Editorial: The Weekly recommends: | October 29, 2010 | Palo Alto Weekly | Palo Alto Online |

Palo Alto Weekly

Spectrum - October 29, 2010

Editorial: The Weekly recommends:

While many have already voted by mail, for those still thinking about how to vote the following suggestions may help

In recent weeks the Weekly has taken editorial positions on candidates and issues we felt were most important or of interest to Palo Alto area voters. Following is a summary of those recommendations, with references to the archived editorials.

This story contains 369 words.

Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.

If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.

Log in     Subscribe


Like this comment
Posted by 4 more days
a resident of another community
on Oct 30, 2010 at 12:02 am

Your endorsement of Boxer is too little, too late. 26 newspapers have endorsed Carly Fiorina. In San Francisco, Boxer gets no love. First, the Chronicle refused to endorse anyone for Senate, and The Examiner endorsed Fiorina!

Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Oct 30, 2010 at 8:13 am

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

Years ago in Southern California it was said that, if you didn't have time to study the issues, get a LA Times and vote opposite their recommendations. Odd that, after all these years that still works for me. As a veteran I can never forget or forgive Boxer's vendetta against the military and her roll in closing California military bases. [Yes, I know about the Base Closing Commission but I also know about senatorial privilege.]
Brown had only one good idea during his terms of office, Cal-sat, and he failed to implement that. Edmond Brown's reluctance to see justice in murder cases carried over to Jerry's appointment of Rose Bird as Chief Justice, saw killers elevated to folk hero status. His Era of Limits brought a moratorium on infrastructure from which we have never recovered.
Jerry's surface asceticism, appropriate to a seminarian, was imposed on California while Jerry never denied himself the real pleasures of the high born.
Proposition 23 is one last chance to stave off the industrial diaspora that has seen much of California's industry exiled. Like the child who realizes that an expressed disbelief in Santa will bring a net reduction in fun and games presents, the Green Warmies are reluctant to give up the power they gained at the height of the Warmie scam.

Like this comment
Posted by Greg
a resident of Southgate
on Oct 31, 2010 at 11:40 am


I think you are not seeing Prop 23 correctly. If prop 23 is defeated (and I hope it is), the cost of energy will go up so much, and so many jobs will be lost, that only nuclear power will be able to save the day.

Until California embraces nuclear power, it will continue to decline. A "no" vote on Prop 23 will force the issue.

Like this comment
Posted by Walter walter walter
a resident of Stanford
on Oct 31, 2010 at 11:49 am

[Post removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]

Like this comment
Posted by Walter_E_Wallis
a resident of Midtown
on Oct 31, 2010 at 8:59 pm

Walter_E_Wallis is a registered user.

[Portion removed by Palo Alto Online staff.]

Greg, remember how long it took to cancel the Double Nickle. The President openly said his energy plan would raise the cost of utilities but the only outrage was from those who know the critical importance to available affordable energy.

Like this comment
Posted by any member name
a resident of Midtown
on Nov 1, 2010 at 7:33 pm

As usual, the Weekly is in favor of those whose only idea of governing is to spend more and more money. That's how the state budget got in the mess it's in now.

Like this comment
Posted by food for thought
a resident of another community
on Nov 10, 2010 at 8:47 am

E-mail this topic.
Print this topic.
"The President Told the Truth" video- (About JFK) - Good stuff
Have you seen these videoes? They are a must see for anyone who wants to begin to understand what is happening in the USA today. JFK's speech may explain why the elitest decided to get rid of him. It also explains a little more about the secret government we have today.

Video: The President Who Told the Truth


The video "I Dare You to Watch This Video and Think" is an interesting video. I think the average person might learn a lot about how government really works in the world/USA from it. Check it out and see what you think.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.