Guest Opinion: Even without housing, Gateway offers many benefits | April 27, 2012 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

Spectrum - April 27, 2012

Guest Opinion: Even without housing, Gateway offers many benefits

by Jim Baer

After eight public hearings with few opposing speakers, we believe the Gateway project, a transit-oriented development with Planned Community zoning proposed for 101 Lytton Ave., is nearing final approval. Both the Architectural Review Board and the Planning and Transportation Commission recommended the City Council approve an earlier version of the project with four floors of office space and a fifth floor of rental apartments, of which half were "affordable" below-market-rate units.

This story contains 448 words.

Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.

If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.

Log in     Subscribe

Jim Baer is one of the city's most active developers and real estate consultants. He is representing the three developers of the 101 Lytton project, Lund Smith, Boyd Smith Jr. and Scott Foster. Baer helped the Weekly develop its office building on Cambridge Avenue and co-owned it until construction was completed in 2009, when the Weekly bought out his interest. The Weekly has no current financial ties to Baer.


Posted by frustrated resident
a resident of University South
on May 3, 2012 at 11:18 pm

Basically, Jim Baer is saying that this is a great development because the developers are paying lots of money to Palo Alto. I don't see any benefits intrinsic to the building itself. Is Palo Alto so broke that it's reduced to auctioning off development rights - build it big and give us money? This corner should have been developed according to the comprehensive plan - that plan was carefully thought out, and now every new building flouts it. Why is my city council selling out my city?

Posted by common sense
a resident of Midtown
on May 4, 2012 at 12:36 am

Jim Baer is offering to fund several special interest groups and is calling it a "public benefit" - it's all double speak:

- How does the contribution to "affordable housing" benefit the current Palo Alto residents? - it will only overcrowd the neighborhood schools.

- How does a one time parking fee create more parking spaces? all the additional office space granted above what the current zoning allows will only make a difficult parking problem worse.

- A one time funding for a parking permit program - how will the parking permit program be funded for the following years? it won't be funded.

- Urban design benefits? how does this benefit the current Palo Alto residents?

- Funding for enivronmental leadership? caltrain passes for the people renting the offices - that's not a benefit for the Palo Alto residents, it's a benefit for the people renting the offices.

Of course Jim Baer donates to many of the city council members campaigns, and he gets his pals in the special interest groups to support those candidates; I predict that except for Holman & Schmidt, the rest of the city council members, will be falling all over themselves to thank Jim for being so generous to these special interest groups and approve all the zoning changes. Shame on them.

Posted by Watching the vote
a resident of Downtown North
on May 4, 2012 at 1:30 am

Another name for those monies is bribery. That's what it would be called if we read about it happening in another city.

I'll be watching to see which council members vote for this underparked oversized McOffice.

Posted by mmmMom
a resident of Downtown North
on May 4, 2012 at 10:52 am

"McOffice?" Ha-ha.... what a perfect description.

And "urban design?" Yeah, BAD urban design.

And P.A. does NOT need any more very low income housing - there are too many as it is, & the huge eyesore being built @ Homer & Alma is adding to it. (To say nothing of the section 8 housing that is also available.) What we need are more BMR units that the lower middle income people can actually purchase themselves. Rents are outrageous in P.A; & the middle class is being forced out. Compare the numbers of available poverty level units with those for only marginally higher incomes - it is unfair. And don't forget: that dying middle class, & lower middle class are the ones shopping in town, spending our $$ here AND PAYING TAXES to subsidize the housing we make just a wee too much to utilize. Totally absurd.

Posted by curmudgeon
a resident of Downtown North
on May 4, 2012 at 11:46 am

By spreading money to outside groups, Baer is basically buying their support for his latest moneymaker.

City policy used to be that a PC project's "benefits" had to be on the site itself. I wonder if they changed that just for Baer. He does have a way of getting his way at City Hall, maybe because he, his relatives, and his associates, give lavishly to the city council candidates who do his bidding. [Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff]

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Palo Alto Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.


Register today to support local nonprofits

The 38th annual Moonlight Run and Walk is Friday evening, September 9. Proceeds go to the Palo Alto Weekly Holiday Fund, benefiting local nonprofits that serve families and children in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties. Join us under the light of the full Harvest Moon on a 5K walk, 5K run, 10K run or half marathon. Complete your race in person or virtually to support local nonprofits.

Register Now!