News

Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors looks to pitch in another $10M for all-inclusive playgrounds

But questions remain about where the funding will come from

An adult helps push children riding the net spinner at the Magical Bridge playground in Palo Alto on Jan. 19, 2020. Photo by Magali Gauthier

Looking to replicate the success of the past, Santa Clara County’s Board of Supervisors is considering setting aside $10 million to help local jurisdictions build more all-inclusive playgrounds.

The referral, which passed in a 5-0 vote at the Sept. 19 board meeting, seeks to revive the county’s All-Inclusive Playground Grant (AIPG) program.

Inspired by the Rotary PlayGround in San Jose and Magical Bridge Playground in Palo Alto, the AIPG program started as a one-time grant opportunity in 2017. The county allocated $10 million in matched funding to communities, with up to $2 million for each supervisorial district, to expand access to playgrounds for children with disabilities.

The program was so successful that the county approved a second round of funding in 2018. It's now looking to add a third round that would support all-inclusive tracks, arenas and courts too.

“There are now 24 projects that are underway, some of them actually completed and being enjoyed today,” said Supervisor Joe Simitian. “And the clear indication is that if we had one more round of these grants, at the same level, there would be takers.”

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

But while the board unanimously approved the referral, President Susan Ellenberg expressed concerns about the program’s source of funding. The county already gave out $20 million in two funding cycles. It would be difficult to justify another $10 million, she said, adding that the board likely will be having “very tough budget discussions” next month.

Simitian said that the previous iterations of the grant program had tangible and intangible benefits, and leveraged tens of millions more from cities, school districts and non-profit organizations that shared in the construction costs. As a one-time grant, it also did not have ongoing annual budget considerations, he said.

Supervisor Sylvia Arenas, who initially expressed strong support for the proposal, said that she would take Ellenberg’s budgetary worries into consideration when staff returned with a report about potential funding options for the program. She also requested that the report include an equity analysis, stating that the playgrounds needed to benefit all communities.

Speakers at the Tuesday meeting urged the board to build more playgrounds, with several supporting Arenas’ request to include an equity analysis. They also advocated for a committee, comprised of people with disabilities and their families, to help oversee the grant process to ensure the playground designs were inclusive and served their intended demographic.

“Performativity is an ongoing problem because the disability community needs are not adequately understood, and people with disabilities are still seen through a medical model,” said Michele Mashburn, a Santa Clara County resident and disability advocate, who spoke at the meeting and submitted an emailed statement. “The county must do better and start to learn more about the gaps that exist and how inadequately they have been addressed over time,” she added.

As part of its commitment to expand access to services for people with disabilities, the county recently established an Office of Disability Affairs. The initiative to create more all-inclusive playgrounds is one step towards reaching this goal, according to the board’s report.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Follow Palo Alto Online and the Palo Alto Weekly on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors looks to pitch in another $10M for all-inclusive playgrounds

But questions remain about where the funding will come from

by / Mountain View Voice

Uploaded: Thu, Sep 21, 2023, 9:42 am

Looking to replicate the success of the past, Santa Clara County’s Board of Supervisors is considering setting aside $10 million to help local jurisdictions build more all-inclusive playgrounds.

The referral, which passed in a 5-0 vote at the Sept. 19 board meeting, seeks to revive the county’s All-Inclusive Playground Grant (AIPG) program.

Inspired by the Rotary PlayGround in San Jose and Magical Bridge Playground in Palo Alto, the AIPG program started as a one-time grant opportunity in 2017. The county allocated $10 million in matched funding to communities, with up to $2 million for each supervisorial district, to expand access to playgrounds for children with disabilities.

The program was so successful that the county approved a second round of funding in 2018. It's now looking to add a third round that would support all-inclusive tracks, arenas and courts too.

“There are now 24 projects that are underway, some of them actually completed and being enjoyed today,” said Supervisor Joe Simitian. “And the clear indication is that if we had one more round of these grants, at the same level, there would be takers.”

But while the board unanimously approved the referral, President Susan Ellenberg expressed concerns about the program’s source of funding. The county already gave out $20 million in two funding cycles. It would be difficult to justify another $10 million, she said, adding that the board likely will be having “very tough budget discussions” next month.

Simitian said that the previous iterations of the grant program had tangible and intangible benefits, and leveraged tens of millions more from cities, school districts and non-profit organizations that shared in the construction costs. As a one-time grant, it also did not have ongoing annual budget considerations, he said.

Supervisor Sylvia Arenas, who initially expressed strong support for the proposal, said that she would take Ellenberg’s budgetary worries into consideration when staff returned with a report about potential funding options for the program. She also requested that the report include an equity analysis, stating that the playgrounds needed to benefit all communities.

Speakers at the Tuesday meeting urged the board to build more playgrounds, with several supporting Arenas’ request to include an equity analysis. They also advocated for a committee, comprised of people with disabilities and their families, to help oversee the grant process to ensure the playground designs were inclusive and served their intended demographic.

“Performativity is an ongoing problem because the disability community needs are not adequately understood, and people with disabilities are still seen through a medical model,” said Michele Mashburn, a Santa Clara County resident and disability advocate, who spoke at the meeting and submitted an emailed statement. “The county must do better and start to learn more about the gaps that exist and how inadequately they have been addressed over time,” she added.

As part of its commitment to expand access to services for people with disabilities, the county recently established an Office of Disability Affairs. The initiative to create more all-inclusive playgrounds is one step towards reaching this goal, according to the board’s report.

Comments

Bystander
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Sep 21, 2023 at 1:15 pm
Bystander, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
Registered user
on Sep 21, 2023 at 1:15 pm

Personally, I think we should have playgrounds designed for different age groups. I think it is very wrong to see toddlers and 10 year olds playing in the same space. In elementary schools, kindergartners have their own playgrounds because it is thought that they should be protected from stronger, older kids playing in the same space.

It would be much better to have areas in all playgrounds which are designed for under 3s, and other areas which are designed for over 8s, as well as an area for those inbetween. On the few occasions I have seen the Magic Bridge near Mitchell Park library, it has been overcrowded with too many kids and looks dangerous to me. What would happen if a 10 year old ran past a toddler and sent them flying?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.