In city that loves to plan, Palo Alto's creates cynicism | July 19, 2013 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

Spectrum - July 19, 2013

In city that loves to plan, Palo Alto's creates cynicism

Awash in development proposals, city's aged planning vision takes a back-seat

Palo Alto's official and legally mandated Comprehensive Plan bills itself as "the primary tool for guiding future development of the city" that "strives to build a coherent vision of the city's future from the visions of a diverse population."

This story contains 804 words.

Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.

If you are already a member, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Membership starts at $12 per month and may be cancelled at any time.

Log in     Join


Posted by Zayda
a resident of Barron Park
on Jul 19, 2013 at 12:18 pm

Bravo for a well written editorial. I won't repost the comment I made about broken promises to the excellent accompanying article by Gennady Sheyner. It's there for all to read. I will only quote the philosopher George Santanya who said "He who does not remember history is doomed to repeat it". Think 1967. It's happened before. It can happen again.

Posted by Dan
a resident of Southgate
on Jul 19, 2013 at 12:52 pm

I'm thrilled that "Jim Keene committed to having an independent economic analysis completed for every PC application that quantified the value to the developer and the value of the proposed public benefits." I've been wondering why we don't do that. I've always had the feeling that developers were getting much more financial benefit than the City in these PC deals. I think PA should get at least as much benefit as the developer. I also think the applicant should pay for the cost of the study. When will we actually see one of these studies?

Posted by curmudgeon
a resident of Downtown North
on Jul 19, 2013 at 1:23 pm

"simply paying cash to the city was deemed a public benefit"

In other words, favorable spot zoning is for sale. Isn't there a word for for the act of paying to bypass the law?

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Palo Alto Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.


Sign-up now for 5K Run/Walk, 10k Run, Half Marathon

The 39th annual Moonlight Run and Walk is Friday evening, September 29. Join us under the light of the full Harvest Moon on a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon. Complete your race in person or virtually. Proceeds from the race go to the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund, benefiting local nonprofits that serve families and children in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties.