Posted by Concerned Parent
a resident of Barron Park
on Mar 28, 2017 at 11:36 pm

[Post removed due to same poster using multiple names.]

Posted by As trust does
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 28, 2017 at 11:39 pm

I'm very uncomfortable hearing all this "evidence-based" this and "evidence-based" that. My experience with the district is that it doesn't matter how much evidence of the highest consensus level you provide, if they don't want to do something, even related to health and safety, they won't and they'll probably find a way to attack you personally to boot. And if they want to do something, they'll go out and find some expert to support what they want to do, even if what that expert said doesn't exactly cobstitute evidence. I'm not saying that's what was done here, but I totally concur with the kids about the trust problem.

I wish our trustees woukd put more emphasis on creating trustworthy administration and hiring people who actually like working with the public in good faith. Again, not meaning Herrman in particular.

Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 29, 2017 at 6:56 am

I have no particular thoughts one way or the other in the bell change.

What I do think is a useful learning lesson for the students is that it is better for them to learn a life lesson that they are a cog in a wheel of life when it comes to things that may affect them. This will be something they will learn how to deal with and when the next life change affects them when it doesn't suit them they will be able to deal with it better.

Sometimes changes happen that affect us without us having any say in the matter. It is life. Sometimes the changes are brought into effect when the people are given the choice and they make the wrong decision for the wrong reasons. There are times when the decisions are made for us by those who have the skills and knowledge to make the decision. We are just small cogs in a big wheel. It is better to learn how to make informed decisions when we have the opportunity to make a decision.

Life skill.

Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 29, 2017 at 6:58 am

(Sorry submitted too quickly)

Life skill - and sometimes those in charge make the wrong decision for the wrong reason and we still have to deal with it. Terman and Jordan, anyone?

Posted by Gunn parent
a resident of Charleston Gardens
on Mar 29, 2017 at 7:40 am

Hold firm Denise! We are with you. You are doing the right thing.

Finally, TA at Gunn. Break out the champagne!

Posted by Connie
a resident of Palo Verde
on Mar 29, 2017 at 8:06 am

I completely understand that the administration needs to bring the number of hours attended back into compliance; however, this change does take away something very important.

Currently at Gunn, the students have a Flex time (Tuesdays and mandatory) and a Tutorial time (Thursdays and not mandatory).

During Flex time, students have a choice to check in with a teacher or go to the library (I think there are other places they can check in). Since this time is mandatory, students who seek out a teacher for help, may be in a classroom with upwards of 30-40 other students making it virtually impossible for any one student to get the help they need.

During Tutorial, since this time is optional, there are far fewer students in any given class seeking help. My students, and the ones who attend tutorial, really benefit from this time. They are more able to have their questions answered and make-up tests.

The new schedule takes away Tutorial and adds an additional Flex time (both flex times will be mandatory). This will "get rid" of the smaller class size for those students needing the extra help.

I have raised this issue with administration both last year and again this year, but do not have any clear answer on what strategies are going to be put in place to alleviate that challenge.

I am uncomfortable that by making this change without addressing the overcrowding in Flex time, will negatively affect those students needing the most help.

Posted by Concerned Parent
a resident of Barron Park
on Mar 29, 2017 at 8:41 am

I believe students should have their voice in scheduling change because they are the ones affected by the schedule changes. Any SEL will emphasize on listening to the students and building trusting relations with them. Gunn Admin should have taken this as a good chance show respect and empathy for students petition, which could have made this a good SEL case. SEL can't be taught by lecturing, it showed in how we treat our students in everyday life. Unfortunately, the Admin did the opposite. The students voice was ignored, I am questioning if our education experts are telling the students one value, and they themselves often do the opposite that is contradictory to the value they promote. No matter how shiny this SEL concept is, the adults who implement it should be a good role model first.

Posted by Sanctimonious City
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 29, 2017 at 4:08 pm

With daily bell times that randomly change throughout the year, it is becoming more obvious that the schedule is being controlled by the Magic 8-Ball. The give away is the responses from the school district.

Will school end today at 3:40pm? - Outlook good
Will the time be off set differently by 15 mins next week? - Signs point to yes
Is there a way to plan ahead for pick up times? - My sources say no
Will there be a calendar published before the start of summer? - Ask again later

The new schedule is so unpopular with students that they have started a petition to Principal Hermann on As of today, there are over 550 signatures. If SEL is really about soft skills then maybe the school should practice the art of listening to the group of people who will be impacted most.

Petition Link:
Web Link

Posted by musical
a resident of Palo Verde
on Mar 29, 2017 at 4:35 pm

I always listen to the people who sign my paychecks, whether or not they care about the customer.

Posted by anonymous
a resident of Barron Park
on Mar 29, 2017 at 6:15 pm

I like the new schedule because the struggling student who is always scheduled with another teacher for Flextime 90%
of the time is not going to walk in on their own accord on a voluntary Thursday tutorial. Thus I can snatch them with the second Flex and make them do their work and raise their grade. It aligns with goals. Simple.

Posted by jimmyh
a resident of Community Center
on Mar 29, 2017 at 7:08 pm

How can the schools not even be meeting the MINIMUM number of school hours that the state requires?

I bet if they went a few hours over the minimum you'd hear it from the teacher's union.

Do the hours include the "Flex" time that many students skip?

Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Mar 29, 2017 at 8:36 pm

I am really quite shocked at the fact that we fall short of minimum hours (or minutes). We are told that 180 instructional days is what we have to have, which falls far behind many other countries. We know that other countries have a longer school day also. American and in particular Californian schools perform poorly against their peer groups around the world. It is no surprise that more hours and more days in school must at least be partly responsible for better performance elsewhere.

However, how do we calculate time spent for emergency drills (earthquake, fire, code red and code yellow), mandatory assemblies, etc. when it comes to calculating minutes and hours? What about the movies shown by substitute teachers?

No wonder we are falling behind.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Palo Alto Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.


Register today to support local nonprofits

The 38th annual Moonlight Run and Walk is Friday evening, September 9. Proceeds go to the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund, benefiting local nonprofits that serve families and children in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties. Join us under the light of the full Harvest Moon on a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon. Complete your race in person or virtually to support local nonprofits.

Register Now!