News

Policymakers: Public transit will go over 'fiscal cliff' without more state dollars

Coalition urges Gov. Gavin Newsom to allot greater public transit funding in upcoming state budget

A BART train arrives at the Pleasant Hill BART station in Walnut Creek, Calif. on Feb. 1, 2021. Courtesy Ray Saint Germain/Bay City News Foundation.

As the upcoming state budget deadline looms over California, state policymakers warned Gov. Gavin Newsom that his ambitious climate targets will crumble without adequate funding for public transportation.

On Tuesday, a coalition of state lawmakers, labor leaders, environmental activists and transit officials stressed that public transportation will go over a "fiscal cliff" if it does not receive more state dollars. And if public transportation is not saved, it can cause lasting harm to the state's economy and people's quality of life.

Last week the California Transit Association (CTA), a group of transit agencies and public transit proponents, issued a $5.15 billion budget proposal over the next five years for transit agencies to stay afloat. For the upcoming fiscal year, the budget calls for another $213 million from the General Fund and to utilize excess federal highway funds and cap-and-trade profits.

The numbers come in response to many agencies' dwindling ridership numbers post COVID-19, federal pandemic relief funds drying up, and public outcry for safer rides on buses and rail systems.

Though numerous proposals are in the works throughout the state legislature that could provide more funding for public transit operations, the coalition says it's nowhere near enough to make up for the proposed $2 billion cut in transit infrastructure that Newsom is considering, and would only use transit capital funds for non-capital purposes.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

Michael Pimentel, executive director of the CTA, stressed that these funds are a "hand-up and a bridge forward," not a handout. He said challenges in recent years pushed agencies to reinvent their services and find funding elsewhere.

Now the CTA is asking for additional support from largely, non-general fund sources, recognizing the situation in which the state has found itself, Pimentel said.

State Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), a key player in the call for more transit funds, said that as public transportation adjusts to changes in ridership patterns, the state must ensure that the systems can survive.

"You cannot reform a system that has fallen apart. Left unchecked, these budget shortfalls will cause devastating and possibly permanent damage to our public transportation systems," Wiener said.

Wiener said he's already heard of potential major service cuts in the Bay Area, like MUNI eliminating 20 bus lines, or BART ending weekend rides entirely.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

And with those service cuts comes a "transit death spiral," he said -- with less frequent service, transit becomes less accessible, so people choose not to take public transit at all. Which only leads to more budget cuts that come at a cost for the disproportionate levels of seniors, low-income people and students who depend on transit systems to get around.

"This is a do or die moment for public transportation in California," he said.

East Bay Assembly member Buffy Wicks said a lack of transit funding would not only affect the commuters and schoolkids who depend on public transportation to get around, but could also affect the state's climate and housing goals.

"Our housing policy is predicated on the idea of our transit and our housing working together, so that could be undermined," Wicks said.

"Yes, we need accountability and reforms, but funding must come first," she said.

BART Director Rebecca Saltzman said new funding is needed to keep BART's operating budget stable, or else severe cuts in service and staff could take place as early as this year, which also affects its relationships with its labor partners. Trains may run only once an hour, or entire lines could be shuttered, she said.

"These devastating service cuts would turn away riders and send transit into a death spiral that would dramatically impact the quality of life in the Bay Area for everyone, not just transit riders," Saltzman said. "Traffic would worsen across our already congested roadways and bridges, and greenhouse gas emissions would increase further fueling climate change."

Melissa Romero of California Environmental Voters said that public transit investments are not just a matter of finances or climate metrics, it's also a matter of social justice.

"It's a matter of justice and fairness," she said. "We cannot afford to overlook the transformative power that public transit holds in promoting social and economic equality.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now

Follow Palo Alto Online and the Palo Alto Weekly on Twitter @paloaltoweekly, Facebook and on Instagram @paloaltoonline for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Policymakers: Public transit will go over 'fiscal cliff' without more state dollars

Coalition urges Gov. Gavin Newsom to allot greater public transit funding in upcoming state budget

by Olivia Wynkoop/Bay City News /

Uploaded: Wed, May 31, 2023, 6:22 pm

As the upcoming state budget deadline looms over California, state policymakers warned Gov. Gavin Newsom that his ambitious climate targets will crumble without adequate funding for public transportation.

On Tuesday, a coalition of state lawmakers, labor leaders, environmental activists and transit officials stressed that public transportation will go over a "fiscal cliff" if it does not receive more state dollars. And if public transportation is not saved, it can cause lasting harm to the state's economy and people's quality of life.

Last week the California Transit Association (CTA), a group of transit agencies and public transit proponents, issued a $5.15 billion budget proposal over the next five years for transit agencies to stay afloat. For the upcoming fiscal year, the budget calls for another $213 million from the General Fund and to utilize excess federal highway funds and cap-and-trade profits.

The numbers come in response to many agencies' dwindling ridership numbers post COVID-19, federal pandemic relief funds drying up, and public outcry for safer rides on buses and rail systems.

Though numerous proposals are in the works throughout the state legislature that could provide more funding for public transit operations, the coalition says it's nowhere near enough to make up for the proposed $2 billion cut in transit infrastructure that Newsom is considering, and would only use transit capital funds for non-capital purposes.

Michael Pimentel, executive director of the CTA, stressed that these funds are a "hand-up and a bridge forward," not a handout. He said challenges in recent years pushed agencies to reinvent their services and find funding elsewhere.

Now the CTA is asking for additional support from largely, non-general fund sources, recognizing the situation in which the state has found itself, Pimentel said.

State Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), a key player in the call for more transit funds, said that as public transportation adjusts to changes in ridership patterns, the state must ensure that the systems can survive.

"You cannot reform a system that has fallen apart. Left unchecked, these budget shortfalls will cause devastating and possibly permanent damage to our public transportation systems," Wiener said.

Wiener said he's already heard of potential major service cuts in the Bay Area, like MUNI eliminating 20 bus lines, or BART ending weekend rides entirely.

And with those service cuts comes a "transit death spiral," he said -- with less frequent service, transit becomes less accessible, so people choose not to take public transit at all. Which only leads to more budget cuts that come at a cost for the disproportionate levels of seniors, low-income people and students who depend on transit systems to get around.

"This is a do or die moment for public transportation in California," he said.

East Bay Assembly member Buffy Wicks said a lack of transit funding would not only affect the commuters and schoolkids who depend on public transportation to get around, but could also affect the state's climate and housing goals.

"Our housing policy is predicated on the idea of our transit and our housing working together, so that could be undermined," Wicks said.

"Yes, we need accountability and reforms, but funding must come first," she said.

BART Director Rebecca Saltzman said new funding is needed to keep BART's operating budget stable, or else severe cuts in service and staff could take place as early as this year, which also affects its relationships with its labor partners. Trains may run only once an hour, or entire lines could be shuttered, she said.

"These devastating service cuts would turn away riders and send transit into a death spiral that would dramatically impact the quality of life in the Bay Area for everyone, not just transit riders," Saltzman said. "Traffic would worsen across our already congested roadways and bridges, and greenhouse gas emissions would increase further fueling climate change."

Melissa Romero of California Environmental Voters said that public transit investments are not just a matter of finances or climate metrics, it's also a matter of social justice.

"It's a matter of justice and fairness," she said. "We cannot afford to overlook the transformative power that public transit holds in promoting social and economic equality.

Comments

Online Name
Registered user
Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
on May 31, 2023 at 9:24 pm
Online Name, Embarcadero Oaks/Leland
Registered user
on May 31, 2023 at 9:24 pm

"Last week the California Transit Association (CTA), a group of transit agencies and public transit proponents, issued a $5.15 billion budget proposal over the next five years for transit agencies to stay afloat. For the upcoming fiscal year, the budget calls for another $213 million from the General Fund and to utilize excess federal highway funds and cap-and-trade profits."

The numbers come in response to many agencies' dwindling ridership numbers post COVID-19, federal pandemic relief funds drying up, and public outcry for safer rides on buses and rail systems."


Remind me again why Palo Alto is paying someone $175,000 a year to give out $100,000 in public transit passes at a time when public transit -- which recognizes it has a funding problem -- is cutting service because ridership is low and falling due to remote work, layoffs etc. AND when the state isn't funding it as the state goes from a $28B surplus to a state deficit that grows by billions each month.

Perhaps Palo Alto could comment?


Mondoman
Registered user
Green Acres
on May 31, 2023 at 10:16 pm
Mondoman, Green Acres
Registered user
on May 31, 2023 at 10:16 pm

Aren't MUNI and BART pretty much dependent on the situation in SF? Also, cracking down on crime and druggies in the cars and stations would likely help attract discretionary riders.


Bystander
Registered user
Another Palo Alto neighborhood
on Jun 1, 2023 at 7:28 am
Bystander, Another Palo Alto neighborhood
Registered user
on Jun 1, 2023 at 7:28 am

Until or unless government funding allows for improvements to public transport it will not survive. Other major cities within a region (think London) manage to do well, but our transportation is too cluttered to be user friendly.

London transport is all one agency, Transport for London. Trains and buses make the airports easily accessible and there are now charges to drive a car into the airports. Trains and buses are frequent and an app will show where the next train/bus is and how long it will take to arrive. The gates into train stations can be opened with a credit card swipe and when exiting another swipe will take the right money - no ticket required which is ideal for single trip. In fact, you don't need a ticket, as a regular rider you have your ticket on your phone and regulars just hold their phone over the gate.

Investment in public transport works for regular commuters and for tourists. Here we think of public transport for poor people or those without cars, but don't provide efficient alternatives to driving. We don't even have public buses along our highways, it is only Google and other tech firms who innovatively do that!

Public transport will work when it becomes an efficient alternative to driving. It is far from that in the Bay Area.

Oh, and cleanliness and crime are a big factor too.


Resident 1-Adobe Meadows
Registered user
Adobe-Meadow
on Jun 1, 2023 at 10:37 am
Resident 1-Adobe Meadows, Adobe-Meadow
Registered user
on Jun 1, 2023 at 10:37 am

This is so sad. I have been on Caltrain to go up to the ball park on game days - filled with people in their team shirts - all looking forward to a great day. Used to go up to the Bart station for a ride up to the CITY - visit the big Macy's and Union Square, the Embarcadero and port. All of those great days with the convenience of not driving up and parking are diminished. Friend sent a FB picture of someone injecting himself on Bart in front of everyone. No police on trains to control riders. UGH.

What is worse is that "Transportation" is the rationale/excuse for density in housing - the CA legislators are not connecting the legal long term game plans here. Single topic, single focus not working - it is all connected.


Anonymous
Registered user
Duveneck/St. Francis
on Jun 1, 2023 at 12:22 pm
Anonymous, Duveneck/St. Francis
Registered user
on Jun 1, 2023 at 12:22 pm

NBC Bay Area on new study on fare evasion on BART:
Web Link

In other words, instead of hardening entry gates to stop fare evaders (huge revenue loss!), taxpayers fund a drawn out unnecessary “study” of an obvious, known criminal problem.

I have little confidence our government bureaucrats will ever take action to make BART clean, safe, timely and fiscally responsible.


Resident 1-Adobe Meadows
Registered user
Adobe-Meadow
on Jun 1, 2023 at 7:11 pm
Resident 1-Adobe Meadows, Adobe-Meadow
Registered user
on Jun 1, 2023 at 7:11 pm

I was watching a movie of a group in Italy. Sleek mew train to go from point a to point b. Sleek trains in Europe. Why sleek trains in Europe? Why not here? What is wrong with us that we cannot conduct transit business is a consistent manner same as the rest of the world?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.