News

Bill proposing Bay Area bridge toll increase for public transit paused

Critics argued that legislation would unfairly impact low-income residents

A state bill that would have raised funds for Bay Area transit agencies such as Caltrain through a bridge toll hike has been shelved for now. Embarcadero Media file photo by Veronica Weber.

A bill proposing a temporary toll increase for Bay Area bridges to fund public transportation has been shelved, its authoring legislators said Monday, Aug. 21.

State Sen. Scott Wiener and Assemblymember Lori Wilson, D-Suisun City, said in a joint statement that State Bill 532 has taken a pause. They will instead focus their efforts on developing strategies for more transit funding for the next legislative session.

If passed the bill would have raised tolls by $1.50 on seven Bay Area bridges for five years, starting in 2024. The estimated $180 million in revenue would have been used to sustain funding for Bay Area transit agencies as federal emergency resources dry up post-COVID-19 lockdowns.

The bill was intended to give agencies enough time to continue services until they find a stable source of funding, which could potentially come in the form of a regional ballot measure in the future.

"While there was not enough time to reach a consensus on how to solve this looming problem, we made substantial progress on a solution," Wiener said. "I will continue to make transit operations funding a major priority, and I look forward to continuing those discussions into the fall."

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

The pause comes after multiple California representatives expressed concerns about the legislation unfairly impacting low-income residents and that it would not provide sustainable solutions for public transportation agencies in the long-term.

The Palo Alto City Council discussed SB 532 at its Aug. 14 meeting. Council members considered a resolution drafted by city staff, which — while not directly opposing SB 532 — certainly threw some shade at it. SB 532 "would bypass the voters to levy a bridge toll increase on the commuters who can least afford it," it stated.

Mayor Lydia Kou, who is running for the state Assembly, launched a petition drive opposing the bill.

"I don't believe that nickel and diming people who are just trying to travel or get to work is the right way to ‘bail out' public transportation agencies," Kou's petition stated.

The full City Council opted not to take a stance on the bill, voting unanimously to simply "monitor" the bill.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Wiener and Wilson said that, in response to the opposition, they will collaborate with Bay Area legislators in a working group to determine which transit funding proposals to pursue in the next legislative session. Potential proposals include state budget allocations, temporary toll increases and the regional transit funding measure, among other ideas.

"Increasing tolls can be a significant burden to Bay Area commuters who are already dealing with high cost of living, inflation and other expenses. From an equity perspective, tolls can have substantial repercussions especially for those where public transit is not a viable option." Wilson said.

"We need to ensure there is accountability and verifiable data collection so that our proposed solutions are evidence-based and defensible to those being asked to bear the burden of this investment. I look forward to facilitating these discussions along with Senator Wiener in the Fall with interested members of the Bay Area Caucus," she added.

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency said in a statement on social media that it found the pause "very disappointing" and a "blow" to their efforts to preserve Muni service.

"But we're going to keep fighting for the hundreds of thousands of people who rely on Muni every single day," agency officials stated. "We can't afford to lose transit."

Palo Alto Online Staff Writer Gennady Sheyner contributed to this report.

Follow Palo Alto Online and the Palo Alto Weekly on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Bill proposing Bay Area bridge toll increase for public transit paused

Critics argued that legislation would unfairly impact low-income residents

by Olivia Wynkoop / Bay City News Service

Uploaded: Mon, Aug 21, 2023, 9:02 pm

A bill proposing a temporary toll increase for Bay Area bridges to fund public transportation has been shelved, its authoring legislators said Monday, Aug. 21.

State Sen. Scott Wiener and Assemblymember Lori Wilson, D-Suisun City, said in a joint statement that State Bill 532 has taken a pause. They will instead focus their efforts on developing strategies for more transit funding for the next legislative session.

If passed the bill would have raised tolls by $1.50 on seven Bay Area bridges for five years, starting in 2024. The estimated $180 million in revenue would have been used to sustain funding for Bay Area transit agencies as federal emergency resources dry up post-COVID-19 lockdowns.

The bill was intended to give agencies enough time to continue services until they find a stable source of funding, which could potentially come in the form of a regional ballot measure in the future.

"While there was not enough time to reach a consensus on how to solve this looming problem, we made substantial progress on a solution," Wiener said. "I will continue to make transit operations funding a major priority, and I look forward to continuing those discussions into the fall."

The pause comes after multiple California representatives expressed concerns about the legislation unfairly impacting low-income residents and that it would not provide sustainable solutions for public transportation agencies in the long-term.

The Palo Alto City Council discussed SB 532 at its Aug. 14 meeting. Council members considered a resolution drafted by city staff, which — while not directly opposing SB 532 — certainly threw some shade at it. SB 532 "would bypass the voters to levy a bridge toll increase on the commuters who can least afford it," it stated.

Mayor Lydia Kou, who is running for the state Assembly, launched a petition drive opposing the bill.

"I don't believe that nickel and diming people who are just trying to travel or get to work is the right way to ‘bail out' public transportation agencies," Kou's petition stated.

The full City Council opted not to take a stance on the bill, voting unanimously to simply "monitor" the bill.

Wiener and Wilson said that, in response to the opposition, they will collaborate with Bay Area legislators in a working group to determine which transit funding proposals to pursue in the next legislative session. Potential proposals include state budget allocations, temporary toll increases and the regional transit funding measure, among other ideas.

"Increasing tolls can be a significant burden to Bay Area commuters who are already dealing with high cost of living, inflation and other expenses. From an equity perspective, tolls can have substantial repercussions especially for those where public transit is not a viable option." Wilson said.

"We need to ensure there is accountability and verifiable data collection so that our proposed solutions are evidence-based and defensible to those being asked to bear the burden of this investment. I look forward to facilitating these discussions along with Senator Wiener in the Fall with interested members of the Bay Area Caucus," she added.

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency said in a statement on social media that it found the pause "very disappointing" and a "blow" to their efforts to preserve Muni service.

"But we're going to keep fighting for the hundreds of thousands of people who rely on Muni every single day," agency officials stated. "We can't afford to lose transit."

Palo Alto Online Staff Writer Gennady Sheyner contributed to this report.

Comments

Andy
Registered user
Stanford
on Aug 23, 2023 at 5:50 pm
Andy, Stanford
Registered user
on Aug 23, 2023 at 5:50 pm

Bridge tolls have already increased by skyrocketing levels (16% each time) and funds diverted (stolen) to fund chronically dysfunctional public transit and endless fiscal black holes with ZERO accountability or fixing the underlying model.

Scott Wiener is wrong to punish hard working commuters, including trucks, plumbers, electricians and anyone who cannot take public transit (which doesn't cross most of the bay).

ALL bridge tolls already diverted should be REFUNDED back to commuters.

There should be a class action lawsuit against those who used bridge tolls for anything other than the bridges.


Native to the BAY
Registered user
Old Palo Alto
on Aug 23, 2023 at 6:41 pm
Native to the BAY, Old Palo Alto
Registered user
on Aug 23, 2023 at 6:41 pm

The GGB was supposed to be free, forever — that was its big sell to spanning the Golden Gate. Ha. The only thing that I guess is free is walking across it. Now its a private authority which costs a museum like fee to cross in a vehicle.


Anonymous
Registered user
Duveneck/St. Francis
on Aug 23, 2023 at 7:40 pm
Anonymous, Duveneck/St. Francis
Registered user
on Aug 23, 2023 at 7:40 pm

Wow, I agree with Andy 100%!
Transit here is very poor - look at VTA.
If anything, budgets should be reduced.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.