THE NEW DEAL ... For the Palo Alto City Council, the Monday night meeting was both the best and worst of times for labor negotiations. The council scrapped its proposal to place the city's binding-arbitration provision on the November ballot, but grudgingly agreed to place on the ballot the firefighters' initiative to freeze staffing levels in the Fire Department ("We have to put it on the ballot — it's not a choice," Greg Scharff explained, almost apologetically). But the meeting also featured a major milestone for the city's relationship with its biggest union, the Service Employees International Union, Local 521. The two sides famously clashed last year, when contract talks broke down and the City Council imposed benefit reductions on the 600-plus workers represented by the union. The union responded by staging a one-day strike and by calling in sick en masse. On Monday, however, the council had nothing but praise and gratitude for the city's largest union. The two sides had formalized the contract changes (including a new pension formula, reduced floating holidays and increased health care contributions) and the council was formally approving its new one-year contract with SEIU. As part of the agreement, the union also withdrew its "unfair labor practice" claims against the city, said Human Resources Director Russ Carlsen, who called the new contract a "significant event for everyone." The new contract represents a reduction of about 4 percent in employee compensation and benefits, he said.
COMPOST WARS ... The phrase "feasibility study" rarely ruffles feathers in Palo Alto, where task forces and multiple public hearings are the chief problem-solving tools. But this week, the city's environmentalists renewed their heated internal debate over the future of composting in Palo Alto. The City Council was prepared to discuss awarding a contract for a feasibility study for a new anaerobic-digestion facility at Byxbee Park. The council approved the study in April by a 5-4 vote after a lengthy debate. The argument continued this week when both proponents and opponents of the proposed plants made another pitch to the council. Advocates for the new plant, including environmentalist Walt Hays and Cedric de la Beaujardier, who last year co-chaired the specially appointed Compost Task Force, both urged the council to approve the study. Project proponents are also gathering signatures for a ballot petition that would allow Byxbee Park land to be used for composting. The new study, Hays said, will give voters some basis for making an informed decision about the new facility. But project opponents, including conservationist Emily Renzel and attorney Tom Jordan, argued that Byxbee Park is no place for a new waste-to-energy facility. Jordan asked the council to reconsider the feasibility study. He also criticized the opposing camp for gathering signatures and preparing for an election before the study is completed. "It's almost as if they're afraid of the information," Jordan said. The council opted to discuss the issue and vote on the contract later in the week.
This story contains 692 words.
Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.
If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.